• The facepunch custom emoticon project - you want better emoticons?? Then make them yourself you litt
    2,285 replies, posted
You should change the eyes to make him look uneasy, as well as add some frames before he has the sick in his mouth.
If it looped better it'd be almost perfect
How's this? [img]http://i.imgur.com/3gKYTTr.gif[/img] [QUOTE=wauterboi;48329703]Better, but you need some frames before hand so he [I]gets [/I]sick and isn't this weirdly permanently sick emoticon.[/QUOTE] [img]http://i.imgur.com/aCivn2x.gif[/img] [img]http://i.imgur.com/szNIJmi.gif[/img] also this [img]http://i.imgur.com/HNoa5KH.png[/img]
[QUOTE=wauterboi;48326333]You should change the eyes to make him look uneasy, as well as add some frames before he has the sick in his mouth.[/QUOTE] Better, but you need some frames before hand so he [I]gets [/I]sick and isn't this weirdly permanently sick emoticon.
[QUOTE=magravn;48329520][img]http://i.imgur.com/HNoa5KH.png[/img][/QUOTE] This one's adorable and I really hope it gets in
I kind of liked the old :vomit: better where he was just a busted fire hydrant of bile.
[IMG]http://piskel-imgstore-b.appspot.com/img/824c7061-36bb-11e5-9bc4-ed34bf88cfb6.gif[/IMG] :heisenberg: Maybe it will inspire someone whos actually good at this ):
Is it over?
:zing: should be removed because it's only used for shitposting in SH [editline]4th August 2015[/editline] also :joy: has a shadow on like 2 frames and it's bugging me
[QUOTE=Tobin;48368960]also :joy: has a shadow on like 2 frames and it's bugging me[/QUOTE] its not a shadow, its the face deforming as it bounces
[img]http://i.imgur.com/sKGsKMr.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=Winstonn;48371679][img]http://i.imgur.com/sKGsKMr.gif[/img][/QUOTE] The closeup shaking isn't aggressive enough.
[QUOTE=Winstonn;48371679][img]http://i.imgur.com/sKGsKMr.gif[/img][/QUOTE] I look forward to the future when html5 and css3 animations are so commonplace that we can make animated emotes like these. Allowing them not to fuck with the formatting of the post and just be placed like any regular emote.
[QUOTE=dgg;48372498]I look forward to the future when html5 and css3 animations are so commonplace that we can make animated emotes like these. Allowing them not to fuck with the formatting of the post and just be placed like any regular emote.[/QUOTE] You could probably do it (in most browsers) but re-styling a checkbox as the emoticon (with a little standardised notice that it's clickable). Then it would be possible to subsequently animate the thing without interfering with readability.
[QUOTE=Tamschi;48374238]You could probably do it (in most browsers) but re-styling a checkbox as the emoticon (with a little standardised notice that it's clickable). Then it would be possible to subsequently animate the thing without interfering with readability.[/QUOTE] You can do it already, but I'm thinking about it being so commonplace that we just ship it right into the :emote: code. No clicking, just like a regular animated emote but animated by the browser. Emotes that ruined readability would obviously not be included unless they only ruined the readability of ones own post purposefully.
[QUOTE=dgg;48375408]You can do it already, but I'm thinking about it being so commonplace that we just ship it right into the :emote: code. No clicking, just like a regular animated emote but animated by the browser. Emotes that ruined readability would obviously not be included unless they only ruined the readability of ones own post purposefully.[/QUOTE] It depends on the kind of emote. With pixel graphics plain animated images are far more efficient and small.
[QUOTE=Tamschi;48376005]It depends on the kind of emote. With pixel graphics plain animated images are far more efficient and small.[/QUOTE] Sounds like we're derailing from the original point here. To animate emotes that take a lot of vertical or horizontal space without breaking formatting. If it doesn't break formatting to begin with, by being too tall or super wide then there would be no reason to animate it with the browser.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/rdBMghn.png[/IMG] :dog:
I was looking away for a second and I got fuckin' spooked [editline]5th August 2015[/editline] by the enormous smiley that is.
Does somebody still have the one someone made that looked like a period for a few seconds only to transform into a :downs:? That was the best one imo.
[QUOTE=jetboy;48380859]Does somebody still have the one someone made that looked like a period for a few seconds only to transform into a :downs:? That was the best one imo.[/QUOTE] I could probably find it But is this V1 of the thread?
yep
Went though every image page It's not there, like There's quite a lot of images that have been removed from their sites And a number of broken images Unfortunate
Found it[img]http://i.imgur.com/ZxXjJGI.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=jetboy;48382305]Found it[img]http://i.imgur.com/ZxXjJGI.gif[/img][/QUOTE] :wideeye:
[QUOTE=jetboy;48382305]Found it[img]http://i.imgur.com/ZxXjJGI.gif[/img][/QUOTE] When you said period, I thought... I don't know why I would think that.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/0WsNb0n.png[/IMG] :fuckface: First attempt
As funny as that is, do you really want to see that all the time? And how would it be used if not for flaming?
[img]https://i.imgur.com/60cpoWZ.png[/img] I don't know what I was thinking
[QUOTE=Scratch.;48382205]Went though every image page It's not there, like There's quite a lot of images that have been removed from their sites And a number of broken images Unfortunate[/QUOTE] Knowing FP plenty of those were probably hosted on Dropbox. People have a bad habit of putting things on there, linking them on FP, then removing them maybe a day later instead of using an actual image host.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.