Well gosh guys now I need a new conspiracy to research
way to just blow all the fun
[editline]10th September 2012[/editline]
onto the titanic
I still haven't heard an explanation for the squibs though.
[QUOTE=MadPro119;37622415]Well gosh guys now I need a new conspiracy to research
way to just blow all the fun
[editline]10th September 2012[/editline]
onto the titanic[/QUOTE]
the iceberg was actually made of steel placed by the government!!!
[QUOTE=GameDev;37622618]the iceberg was actually made of steel placed by the government!!![/QUOTE]
well it is the only ship to ever sink due to icebergs.
[QUOTE=Techno-Man;37622570]I still haven't heard an explanation for the squibs though.[/QUOTE]
you mean other than the one that was fucking posted in this thread?
or how about the obvious, that the floors inside the building were collapsing faster than the outside structure, so of course some material was pushed out of the building at a lower point than what appeared to be the "top" of the collapsing building
[QUOTE=Techno-Man;37622570]I still haven't heard an explanation for the squibs though.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.debunking911.com/overp.htm[/url]
Thar ya go
[QUOTE=GameDev;37622618]the iceberg was actually made of steel placed by the government!!![/QUOTE]
Don't forget that the hull of the ship was made of ice.
[QUOTE=MadPro119;37622642]well it is the only ship to ever sink due to icebergs.[/QUOTE]
[URL="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/gallery/2007/nov/23/antarctica"]http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/gallery/2007/nov/23/antarctica[/URL]
cool claim
if it was bush's fault, well now its a few years too late,
NEXT CONSPIRACY
i vote the U.S.S. Macon was sabotaged to derail U.S. airship development prior to WW2 because the germans didnt want our nonflammable helium ships to graft their zepplins
what proof do i have, absolutely no documentation whatsoever, and it went down in a storm so theres no film of it either
[QUOTE=oh ok;37622685][URL="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/gallery/2007/nov/23/antarctica"]http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/gallery/2007/nov/23/antarctica[/URL]
cool claim[/QUOTE]
the part where I quoted someone saying the iceberg was made of steel was evidence of my sarcasm.
What kind of shit is this? OP you are suppose to defend the conspiracy using every little abnormality you can.
If your gonna make a 9/11 conspiracy thread do it right. Shit
[QUOTE=BusterBluth;37622730]What kind of shit is this? OP you are suppose to defend the conspiracy using every little abnormality you can.
If your gonna make a 9/11 conspiracy thread do it right. Shit[/QUOTE]
Sorry I can start again if ya want...
why no one talking about pentagon incident? simple where the plane and how it fits to the window
[QUOTE=MadPro119;37622737]Sorry I can start again if ya want...[/QUOTE]
No, it wouldn't be the same now. Just next time try harder.
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;37621899]
[url]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/4559804/Terror-suspects-linked-to-al-Qaeda-on-the-run-in-Midlands.html[/url] Oh what do you know they actually found them
And for the record it does matter. If you can't find the person who DID it, what's the use finding the people who funded it. This is an investigation, not an intelligence operation, if you want to get to them, you look through the ones who funded it. You want to investigate, you determine your assets.
Oh and here's the above quote from the commission: "Al Qaeda and Usama Bin Ladin obtained money from a variety of sources-"
[/QUOTE]
Page 172 of the 911 commission report states
To date, the U.S. government has not been able to determine the origin of the money used for the 9/11 attacks. Ultimately the question is of little practical significance.
Those are the words of the Commission report, not Corbett's and not mine.
[editline]10th September 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=BusterBluth;37622763]No, it wouldn't be the same now. Just next time try harder.[/QUOTE]
too late
[QUOTE=FluD;37622747]why no one talking about pentagon incident? simple where the plane and how it fits to the window[/QUOTE]
See, this is how you do it. A barley understandable sentence referring to some tiny abnormality.
OP you forgot the part where Bush wore a turban, and Howard Stern hijacked the fifth plane.
also forgot to take your meds.....
Also the way they were able to determine who is at fault for 9/11 was because they found Atta's bags after they were not put on the plane. He had his will in his bag. Why would you take a will onto a plane you plan on crashing into a building that will result in a fiery explosion of death?
[QUOTE=MadPro119;37622775]Page 172 of the 911 commission report states
To date, the U.S. government has not been able to determine the origin of the money used for the 9/11 attacks. Ultimately the question is of little practical significance.
Those are the words of the Commission report, not Corbett's and not mine.
[/QUOTE]
Hi.
I actually happen to own a copy of the 9/11 Commission report. On page 172,
right after the line that you [B]quoted out of context[/B], the book states:
[QUOTE]A-Qaeda had many avenues of funding. If a particular funding source dried up, al Qaeda could have easily tapped a different source or diverted funds from another project to fund an operation that cost $400,000-$500,000 over nearly two years
THE FUNDING OF THE 9/11 PLOT
As noted above, the 9/11 plotters spent somewhere between $400,000 and $500,000 to plan and conduct their attack. The available evidence indicates that the 19 operatives were funded by Al-Qaeda, either through wire transfers, or cash provided by KSM, which they carried into the United States or deposited in foreign accounts and accessed from this country.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Disotrtion;37622970]Hi.
I actually happen to own a copy of the 9/11 Commission report. On page 172,
right after the line that you [B]quoted out of context[/B], the book states:[/QUOTE]
pfffft context
Get out your tinfoil hats, everyone!
[QUOTE=MadPro119;37622235]What people suggest is that 9/11 may have been the day after as so people would forget about the large sum of missing money. Cover up one screw up with another.
That isn't a very good excuse either but it is better than how you phrased it.[/quote]
You are really not helping yourself out at all.
[quote]""I don't know what other training they went through after me, but they didn't even have even the basic navigation skills," Garza said."[/QUOTE]
Perhaps it's a front? They're training to, you know, do something pretty fucking serious, appearing as inept pilots will maintain their confidentiality. I dunno, does it matter?
[editline]10th September 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=MadPro119;37622285]And to be honest I do not know why you keep claiming the maneuver he did was easy.
The pentagon is only 23m tall, the plane is roughly half that tall. That is not an easy hit to make.
I'm not saying he didn't, just stating that would be hard.[/quote]
Yeah it's hard
what's your point?
[quote]Thats what I am talking about being silly.
The idea is that they knew they were going to have to announce the missing money so they orchestrated this plot long before.[/QUOTE]
Nice idea, but it's filled with a lot of holes.
What incentives would the US government have for killing thousands of its own civilians then spending trillions of dollars on a decade long war?
Money? Who made money and how much? Prove it to me.
Oil? We're spending billions of dollars on biofuels and electric cars, why would we spend trillions of dollars to procure a couple millions of dollars worth of oil?
The only option you have left is genocide and I'm just going to dismiss anything you say from here on out if you so much as hint at this.
I gave up trying to convince people 9/11 was a false flag a long time ago. Just wait a few decades (if we all live that long) and anti truthers will all be proven wrong. It's now come out that the gulf of Tonkin was a false flag hoax to ignite the Vietnam war so why is it so hard to understand that this too could easily be a well planned cover up designed to incite enough public anger that the US is justified in doing absolutely anything it wants?
Don't just rate me dumb for having a different opinion than you. Actually sit back and take off your patriot goggles to try and see the world and how it works from a different perspective.
I also dismiss claims that further investigation into 9/11 is hurtful to the memories of the dead and their loved ones. If I had been killed in such an attack I would welcome any attempt at studying how and why I died. I think it's just another way of acknowledging that they had value as human beings, not just a death toll in the papers :(
Just my two cents
(you can rate me boxes now, all you sheep out there)
[editline]11th September 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=cccritical;37629068]What incentives would the US government have for killing thousands of its own civilians then spending trillions of dollars on a decade long war?
Money? Who made money and how much? Prove it to me.
Oil? We're spending billions of dollars on biofuels and electric cars, why would we spend trillions of dollars to procure a couple millions of dollars worth of oil?
The only option you have left is genocide and I'm just going to dismiss anything you say from here on out if you so much as hint at this.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.businesspundit.com/the-25-most-vicious-iraq-war-profiteers/[/url]
oh my just look at this list :)
[QUOTE=entertainer89;37630354]. It's now come out that the gulf of Tonkin was a false flag hoax to ignite the Vietnam war[/QUOTE]
[citation needed]
[QUOTE=GameDev;37622618]the iceberg was actually made of steel placed by the government!!![/QUOTE]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saHs6J0OXVI[/media]
[QUOTE=entertainer89;37630354]I gave up trying to convince people 9/11 was a false flag a long time ago. Just wait a few decades (if we all live that long) and anti truthers will all be proven wrong. It's now come out that the gulf of Tonkin was a false flag hoax to ignite the Vietnam war so why is it so hard to understand that this too could easily be a well planned cover up designed to incite enough public anger that the US is justified in doing absolutely anything it wants?
Don't just rate me dumb for having a different opinion than you. Actually sit back and take off your patriot goggles to try and see the world and how it works from a different perspective.
I also dismiss claims that further investigation into 9/11 is hurtful to the memories of the dead and their loved ones. If I had been killed in such an attack I would welcome any attempt at studying how and why I died. I think it's just another way of acknowledging that they had value as human beings, not just a death toll in the papers :(
Just my two cents
(you can rate me boxes now, all you sheep out there)[/QUOTE]
I'm sorry, I can see how at a glance it could be a false flag, but it's not not feasible, economically and morally, for this to be a false flag.
Planes don't just fly into buildings because the government wants to start a war. It's as simple as that. The government starts a war when planes fly into buildings. What you're saying is essentially that the government shot themselves in the foot, with a shotgun, in order to get a paper cut on their foot looked at. The damage does not outweigh the result.
And I'm not sure throwing around ad hominems like "sheep" is going to get you anywhere.
[editline]11th September 2012[/editline]
And more importantly why are people so dead set on proving that the government is acting against their own self interest for whatever stupid fucking goal?
How did the hijackers know how to fly 767s?
[QUOTE=Coffee;37630642]How did the hijackers know how to fly 767s?[/QUOTE]
Who says they had to? They can just hold the pilot at gunpoint.
[QUOTE=Coffee;37630642]How did the hijackers know how to fly 767s?[/QUOTE]
They had previous training in the US in both light Cessna aircraft and commercial aircraft simulators.
[editline]11th September 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Protocol7;37630648]Who says they had to? They can just hold the pilot at gunpoint.[/QUOTE]
No, the recording clearly showed that they were the ones who flew the planes.
Plus, what pilot would agree to fly his plane into a building? Might as well fly it at the ground if you're gonna die anyway.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
