Half in the Bag: Jack and Jill [OR How Adam Sandler scams the system]
44 replies, posted
I'm fairly certain that they probably just get in for free. A lot of critiques and reviewers get free stuff all the time.
[QUOTE=monkey11;33521815]I'm fairly certain that they probably just get in for free. A lot of critiques and reviewers get free stuff all the time.[/QUOTE]
They said in previous reviews that they don't pay to watch the movies they go to.
This was great, but I still can't wait for their Indiana Jones 4 review.
Rusty and cheese go learn the difference between fact and opinion.
My reasons for not watching all of it are perfectly valid because oh hey it's my opinion. The first 20 minutes goes over how they predicted it would be another Adam Sandler movie (did not see that one coming) while trying to describe the film to the audience but not doing a very good job since they couldn't use clips from the entire movie.
Maybe it picked up after the first 20 minutes but again it couldn't keep me there. And cheeseman did you watch twilight yet
[QUOTE=thrawn2787;33525430]Rusty and cheese go learn the difference between fact and opinion.
My reasons for not watching all of it are perfectly valid because oh hey it's my opinion. The first 20 minutes goes over how they predicted it would be another Adam Sandler movie (did not see that one coming) while trying to describe the film to the audience but not doing a very good job since they couldn't use clips from the entire movie.[/QUOTE]
Uh, yeah, so? Where's the bad in that?
[QUOTE=MasterG;33527946]5 or 10 minutes of [b]awkward[/b] jokes.[/QUOTE]
thats some subjective shit there hoss
[QUOTE=simkas;33521007]Pirate what? It's not out on DVD so there's no way for them to get any footage.[/QUOTE]
Telesync? Cam versions? I know there's some of that out
This is wonderful
and yeah this movie costing $79 million is insane and totally ridiculous. District 9 only cost $30 million for fuck's sake.
[QUOTE=postal;33533786]This is wonderful
and yeah this movie costing $79 million is insane and totally ridiculous. District 9 only cost $30 million for fuck's sake.[/QUOTE]
Holy shit, seriously? Wow thats completely fucked.
[QUOTE=Mooe94;33533367]Telesync? Cam versions? I know there's some of that out[/QUOTE]
Neither of those would be even remotely good enough quality to show.
[editline]2nd December 2011[/editline]
And not to mention both are illegal.
[QUOTE=Demolitions2;33533823]Holy shit, seriously? Wow thats completely fucked.[/QUOTE]
Get this: Fucking 'Independence Day', with all its scenes of entire cities being blown up, cost $72 million to make. That's $7 million less than it cost to make a movie where Adam Sandler wears a wig and dress.
[QUOTE=thrawn2787;33525430]Rusty and cheese go learn the difference between fact and opinion.
My reasons for not watching all of it are perfectly valid because oh hey it's my opinion. The first 20 minutes goes over how they predicted it would be another Adam Sandler movie (did not see that one coming) while trying to describe the film to the audience but not doing a very good job since they couldn't use clips from the entire movie.
Maybe it picked up after the first 20 minutes but again it couldn't keep me there. And cheeseman did you watch twilight yet[/QUOTE]
ur opinion is wrong and terrible
[QUOTE=postal;33534147]Get this: Fucking 'Independence Day', with all its scenes of entire cities being blown up, cost $72 million to make. That's $7 million less than it cost to make a movie where Adam Sandler wears a wig and dress.[/QUOTE]
It all went to the Pony leg breaking scene.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.