[video]https://youtu.be/uDJOY_-iDJ0[/video]
Edit: PMing it to Craptasket now :v:
finally, a true female game character
Does the model have faceposing and fingerposing ability? If not, would it be possible to add it?
[QUOTE=Banhfunbags;48621279]Don't make a nude version.[/QUOTE]
i think OP is secretly doing this, i can sense it
[QUOTE=SFC003;48622408]i think OP is secretly doing this, i can sense it[/QUOTE]
If not I'm sure deviant art will have a run with this.
[QUOTE=SFC003;48622408]i think OP is secretly doing this, i can sense it[/QUOTE]
I'm most certainly not.
[QUOTE=Zyler;48622358]Does the model have faceposing and fingerposing ability? If not, would it be possible to add it?[/QUOTE]
It has both.
[t]https://d.maxfile.ro/wpjfmfqnfx.png[/t]
[QUOTE=kila58;48622470]If not I'm sure deviant art will have a run with this.[/QUOTE]
Someone will make it, someone is actually attracted to her or has some sick fetish for Neanderthal feminists. If people are attracted to eating vomit, someone is fucking attracted to her, and soon we will see a horrifying model with unclipped torso parts that are going through eachother, just like those horrible nude models from like 2008.
[QUOTE=Blue Meanie;48622599]Someone will make it, someone is actually attracted to her or has some sick fetish for Neanderthal feminists. If people are attracted to eating vomit, someone is fucking attracted to her, and soon we will see a horrifying model with unclipped torso parts that are going through eachother, just like those horrible nude models from like 2008.[/QUOTE]
Honestly I think a bad nude model would make an even better response.
[QUOTE=Blue Meanie;48622599]Someone will make it, someone is actually attracted to her or has some sick fetish for Neanderthal feminists. If people are attracted to eating vomit, someone is fucking attracted to her, and soon we will see a horrifying model with unclipped torso parts that are going through eachother, just like those horrible nude models from like 2008.[/QUOTE]
A perfect description, now if only I could model.
[QUOTE=TFA;48622553]I'm most certainly not.[/QUOTE]
you know denial is the first stage of acceptance
[t]https://d.maxfile.ro/eyqzfykufi.png[/t]
[url]http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=513138738[/url]
Final version is out for SFM. I'll upload something for GMod later today.
That screenshot doesn't do justice.
Looks more accurate from a small distance:
[QUOTE=TFA;48620346][t]https://d.maxfile.ro/oonikkhrwr.gif[/t][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Talvy;48622870]That screenshot doesn't do justice.[/QUOTE]
It's released, so feel free to make one.
Her head should be a little more vertical, IMO, but the flannel is on point
Off topic, but I'm honestly surprised that people think she's super ugly. Does she overdo her makeup and basically everything? Abso-fucking-loutly. but I like big noses, they have alot of character.
[QUOTE=Lord of Boxes;48623697]Off topic, but I'm honestly surprised that people think she's super ugly. Does she overdo her makeup and basically everything? Abso-fucking-loutly. but I like big noses, they have alot of character.[/QUOTE]
You are gonna be the guy to make the nude model, huh?
[QUOTE=TFA;48622854][t]https://d.maxfile.ro/eyqzfykufi.png[/t]
[url]http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=513138738[/url]
Final version is out for SFM. I'll upload something for GMod later today.[/QUOTE]
All I can think of is le happy merchant.
I see Scout who underwent gender reassignment.
[QUOTE=jonu67;48619447]So it's "creepy" when people make a model of this particular woman.
But when people make crap tons of models of other figures, like Gabe Newell, vin diesel, etc, it's perfectly fine?[/QUOTE]
Because the intent is explicitly different. We do shit for Gabe Newell because we praise him and go "Yeah, awesome, I have him in the game!" and stuff like that. Doing it for people like Anita is just "lmfao, look how ridiculous I am, right guys?" It's just poking fun, senselessly. I'll call her a moron for her Feminist Frequency "project" but this is immature tbh.
I mean, come on, look at this shit:
[QUOTE=Craptasket;48619042]Would you like to see anita being drilldo'd and fly off?[/QUOTE]
I know Craptasket is notorious for this shit but still.
[QUOTE=LegndNikko;48624950]
I know Craptasket is notorious for this shit but still.[/QUOTE]
I was pretty sure he said that as a joke but now that you've taken him seriously I don't know what the future holds.
[QUOTE=BANNED USER;48624880]I see Scout who underwent gender reassignment.[/QUOTE]
So when do we get a Brianna Wu playermodel?
Brilliant.
[QUOTE=Tetsmega;48624974]I was pretty sure he said that as a joke but now that you've taken him seriously I don't know what the future holds.[/QUOTE]
He's done worse, so I was a bit inclined to think he was serious, here.
[QUOTE=LegndNikko;48624950]Because the intent is explicitly different. We do shit for Gabe Newell because we praise him and go "Yeah, awesome, I have him in the game!" and stuff like that. Doing it for people like Anita is just "lmfao, look how ridiculous I am, right guys?" It's just poking fun, senselessly. I'll call her a moron for her Feminist Frequency "project" but this is immature tbh.
I mean, come on, look at this shit:
I know Craptasket is notorious for this shit but still.[/QUOTE]
Actually Gabe Newell is a person regardless of what you think of him and so is Anita and that's all that matters because it's just a 3D Model. It's not immature to make a 3D model of a person. He's not making it to represent her in silly ways, it's literally a representation of her in clothes she's even worn.
You sound like you really need to go outside and get some human interaction into your life experience because
ironically, your stance on it is what's really immature, and even more ironic is calling her feminist frequency project moronic when you're doing the same thing over a 3D model instead.
[QUOTE=Sweet Berries;48626729]Actually Gabe Newell is a person regardless of what you think of him and so is Anita and that's all that matters because it's just a 3D Model. It's not immature to make a 3D model of a person. He's not making it to represent her in silly ways, it's literally a representation of her in clothes she's even worn.
You sound like you really need to go outside and get some human interaction into your life experience because
ironically, your stance on it is what's really immature, and even more ironic is calling her feminist frequency project moronic when you're doing the same thing over a 3D model instead.[/QUOTE]
It's the intent behind it. If it wasn't for mockery, the OP wouldn't have all those funny ratings.
Please refrain from personal attacks.
And that's... Not what irony is. Also, you said little more than "nuh-uh, [I]you're[/I] immature."
Please, elaborate on how what I'm saying is immature, and how condemning her project is relatable to condemning the playermodel.
To be honest, I would laugh at any real person being recreated in Garry's Mod. Give me a Will Smith player model.
[QUOTE=LegndNikko;48626780]It's the intent behind it. If it wasn't for mockery, the OP wouldn't have all those funny ratings.
Please refrain from personal attacks.
And that's... Not what irony is. Also, you said little more than "nuh-uh, [I]you're[/I] immature."
Please, elaborate on how what I'm saying is immature, and how condemning her project is relatable to condemning the playermodel.[/QUOTE]
I don't see the OP showing any intent for it to be mocked. He made a model and he shows it shooting guns and using katanas in garry's mod. You'll have to explain to me further how people rating the post funny has any relation to the OP's intent when he made the model. It's ironic because it's like you're saying her very existence in any form is a representation of mocking her.
Disagreeing with your opinion is not a personal attack.
My above post does not say "Nuh-uh you're immature." Please read it as many times as it takes lol.
To elaborate for you, her argument is that it's wrong for video game developers to represent a female in certain ways in a video game unless it's in a non-sexualized way. Your argument is that it's wrong for 3D Modellers to create a model of a person unless the general feelings some people have of the person is "yeah I like this guy haha". Where does how some people feel about a person in real life come into whether or not it's OK to make a 3D model of them?
[QUOTE=Sweet Berries;48626838]I don't see the OP showing any intent for it to be mocked. He made a model and he shows it shooting guns and using katanas in garry's mod. You'll have to explain to me further how people rating the post funny has any relation to the OP's intent when he made the model. It's ironic because it's like you're saying her very existence in any form is a representation of mocking her.[/QUOTE]
Facepunch doesn't like Anita; it's foolish to try to dispute this. And it's also foolish to think that people aren't above mocking her, [URL="http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1484342&p=48618192&viewfull=1#post48618192"]like[/URL] [URL="http://[QUOTE=Intoxicated Spy;48618694]Tempting to tweet it at her, I want to see the shitstorm[/QUOTE]"]they've[/URL] [URL="http://[QUOTE=Ehmmett;48618696]can i make sex poses with this[/QUOTE]"]openly[/URL] done, [URL="http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1484342&p=48619748&viewfull=1#post48619748"]even explicitly saying that they're making fun of her.[/URL]
And don't try to dance around some of those linked posts saying "but they didn't say anything about mocking her at all, all they're saying is x and y" because it's pretty blantant what they're intent is.
[QUOTE=Sweet Berries;48626838]Disagreeing with your opinion is not a personal attack.[/quote]
[QUOTE=Sweet Berries;48626729]You sound like you really need to go outside and get some human interaction into your life experience because[/quote]
This is, though.
[QUOTE=Sweet Berries;48626838]My above post does not say "Nuh-uh you're immature." Please read it as many times as it takes lol.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Sweet Berries;48626729]ironically, your stance on it is what's really immature, and even more ironic is calling her feminist frequency project moronic when you're doing the same thing over a 3D model instead.[/QUOTE]
Yeah you pretty much said that
[QUOTE=Sweet Berries;48626838]To elaborate for you, her argument is that it's wrong for video game developers to represent a female in certain ways in a video game unless it's in a non-sexualized way.[/QUOTE]
I don't need a summary of what Sarkeesian's videos say. Her arguments were biased and flawed, and one of the final straws was condemning GTA V for being able to kill women in that game.
[QUOTE=Sweet Berries;48626838]Your argument is that it's wrong for 3D Modellers to create a model of a person unless the general feelings some people have of the person is "yeah I like this guy haha". Where does how some people feel about a person in real life come into whether or not it's OK to make a 3D model of them?[/QUOTE]
Yeah because it's made to mock her. It comes into play because when they made that model for Anita, it's used as a tool to make fun of her.
Oh god why am I going to far into this