• Modern Warfare 3 VS Battlefield 3
    50 replies, posted
Personally, I've really started to care less of what other people think of modern FPSs. The view they try to point you to is a "all games are shit; games use to be good" POV. I've played the BF3 beta and I had fun, I really don't believe a video can generalize opinions on a personal experience. If both games were really similar, then I could understand, but MW3 is an infantry based shooter, BF3 is more focused on vehicle combat [i]with[/i] infrantry tied in. Two different games.
[QUOTE=Hakita;32606704]I can't help but to notice how bad some of the people in the TF2 video were. Were you playing against new people?[/QUOTE] Probably, I just joined some random Australian servers.
They didn't come out yet.
[QUOTE=simkas;32605778]ARMA 3 is not a military FPS. It's a simulator. There's a big difference.[/QUOTE] It's both. You play as a military soldier in a first person view, so there, we have military FPS. Then you're also simulating a battle, that's a simulator.
Stating the obvious.
BF3 is fun. I was a CoD fan too, but I never thought Battlefield was a bad game, I prefer BF more now. :)
[QUOTE=LordApocca;32608153]BF3 vs MW3 is stupid, since Skyrim obviously wins.[/QUOTE] It shames me to say I've never played any other Elder scrolls
[QUOTE=Ermac20;32607259]there both gonna suck shitballs in my opinion after ea butchered the pc port so they dont have to care for it[/QUOTE] Battlefield 3 was developed for the PC platform.
at least its not as bad as people comparing saints row 3 to gta iv
I gotta admit, this big argument between two video games is pretty silly And they're not even released yet! Oh well, people have opinions...
[QUOTE=Atlascore;32618826]Pfft-HAHAHAHAHAhahahaha... hahahahaha..[/QUOTE] But it was?
Now make a video about people complaining so much about a BETA, complaining how its not the aspects of BF2 when the gamemode is Rush not Conquest. When Conquest is out that is when team work and slower pace comes out pushing enemies back and forth.
[QUOTE=Atlascore;32619510]Battlelog.[/QUOTE] That just proves that it's NOT a console port. Console versions don't have battlelog, so battlelog was mad specifically for the PC version. Which proves it's not a port.
He calls it a huge step backward. Too bad it actually works.
[QUOTE=Atlascore;32619733]But battlelog is horribly inefficient, [b]you're launching the game from a browser.[/b] The only other games that launch from your browser are those crappy F2P games and some MMOs. A main menu is one of the most basic game features, literally 99% of games ever made have them BF3 not having one for the PC is just plain idiotic.[/QUOTE] So far it works better than BC2's or BF2's server browsers did so I really don't mind it myself.
[QUOTE=Aznsniper911;32619376]Now make a video about people complaining so much about a BETA, complaining how its not the aspects of BF2 when the gamemode is Rush not Conquest. When Conquest is out that is when team work and slower pace comes out pushing enemies back and forth.[/QUOTE] I'll get right on that ;)
[img]http://i.imgur.com/KcGLA.png[/img] Anyone remember this? They put a lot of special effort into Battlelog for us, that makes it really different from the console verisons.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.