• Border patrol finds AK47 Assault Rifle
    74 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Crimor;37717053]It was a m(ac)-10 not an UZI by the way :v:[/QUOTE] they look close enough to mistake however. AK47 is way different. just like you could mistake magnums with eachother, or carbines.
She's a CBP Supervisory Officer. I can think of a million and one reasons why it's important for her to know at least the difference between an AK-47 and a machine pistol.
[QUOTE=Crimor;37717053]It was a m(ac)-10 not an UZI by the way :v:[/QUOTE] It takes me a while to decipher an Uzi from a Mac.
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;37717348]There's kind of a fucking difference between a rifle that can hit someone at up to 600 yards away and puncture body armor, and a pistol that's built for close quarters self defense. If she misclassified it, she's not doing her job properly, since the defense can immediately use that against the prosecution in the case. Also, why do you have to make every post of yours an insult when it comes to " gun nuts' homoerotic attachment to guns "? We aren't making that big of a deal, we were laughing until people like you show up.[/QUOTE] Her job is not to know the specifics of guns. If she was a detective or ATF agent or someone who is supposed to understand the classification of firearms, then yeah, that would be a failing. And don't give me that shit, the amount of raging unnecessary freakouts over small things by gun obsessive people is astounding. In a photograph if a person don't have proper trigger disipline, they freak out, refer to it as a clip as opposed to a magazine, they freak the fuck out, call a shotgun shell a bullet, they flip out. You can't POSSIBLY deny that gun nuts get exceptionally overly offended at the concept of someone NOT knowing every stupid little detail about a gun. [editline]18th September 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=OvB;37717463]She's a CBP Supervisory Officer. I can think of a million and one reasons why it's important for her to know at least the difference between an AK-47 and a machine pistol.[/QUOTE] Depends on what she does. There's barely any info in this video about her job.
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;37718226]Her job is not to know the specifics of guns. If she was a detective or ATF agent or someone who is supposed to understand the classification of firearms, then yeah, that would be a failing. And don't give me that shit, the amount of raging unnecessary freakouts over small things by gun obsessive people is astounding. In a photograph if a person don't have proper trigger disipline, they freak out, refer to it as a clip as opposed to a magazine, they freak the fuck out, call a shotgun shell a bullet, they flip out. You can't POSSIBLY deny that gun nuts get exceptionally overly offended at the concept of someone NOT knowing every stupid little detail about a gun. [editline]18th September 2012[/editline] Depends on what she does. There's barely any info in this video about her job.[/QUOTE] I know next to nothing about guns and even I think she's dumb. It seems that you're the one who needs to calm down.
every once in a while i'll see TiP post something smart and think "wow that's a pretty good point" and i'll start thinking ok of him and then he'll pull stupid shit like this thread and i hate his ass all over again
[QUOTE=thisispain;37708420] yeah that is pretty irrelevant. you have no way to prove that a specific casing came from a specific gun. not to mention the person in charge of evidence doesn't do anything except administration.[/QUOTE] actually yeah they can
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;37718226]Her job is not to know the specifics of guns. If she was a detective or ATF agent or someone who is supposed to understand the classification of firearms, then yeah, that would be a failing. And don't give me that shit, the amount of raging unnecessary freakouts over small things by gun obsessive people is astounding. In a photograph if a person don't have proper trigger disipline, they freak out, refer to it as a clip as opposed to a magazine, they freak the fuck out, call a shotgun shell a bullet, they flip out. You can't POSSIBLY deny that gun nuts get exceptionally overly offended at the concept of someone NOT knowing every stupid little detail about a gun. [editline]18th September 2012[/editline] Depends on what she does. There's barely any info in this video about her job.[/QUOTE] If she didn't know anything about guns she shouldn't have tried to say "And here we have an AK47" etc etc.
[QUOTE=EcksDee;37720136]If she didn't know anything about guns she shouldn't have tried to say "And here we have an AK47" etc etc.[/QUOTE] she did, so what?
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;37717313]I understand gun nuts' homoerotic attachment to guns, but really this isn't that big of a deal, who gives a shit if she misclassified it?[/QUOTE] you shouldn't dis homoerotic gun attachments till you try them the new range of homoerotic tac lights is particularly good [editline]19th September 2012[/editline] and the homoerotic bipod isn't particularly bad either
[QUOTE=Uber|nooB;37721762]you shouldn't dis homoerotic gun attachments till you try them[/QUOTE] Is it wrong that this somehow gave me a mental image of a fleshlight duct-taped to a rifle?
Maybe I should take up weapon identification as a job for the police.
You're all wrong, it's an AKMS of course.
[QUOTE=Da Big Man;37722879]You're all wrong, it's an AKMS of course.[/QUOTE] But what if its a Special Operations MP5?
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;37721008]she did, so what?[/QUOTE] Well it either means she is incredibly dumb or thinks she knows stuff about weapons. Considering she was ON CAMERA.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.