Don't let the news forum see this.
[editline]23rd June 2012[/editline]
This really is hillarious, clearly none of these protestors have the slightest clue about how trade and markets work.
[editline]23rd June 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;36457757]Wow you know who they sound smarter than
the fuckfaces that staple teabags to their trucker hats.[/QUOTE]
I'd say they sound about the same. Keep defending your ideology instead of just agreeing that 99% of people who form together to protest for some agenda are typically fucking stupid.
When the "wall street" guy is trying to explain in a good manner, the Occupy people just go "Pfft yeah sure man"
Video really makes it look like some of the "protesters" don't really have a clue what they're protesting against, but instead they just yell out "99%" "1%".
[QUOTE=Bob_Namg;36459935]they are more likely to pick up and research information[/QUOTE]
HAH
HAHA
[editline]23rd June 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Strider*;36460907]
I'd say they sound about the same. Keep defending your ideology instead of just agreeing that 99% of people who form together to protest for some agenda are typically fucking stupid.[/QUOTE]
Oh boy here comes captain randroid
I, the guy sitting here and posting the lmaoist pics in lmao threads, am so much better than these people who are outside, and let me explain why:
[editline]23rd June 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Bob_Namg;36459935]
The Tea Partiers' main staple and image is that they are peacful and respective; that in mind,[/QUOTE]
Just because they're not yelling doesn't mean that they're good people. I'd call a message of socially conservative hate and bigotry way, way less "respectful" than being rude to riot cops.
[editline]23rd June 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=RobbL;36460487]What's this whole 'crazy liberal' business you have going on in the US anyway?[/QUOTE]
People who take political action make people who sit on their computers all day feel inferior, and so we need to attack them and their personalities in order to vindicate ourselves. As part of this strategy, I who loves to post reddit comics about and call people retards, am suddenly very offended when someone is rude to someone else.
[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;36461182]
Oh boy here comes captain randroid[/QUOTE]
Ad hominem.
[QUOTE=Strider*;36461341]Ad hominem.[/QUOTE]
It's just funny that you of all people would talk about "defending ideologies".
[QUOTE=POLOPOZOZO;36461359]It's just funny that you of all people would talk about "defending ideologies".[/QUOTE]
I don't blindly insist that tea party protesters sound more intelligent than socialist "revolutionaries".
[editline]23rd June 2012[/editline]
The key here is that the tea party doesn't properly represent free market liberals and the 99% doesn't properly represent socialist intellectuals.
Both groups are full of fucking dolts and anyone with half of a proper monkey brain could see this.
That is fantastic because you would also happen to be wrong.
Also when both groups started they did a much better job of representing something that is true.
[QUOTE=Strider*;36461341]Ad hominem.[/QUOTE]
If you don't want to be called "Captain Randroid" then maybe you shouldn't endlessly campaign for your vile ideology of "fuck you, got mine"?
I thought you libertarians were supposed to be all about personal responsibility?
[editline]23rd June 2012[/editline]
I mean you call people "fucking stupid" and then immediately get upset when someone lobs "ad hominem" at you. You can have your morally bankrupt belief system, just don't be such a big baby.
I'm calling them fucking stupid for something they've done. Engage me on my ideas, not this image you have of me.
Please explain how I have a morally bankrupt belief system? Do you believe in universal human values?
[editline]23rd June 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;36461451]your vile ideology of "fuck you, got mine"?[/quote]
My ideology is far from that, I just don't believe in any political or philosophical system that validates theft or force.
fuckin leftards dont know that thomas jefferson himself once said that you gotta protect your rights to kill black people and own guns and thats what i believe in, fuck these people who want equality because that just leads to communism and gays ruling the world
They don't care about equality, they just want the fruits of corporate production.
[editline]23rd June 2012[/editline]
And Thomas Jefferson was never a fan of slavery, pay more attention in history.
[QUOTE=Strider*;36461651]They don't care about equality, they just want the fruits of corporate production.
[editline]23rd June 2012[/editline]
And Thomas Jefferson was never a fan of slavery, pay more attention in history.[/QUOTE]
yeah man fuck the blacks and gays, down with the leftards these cunts just want to occupy my HARD EARNED MONEY
[QUOTE=Bobie;36461679]yeah man fuck the blacks and gays, down with the leftards these cunts just want to occupy my HARD EARNED MONEY[/QUOTE]
Are you even trying to come up with a cognitive argument? How does this economic debate have anything to do with blacks or gays? Have I ever once said anything relating to either group? When you get into discussions in real life do you come up with shit like this? I see you're trying to be funny but you shouldn't misconstrue someone's ideas. Argue with substance.
[QUOTE=Strider*;36461533]
My ideology is far from that, I just don't believe in any political or philosophical system that validates theft or force.[/QUOTE]
The perpetuation of property rights necessitates the use of force.
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;36461935]The perpetuation of property rights necessitates the use of force.[/QUOTE]
For defence.
[QUOTE=don818;36443413]Thought almost all of FP was liberal retards.[/QUOTE]
I get the feeling that most of Facepunch is left leaning. Characterized by being in favor of market regulation/ increased government regulation, while being more liberal on social issues like gay marriage and drug legalization.
I try to stay quiet on libertarianism/anarcho-capitalism/minarchism because most of the time people just rate dumb and don't respond.
[QUOTE=Strider*;36461957]For defence.[/QUOTE]
Nope, that's a circular argument. You only have property to "defend" if you have the concept of property rights, which in turn requires the use of force.
The act of owning property is the act of using force to deny the use of that property to others.
[QUOTE=Bob_Namg;36459935]
There mainly is no difference in party systems, they are all the same. But progressive agendas and such are the primary promotion to the so proclaimed "left leaning" ideology that taints the worldwide common political system(s).
Washington was right when he said political parties would seperate and be the downfall of us. :/[/QUOTE]
wait what the hell are you saying? liberal taint... what? agendas? jews did 9/11?
my point is in America you can't really have someone who is both economically conservative and socially liberal (aka pro gay rights and pro choice but against taxes and healthcare), or vice versa, who has a party / candidate to vote for.
[QUOTE=Strider*;36460907]This really is hillarious, clearly none of these protestors have the slightest clue about how trade and markets work.[/QUOTE]
Neither do you strider, you've demonstrated that multiple times.
[editline]23rd June 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Strider*;36461377]I don't blindly insist that tea party protesters sound more intelligent than socialist "revolutionaries".
[editline]23rd June 2012[/editline]
The key here is that the tea party doesn't properly represent free market liberals and the 99% doesn't properly represent socialist intellectuals.
Both groups are full of fucking dolts and anyone with half of a proper monkey brain could see this.[/QUOTE]
OWS isn't a socialist group though.
[editline]23rd June 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Strider*;36461651]They don't care about equality, they just want the fruits of corporate production.
[editline]23rd June 2012[/editline]
And Thomas Jefferson was never a fan of slavery, pay more attention in history.[/QUOTE]
Then why did he own slaves?
guys cmon.. jefferson may have participated in the enslavement of another race which still affects our society negatively today, but like, he wasn't a dick about it
you know what they say
it's okay to own a slave, if you just behave
There are obviously going to be some loud morons in every event. But let's just ignore the fact that they are taking a stand for a living wage.
"Never argue with stupid people. They'll bring you down to their level and beat you with experience"
The thing that made me the most mad, was how they treated the building security guard/watchman.
"Your a sellout! You are a sellout to the banks and the government!"
The hell? He's trying to keep a job down, how is he harming you.
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;36464255]The thing that made me the most mad, was how they treated the building security guard/watchman.
"Your a sellout! You are a sellout to the banks and the government!"
The hell? He's trying to keep a job down, how is he harming you.[/QUOTE]
Anyone who works is a sellout in their eyes.
[QUOTE=Combin0wnage;36465774]Anyone who works is a sellout in their eyes.[/QUOTE]
Yes you're totally right*
*Actually you're completely fucking wrong and you should feel bad for making an idiotic statement about a movement you have absolutely no idea anything about.
[editline]24th June 2012[/editline]
You know what the problem with this is? This video literally takes a small amount of people out of thousands, and edits them to look stupid and crazy and then goes "SEE, this is the entire movement!" And you idiots buy into this shit - This is the same reason Andrew Breitbart was considered such a hero, because people are gullible.
[QUOTE=salmonmarine;36464242]"Never argue with stupid people. They'll bring you down to their level and beat you with experience"[/QUOTE]
Pretty much the gist of it.
[QUOTE=thrawn2787;36462454]wait what the hell are you saying? liberal taint... what? agendas? jews did 9/11?
my point is in America you can't really have someone who is both economically conservative and socially liberal (aka pro gay rights and pro choice but against taxes and healthcare), or vice versa, who has a party / candidate to vote for.[/QUOTE]
Stop thinking inside the box, you'll starve your mind.
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;36462013]Nope, that's a circular argument. You only have property to "defend" if you have the concept of property rights, which in turn requires the use of force.
The act of owning property is the act of using force to deny the use of that property to others.[/QUOTE]
Sure, I'll let some burly 42 year old dolt in the drug trade come inside, rape my children and wife, murder them, putting their heads on pikes on the side of a highway because he was bored.
[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;36461252] Just because they're not yelling doesn't mean that they're good people. I'd call a message of socially conservative hate and bigotry way, way less "respectful" than being rude to riot cops.
[/QUOTE]
Prove your arguement.
[QUOTE=Bob_Namg;36474609]
Sure, I'll let some burly 42 year old dolt in the drug trade come inside, rape my children and wife, murder them, putting their heads on pikes on the side of a highway because he was bored.[/QUOTE]
Because surely this is a common practise.
I'M THE 50%
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
