• The 911 Conspiracy Theory Explained in 5 Minutes
    331 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Cloak Raider;36390870]so that post by governor goblin basically destroyed this video utterly impressive[/QUOTE] Waste of a Monday, but I think I got my point across. Really I only did it because Lotus was taunting me. [editline]18th June 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=Trumple;36390905]The thing that gets me is the hard fact about the 3 towers that went down with 2 planes[/QUOTE] It's not a hard fact my darling trumple. Two planes took down two towers, and those two towers took out a good 10 buildings. One of which was WTC7
Please help giving dumb ratings to the OP. He needs far more, so that the thread wouldn't have a 'winner' list in the thread list.
[QUOTE=lotusking;36386368]which is why there are a bunch of other bills that are popping up that basically do the same shit sopa was going to do.[/QUOTE] yeah 11 years after 9/11 and the us government is being pressured by the entertainment industry to crack down on piracy OPEN YOUR EYES SHEEPLE SOPA IS PROOF 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB
[QUOTE=Jurikuer;36390482]Okay fair enough. But they had plenty of time to figure out there was a huge problem. Especially with passengers calling in a hijacking as it was happening.[/QUOTE] Except they didn't have time at all. The first jets sent to intercept Flight 11, the first to hit the world trade center, weren't alerted until 12 minutes before impact, and were weren't airborne until less than a minute before impact, still in Massachusetts, and weren't even aware of the subsequent hijackings until it was too late. By the time the jets were in Manhattan airspace, the third plane was about to hit the pentagon. Flight 93 was the only flight where there was enough time to intercept the plane, because it took off 40 minutes late due to runway congestion, although it ended up not being necessary to intercept the plane.
the amount of sarcasm in the OP's video is horrendous
[QUOTE=Governor Goblin;36390541] It's no where said if a plane goes missing for an hour that you need to prepare to shoot it down. Planes aren't always 100% on radar, they do eventually go out of site, and you attempt to contact them. Of course they start to worry, but do you think they fucking EXPECTED this kind of thing happening? It's not far fetched for control to lose track of planes for small periods of time. [/QUOTE] Also none of the planes were airborne for more than an hour after being hijacked. The "over an hour" bit is a complete lie. Flight 11: Hijacked 8:14, Crashed 8:46 Flight 175:Hijacked 8:42-8:46, Crashed 9:03 Flight 77: Hijacked 8:54, Crashed 9:37 Flight 93: Hijacked 9:28, Crashed 10:03
Governor Goblin you just saved us from having to do a lot of work. Thanks.
I don't get why people are still arguing over this issue its done and done ITS 2012 WE HAVE BETTER CONSPIRACY TO GO ON ABOUT Like the end of the world and etc
[QUOTE=Pantz76;36386409]9/11 conspiracy theorists are very good at deciphering the tiny details about the event itself. What they fail to do time and time again is find a reasonable motive for why the US government would have committed the attacks.[/QUOTE] Perhaps the US government made it appear that way on purpose? How to cover up ur secrets 101
[QUOTE=BROSEPH;36392029]Perhaps the US government made it appear that way on purpose?[/QUOTE] not sure if you're being sarcastic or not but that seems like exactly the kind of thing delusional conspiracy theorists would say
Has anyone seen this video before? [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G43zl4fzDQg[/media] It's basically a 90 minute video of a former CIA Asset (one who was in charge of sending and receiving messages between the United States and Iraq or any other country) who basically shares her side of the story of what she saw and experienced during the time of 9/11. I wouldn't say she knows the truth, she only tells her side of the story through her own eyes, so none of it is conspiracy related bullshit, she just explains her story. I don't doubt anything she says though. Apparently she's waited 10 years to say this due to legal troubles and all that. She starts talking at around 7:00 if you're going to watch it.
[QUOTE=cccritical;36392055]not sure if you're being sarcastic or not but that seems like exactly the kind of thing delusional conspiracy theorists would say[/QUOTE] Actually it sounds like you are just not very tactical or intellectually deficient to be (sadly) honest - but that's my opinion. If I were hell-bent on covering something up, the first thing I would do is throw off whoever was trying to bust me. In this case, the gullible American public.
[QUOTE=BROSEPH;36392585]Actually it sounds like you are just not very tactical or intellectually deficient to be (sadly) honest - but that's my opinion. If I were hell-bent on covering something up, the first thing I would do is throw off whoever was trying to bust me. In this case, the gullible American public.[/QUOTE] He's not tactical, eh? Too bad... [editline]18th June 2012[/editline] at least he isn't intellectually deficient.
[QUOTE=BROSEPH;36392585]Actually it sounds like you are just not very tactical or intellectually deficient to be (sadly) honest - but that's my opinion. If I were hell-bent on covering something up, the first thing I would do is throw off whoever was trying to bust me. In this case, the gullible American public.[/QUOTE] don't forget the tens of thousands of co-conspirators liable to leak information
jews did 911
[QUOTE=abcpea2;36393128]jews did 911[/QUOTE] Actually it was the Belgians.
This thread is just endlessly entertaining to read.
[QUOTE=fredstin22;36393937]It was obviously done by crazy Australians[/QUOTE] Naa, it was one Belgian businessman who wanted to cause a recession by destroying the WTC, thereby crippling trade for a short period of time. However, the US government then extended the life of the economy because of 9/11, and that's why the most recent recession hit harder than it should have. The Belgian wanted to cause a recession so it would devalue the Euro, so then he could easily buy up all the businesses he wanted with all the gold he has. However, the Belgian died in late 2010, and all the information was passed on to his long lost son, Barack Obama, so then Barack knew that he had to strike on Osama who was no longer under the hidden protection of the Belgian businessman.
Guys guys, I know how we can solve this. Just check the Mayan calender!
[QUOTE=abcpea2;36393128]jews did 911[/QUOTE] This is actually one of the leading theories on a lot of Truther websites. Along with the bigotry that goes with it.
[QUOTE=fredstin22;36393937]It was obviously done by crazy Australians[/QUOTE] It's always the one you suspect the least. Finland.
I like how a lot of people think that "Yeah, there's a couple of things that just seem out of place I guess" = "OMG GOVERNMENT DID IT, ALL LIES TO CONTROL US, POLICE STATE". Edit: nevermind, it was Finland.
It was me. I funded Osama.
tl;dr no one here knows what happened because the fascist police state won't tell us you don't know, you'll never know. Deal with it [editline]19th June 2012[/editline] get back to work, civilian
9/11 conspirators here? wow, I didn't realize how many people here are gullible. The whole idea that the U.S is behind 9/11 is fucking laughable.
[QUOTE=Laferio;36395616]9/11 conspirators here? wow, I didn't realize how many people here are gullible. The whole idea that the U.S is behind 9/11 is fucking laughable.[/QUOTE] Yes, I can see you have it all figured out, because you're providing so many answers.
[QUOTE=PowerBall v1;36395679]Yes, I can see you have it all figured out, because you're providing so many answers.[/QUOTE] Read Governor Goblin's post at the top of this page.
[QUOTE=Apache249;36395889]Read Governor Goblin's post at the top of this page.[/QUOTE] What about it?
[QUOTE=PowerBall v1;36395679]Yes, I can see you have it all figured out, because you're providing so many answers.[/QUOTE] It's so much easier to laugh at conspiracy nuts who attack sane people for not providing evidence that apparently can't read the first post of the page
[QUOTE=PowerBall v1;36395679]Yes, I can see you have it all figured out, because you're providing so many answers.[/QUOTE] Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, every post you've made seems to not understand this.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.