Goldeneye wii "Behind the scenes" or otherwise known as "How I just killed goldeneye"
63 replies, posted
Everyone knows this will be shit. Nothing can compare to the original Goldeneye. My childhood rehashed, great...
Everyone who wants a complete HD remake look at how Goldeneye Source turned out.
[QUOTE=Gengar;25095320]Oh Jesus. No fucking shit.
If anyone ever believed, that this game would be any good, then he's a total dipshit.
It was clear from the beginning that this was only being made because the original was good.[/QUOTE]
Are you being sarcastic? I can't tell.
If you are, then you are a quite a dipshit yourself.
They are trying to expand the game onto new horizons, not completely re-do it for no reason. Quit whining about how much nostalgia you feel ,because it's not going to affect the game's quality.
This looks fun and I predict FP will bandwagon hate this like a lot of people did with Fallout 3
"oh yeah I guess it's an okay game... if you consider the fact that it's DIFFERENT FROM THE OTHER ONES [b]BETHESDA YOU TRAITORS[/b]" etc
[editline]10:09PM[/editline]
[img]http://gyazo.com/5f0ff58022e8aa3ec11c5437c60331e4.png[/img]
[img_thumb]http://gyazo.com/59da1b4b969cf1b2b2930cd4009312ef.png[/img_thumb]
so everybody shut the fuck up
[QUOTE=RichyZ;25102452]well except fallout 3 fucking sucked in every regard due to the shitty ass engine and they changed the formula, from alright turned based combat to the worst fps combat ever[/QUOTE]
point in case
[QUOTE=RichyZ;25102517]it wasn't a re-imagining of the game because it was meant to be a direct sequel, argument debunked.[/QUOTE]
Well yeah, obviously.
[QUOTE=DaCommie1;25093789]Also, why the hell did they model Craig in a game "based" off a Brosnan film?[/QUOTE]
Brosnan's contract legally binding him to the Bond franchise is most likely long over. However, Craig is probably trademarked under the Bond name, so it is just simpler and less expensive to put him in than to get Brosnan's legal consent to place him into the game, probably resulting in him getting some cut of the profits. Besides, he's no longer "Bond," in a present sense, and this is apparently not a remake, but a "re-imagining," so it's basically being treated as if they had it developed at the current time, not before.
I'll buy this game, and i'll probably enjoy it.
I still hate Daniel Craig as Bond though, no matter what.
Their imagination is wrong :downs:
But seriously, I dislike the new golden eye and they have done...guess some people will like it, but I think i wont.
This game is going to be fucking terrible. This isn't Goldeneye.
It doesn't look too bad, its just that they call it Goldeneye.
It's like having it on Wii is adding insult to injury.
I don't like the fact they took a successful game and changed random things. Such as the solar plant. I understand "re-imagining" but considering most of the content is pretty much the same, it seems pointless and inconsistent. Regardless I might buy it and play it on my sister's wii.
I want a Bond theme video game souly about Timothy Dalton riding down snow slopes in a cello case being chased by evil Russians.
I just want to give some Wii related insight: I think the Wii's graphical capability isn't that great because Nintendo designed the Wii for Nintendo games. When you think about Nintendo games, you realize that they don't need a graphical work horse like your PC or PS3. They just need some simple textured polygons to make all the Marios and all the Zeldas.
The lack of AA is obvious.
Gonna pass on this game.
[QUOTE=Frisk;25104847]The lack of AA is obvious.
Gonna pass on this game.[/QUOTE]
"no AA? gameplay must be horrible"
Boo woo, change. It looks great, stop whining. Everything doesn't have to be exactly like the first. What's the point if it's the same game with slightly updated visuals?
This make makes me want to buy a Wii.
Does not deserve the Goldeneye name. Why not some other name instead
This looks awesome. Obvious rent for me
[QUOTE=TicTac;25093741]The graphics look the same.[/QUOTE]
Wat?
[img]http://bulk2.destructoid.com/ul/177524-header.jpg[/img][img]http://unrealitymag.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/goldeneye.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Tk1138;25113602]This looks awesome. Obvious rent for me
Wat?
[img_thumb]http://bulk2.destructoid.com/ul/177524-header.jpg[/img_thumb][img_thumb]http://unrealitymag.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/goldeneye.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
Yeah the n64 graphics are far better I agree.
[QUOTE=ketchup;25113647]Yeah the n64 graphics are far better I agree.[/QUOTE]
The Wii graphics look better :S
Yes I know you're being sarcastic.
god damn even for wii that is one ugly ass game
Wow, Nintendo stopped the Xbox 360 version to make this? Ew
Plot hole.
[sp]Your buddy didn't die, he escaped.[/sp]
[QUOTE=minilandstan;25118501]Plot hole.
[sp]Your buddy didn't die, he escaped.[/sp][/QUOTE]
Spoilers:
[sp]They faked his death[/sp]
[QUOTE=NateN34;25116620]Wow, Nintendo stopped the Xbox 360 version to make this? Ew[/QUOTE]
Nintendo is not making this (why the fuck would they), Activision is publishing it.
Why the hell did they decide naming it Goldeneye was a good idea? If they just made up a new name no one would be complaining. I think it actually looks pretty good, especially since there is only one real Goldeneye.
I'm tired of hearing that old cliche shit in stealthy games: "Do I be stealthy, or go in guns blazing" like it hasn't been done before.
Nothing will replace the original and the graphics are bad even for a Wii game.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.