To be fair, the graphics were dated even back in 2003
[QUOTE=Marphy Black;45062859]We considered many routes for this trailer[b]*[/b]: from a fully pre-rendered cinematic that offered zero look into what the game would actually look like, to a dressed-up "target render" full of eye candy and effects that would all end up conspicuously missing come the actual game release. However, that all seems rather dishonest on the developer's part. Could you imagine a game company trying to pull a fast one on the consumers like that? Deliberately creating a misleading game trailer? Totally unthinkable, don't you agree?
Thus, we took the route that was clearly the only right choice: utilize genuine in-game gameplay with the bona fide in-game assets. This is ultimately what the players, the average schlubs like you and I, care about, and that's who we aim to deliver to. The clips in the trailer came completely unaltered from the captured footage on my hard drive, so you're seeing a true and honest representation of the game itself (aside from being in an unfinished state at the moment! PRE-ALPHA-BETA-DELTA GAMEPLAY WORK-IN-PROGRESS NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF FINAL GAME QUALITY).
[b]*[/b][sp]P.S. This is not true. In-game footage all the way, baby![/sp][/QUOTE]
Doesn't change the fact that it is 2014 and there are indie games with superior graphics. I am not a graphics whore, but it just smells after lazyness here.
[QUOTE=Impact1986;45063548]Doesn't change the fact that it is 2014 and there are indie games with superior graphics. I am not a graphics whore, but it just smells after lazyness here.[/QUOTE]
you're a graphics whore
[QUOTE=Impact1986;45063548]Doesn't change the fact that it is 2014 and there are indie games with superior graphics. I am not a graphics whore, but it just smells after lazyness here.[/QUOTE]
You do understand this is some dlc for a game from 2003, right?
[QUOTE=Impact1986;45063548]Doesn't change the fact that it is 2014 and there are indie games with superior graphics. I am not a graphics whore, but it just smells after lazyness here.[/QUOTE]
Graphics are irrelevant project zomboid is just fine as is bastion which are also indie titles, it's not like i played postal for graphics it's all the silly business and goofy gameplay. Could you even imagine how postal 2 would be if it was running on cry engine, it would strange as fuck.
[QUOTE=Impact1986;45063548]Doesn't change the fact that it is 2014 and there are indie games with superior graphics. I am not a graphics whore, but it just smells after lazyness here.[/QUOTE]
It's not laziness at all. People want more Postal 2, people are getting more Postal 2. RWS are giving people what they want.
Using all them new graphics would become costly and it would be hard to recreate something that feels and looks like it is related at all to Postal 2, I mean all new Doom games for example doesn't live up to the older ones and they feel like whole different game, only thing that they share is name.
Also it is a dlc and also it is aimed for Postal 2 fans and what would Postal 2 fans want more than Postal 2 itself?
0:45
That's the voice actor of the Dude in Postal 3
[sp]i'm hoping the postal dude has a split personality or some shit[/sp]
Also note: postal 2 and PL are made on a significantly lower budget than most indie games, and a lot of the devs are volunteers doing it out of love
Apparently the game will be a Monday-Friday kind of deal like the main game, with apocalyptic tasks in an apocalyptic Paradise.
[editline]10th June 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=layla;45062838]I bet if I was to guess the age of each person there, I'd be surprisingly accurate.[/QUOTE]
Noticed any PC announcement has been met with bitching since GTA5 was announced for PC.
How did I miss this I am so exited.
[QUOTE=Impact1986;45063548]Doesn't change the fact that it is 2014 and there are indie games with superior graphics. I am not a graphics whore, but it just smells after lazyness here.[/QUOTE]
LOLOLOLOL clearly you know nothing of game development cost vs benefit. We have the game and the assets and the ability to quickly create an add-on for p2, SOMETHING NOONE DOES TO 12 YEAR OLD TITLES. we sold a ton of copies of P2 on steam last year and what better way to reward all these new POSTAL 2 players with DLC for the game they purchased. Sorry you don't appreciate our efforts but something tells me you could give two shits about what we do no matter what we do!
[QUOTE=mikejaret;45065987]LOLOLOLOL clearly you know nothing of game development cost vs benefit. We have the game and the assets and the ability to quickly create an add-on for p2, SOMETHING NOONE DOES TO 12 YEAR OLD TITLES. we sold a ton of copies of P2 on steam last year and what better way to reward all these new POSTAL 2 players with DLC for the game they purchased. Sorry you don't appreciate our efforts but something tells me you could give two shits about what we do no matter what we do![/QUOTE]
you go, girl
[QUOTE=mikejaret;45065987]LOLOLOLOL clearly you know nothing of game development cost vs benefit. We have the game and the assets and the ability to quickly create an add-on for p2, SOMETHING NOONE DOES TO 12 YEAR OLD TITLES. we sold a ton of copies of P2 on steam last year and what better way to reward all these new POSTAL 2 players with DLC for the game they purchased. Sorry you don't appreciate our efforts but something tells me you could give two shits about what we do no matter what we do![/QUOTE]
I think I bought like 6 copies just to gift because it is the most underplayed game of the century
[QUOTE=mikejaret;45065987]Sorry you don't appreciate our efforts but something tells me you could give two shits about what we do no matter what we do![/QUOTE]
This really screams the truth. So many developers just try to pander to everyone but that never, ever works. They will always get shit on by someone, no matter how hard they try to please them. This usually just causes problems during the development cycle anyway, developers stretch themselves too thin over a large amount of features, so none of them really stand out as amazing.
IMO aside from the big cash cows like COD and Battlefield (Which are already losing popularity and public interest) games that offer way more to their niche community like Dark Souls, Super Meat Boy, Arma, and Killing Floor are almost universally acclaimed as outstanding titles.
Graphics whores are also the worst kinds of people too, side rant branching to side rant here. Unless the graphical fidelity of the game objectively subtracts play value then you really cannot beat down a game solely because of how it looks. Case in point: Watch_Dogs. All anyone did was shit on it for how it looked and how it was nothing like the trailers, but I'd say only 20% of the people complaining actually talked about the important stuff like the boring gunplay, ridiculous story, frustrating combat, and other gameplay features that failed to deliver.
[QUOTE=mikejaret;45065987]LOLOLOLOL clearly you know nothing of game development cost vs benefit. We have the game and the assets and the ability to quickly create an add-on for p2, SOMETHING NOONE DOES TO 12 YEAR OLD TITLES. we sold a ton of copies of P2 on steam last year and what better way to reward all these new POSTAL 2 players with DLC for the game they purchased. Sorry you don't appreciate our efforts but something tells me you could give two shits about what we do no matter what we do![/QUOTE]This is one of the reasons you guys have always been a favorite developer of mine. No fucks to give.
Is this free DLC or paid DLC? Not that it matters either way. I'd still get it.
The graphics in Postal 2 remind's me on the graphics found on PS2 games and that alone is what makes me love the game
So playing this when it comes out
[QUOTE=abananapeel;45068722]Is this free DLC or paid DLC? Not that it matters either way. I'd still get it.[/QUOTE]
Gonna be paid which is why they changed the name from Postal 2 Complete to Postal 2 on steam
tbh p2 is cool but the shooting mechanics feel downright awful to me. the level design and everything else is pretty cool, but what makes up the bulk of the game just doesn't feel fluid or fun. p2 could really use an update to its shooting and keeping everything else the same
For weird feeling shooting I would mostly blame the default FOV.
[QUOTE=Dr. Ocsid;45062588][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/vU2HK8t.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/iVdja0I.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/9EZFuzM.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/fJo6Sbe.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ktNAIx1.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/HmGR0Ha.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/msD0eIV.png[/IMG]
aaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAGH[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]RusGay19 hours ago
Nice and low quality, just like nobody wants.•[/QUOTE]
his description is
[QUOTE]I'm a big troll. • I also happen to be a giant homosexual. U mad?[/QUOTE]
self proclaimed "Troll"
[QUOTE=Impact1986;45063548]Doesn't change the fact that it is 2014 and there are indie games with superior graphics. I am not a graphics whore, but it just smells after lazyness here.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.roblox.com/User.aspx?ID=2900400[/url]
is this you?
because if it is that is fucking embarrassing.
[editline]11th June 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=mikejaret;45065987]LOLOLOLOL clearly you know nothing of game development cost vs benefit. We have the game and the assets and the ability to quickly create an add-on for p2, SOMETHING NOONE DOES TO 12 YEAR OLD TITLES. we sold a ton of copies of P2 on steam last year and what better way to reward all these new POSTAL 2 players with DLC for the game they purchased. Sorry you don't appreciate our efforts but something tells me you could give two shits about what we do no matter what we do![/QUOTE]
holy shit you are a god
[QUOTE=mikejaret;45065987]LOLOLOLOL clearly you know nothing of game development cost vs benefit. We have the game and the assets and the ability to quickly create an add-on for p2, SOMETHING NOONE DOES TO 12 YEAR OLD TITLES. we sold a ton of copies of P2 on steam last year and what better way to reward all these new POSTAL 2 players with DLC for the game they purchased. Sorry you don't appreciate our efforts but something tells me you could give two shits about what we do no matter what we do![/QUOTE]If you were to make any sweeping technological changes I'd want improvements to the animation and physics systems long before shaders or higher poly models or any of that garbage.
Motion is far more important than looking pretty. If anyone disagrees they're wrong.
Postal 2 with Euphoria physics and i'd never have to watch porn again
Real glad at the positive reaction!
Awwww yeeeeaaah
gimme. gimme now
[QUOTE=Squeegy Mackoy;45073690]If you were to make any sweeping technological changes I'd want improvements to the animation and physics systems long before shaders or higher poly models or any of that garbage.
Motion is far more important than looking pretty. If anyone disagrees they're wrong.[/QUOTE]
if we update it, it will be COMPLETELY redone from bottom to the top in a new engine!
[QUOTE=mikejaret;45078073]if we update it, it will be COMPLETELY redone from bottom to the top in a new engine![/QUOTE]
That sounds less like an update and more like one of those HD Remasters everyone's doing now.
[editline]12th June 2014[/editline]
I wonder if my pic or Postal's ass pic in Mike's office will change in this DLC.
As long as your remake is better than Postal 3 than go for it!
[QUOTE=mikejaret;45078073]if we update it, it will be COMPLETELY redone from bottom to the top in a new engine![/QUOTE]
I'm foaming at the mouth
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
