• Far Cry 3 gameplay trailer
    62 replies, posted
[QUOTE=The Vman;35233489]Looks like we may not have predator mode, but some other kind of mind-warpy super power. Looks like fun.[/QUOTE] Wrong. There's a mission where you journey into a cave that's full of hallucinogenics and you trip massive balls.
[QUOTE=alien_guy;35237463]Graphics look dissapointingly average looking compared to the image i had in my head from the original trailers.[/QUOTE] I always wonder what people like you [I]expect[/I] the graphics to look like.
Maybe it was just the low video quality, but there were some scenes that looked almost like they were ripped straight out of the first FarCry in that trailer. Of course, for every scene that looked like that (to me, at least) there were three that showcased and surpassed the beauty that FarCry 2 had. All in all, this looks fairly interesting. And like others have said, the ball-tripping moments look like they'd be just barrels of fun. I may end up getting FarCry 3 after all. I just hope the multiplayer has more variety than FarCry 2 did.
I'm hoping that was console footage or at least it was youtube that fucked up the quality
I really liked Far Cry 2. This one looks like it will be quite fun.
The gameplay definitely looks great, but... [img]http://puu.sh/lNYp[/img]
[QUOTE=Overv;35237923]The gameplay definitely looks great, but... -image[/QUOTE] Those two scenes were [b]exactly[/b] the scenes I was talking about. Like GhettoGeek said, I'm really hoping this was console footage. If not, I hope that's just dev content, and they intend to refine it all and make it pretty. The third sequel to a game, made in 2012, should not look worse than the original, released in 2004. That's just now how it works. Also, FarCry looks even better than I remembered. I was thinking those scenes looked ripped from FarCry, but no, they're even worse.
MAN I LOVE WHEN THE TRAILER CUTS EVERY 1 SECOND WITH THE INCEPTION HORN YOU WOULDN'T TO SEE ANY OF THAT SHOOTING WOULD YOU! JUST LIKE THE BATTLEFIELD TRAILERS I LOVED THOSE TOO!
shroom simulator 2012
Got some screenshots of the nifty guns in this trailer. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/oi3Ao.png[/IMG] Kriss Super V [img][URL]http://i.imgur.com/RXOrT.png[/URL][/img] Some sort of 1911 variant. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/KhpXN.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/1XUew.png[/IMG] AKM or AK-74 with a 7.62 mag, that has rails for maximum tactical sights. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/D6sPt.png[/IMG] Ironsights for an AR. Neat.
Ugh... Ubisoft They'll manage to fuck it somehow, they always do.
[QUOTE=thrawn2787;35233463]inception foghorn really is everywhere. at least with inception it had something to do with the plot[/QUOTE] you know that was around before inception right [editline]21st March 2012[/editline] this looks fucking awesome, number 2 on my list for 2012 i hope they have a map editor
[QUOTE=milkandcooki;35238112]Got some screenshots of the nifty guns in this trailer. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/oi3Ao.png[/IMG] Kriss Super V [img][URL]http://i.imgur.com/RXOrT.png[/URL][/img] Some sort of 1911 variant. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/KhpXN.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/1XUew.png[/IMG] AKM or AK-74 with a 7.62 mag, that has rails for maximum tactical sights. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/D6sPt.png[/IMG] Ironsights for an AR. Neat.[/QUOTE] The only reason the AK has rails is because you can mount sights on it. Also, that 1911 variant is a Kimber Warrior. Also, that AK is actually an AK-103.
[QUOTE=Overv;35237923]The gameplay definitely looks great, but... [img]http://puu.sh/lNYp[/img][/QUOTE] The aesthetic is the same, but if you can't see the massive difference in graphics you must be blind. Considering the far more detailed textures, higher geometry on the trees, massively improved water, better shading and atmospherics. Why is it surprising that a sequel to a game has the same look and feel as the original. From what I recall people complained that FC2 didn't take place on an island like the old ones, now you guys are complaining that it's brought back the Far Cry look? What do you people want? [editline]21st March 2012[/editline] I mean, hell I can do the same thing: [img]http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/2530/cmonman.jpg[/img] And this one's more similar too.
[QUOTE=BlazeFresh;35237279]the drugs seem a little pointless i thought it was gonna be like far cry instincts[/QUOTE] It's a side mission. It's to add something unique to the game instead of SHOOT KILL STAB 50x over.
[QUOTE=The Vman;35238851]The aesthetic is the same, but if you can't see the massive difference in graphics you must be blind. Considering the far more detailed textures, higher geometry on the trees, massively improved water, better shading and atmospherics.[/QUOTE] You [b]do[/b] realize that FarCry 3 is the game on the [b]left[/b], right? And not the right?
[QUOTE=Gmod4ever;35239584]You [b]do[/b] realize that FarCry 3 is the game on the [b]left[/b], right? And not the right?[/QUOTE] Yes. Do you?
[QUOTE=Gmod4ever;35239584]You [b]do[/b] realize that FarCry 3 is the game on the [b]left[/b], right? And not the right?[/QUOTE] are you retarded far cry 3 looks lightyears better than far cry quit trying to find reasons to bitch, jesus
Far Cry is obviously far superior to Far Cry 3 in terms of fidelity. [img]http://media.giantbomb.com/uploads/0/9804/1809913-voss_super.jpg[/img] [img]http://images.wikia.com/farcry/images/8/8c/Colonelcrowe.jpg[/img] Doesn't even compare.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/Ku9X6l.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/images/12/feb/Far_Cry.jpg[/img] yes obviously the original far cry has the better graphics
It's not in here, but the sound of clicking on the armoury in the original Starcraft was used everywhere. I even heard it in a trailer for a season of Lost.
After I saw the shark I knew this was a day one purchase. I really hope they bring back the map creator and allow the use of the animals.
[QUOTE=tier56;35238850]The only reason the AK has rails is because you can mount sights on it. Also, that 1911 variant is a Kimber Warrior. Also, that AK is actually an AK-103.[/QUOTE] Thanks for the info. I'm pretty smart when it comes to AKs, but the 10X variants confuse the fuck out of me.
[QUOTE=The Vman;35238851]The aesthetic is the same, but if you can't see the massive difference in graphics you must be blind. Considering the far more detailed textures, higher geometry on the trees, massively improved water, better shading and atmospherics. Why is it surprising that a sequel to a game has the same look and feel as the original. From what I recall people complained that FC2 didn't take place on an island like the old ones, now you guys are complaining that it's brought back the Far Cry look? What do you people want? [editline]21st March 2012[/editline] I mean, hell I can do the same thing: [img]http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/2530/cmonman.jpg[/img] And this one's more similar too.[/QUOTE] It does definitely look better than Far Cry, but a few scenes just look exceptionally bad for a game of this age [i]and[/i] especially compared to the other scenes and Far Cry 2 overall.
care to be specific?
Remember how absofuckinlutely beautiful Crysis was when it came out? It'd be nice to see a similiar jump forward in game graphics again.
[QUOTE=Str4fe;35248779]Remember how absofuckinlutely beautiful Crysis was when it came out? It'd be nice to see a similiar jump forward in game graphics again.[/QUOTE] We're coming close to perfection, I don't think it's ever going to happen again.
[QUOTE=Mr.Cookie;35248808]We're coming close to perfection, I don't think it's ever going to happen again.[/QUOTE] I can still easily look at an image/video footage and tell if its real life or a video game. We are not really coming close to perfection, when it becomes hard to tell the difference, then we are near imo.
[QUOTE=Str4fe;35248852]I can still easily look at an image/video footage and tell if its real life or a video game. We are not really coming close to perfection, when it becomes hard to tell the difference, then we are near.[/QUOTE] When it becomes hard to tell the difference is when we're already there.
[QUOTE=Mr.Cookie;35248893]When it becomes hard to tell the difference is when we're already there.[/QUOTE] When its impossible to tell the difference is when we're already there ;)
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.