• Minecraft – E3 2017 – 4K Trailer
    37 replies, posted
[QUOTE=J!NX;52343670]whats next pretending that the human eye can't see above 24fps?[/QUOTE] There's tools for recording Minecraft stuff with zero dropped frames. It could very well be non-realtime. Last time I tried extreme shader shit, it ran pretty bad on my GTX 680 - and that was in 1080p. Yes, the GTX 970 is stronger, but I don't think it's capable of 4K60fps with some of these very performance draining shader mods. [QUOTE=J!NX;52344797]playing minecraft without mods gets unbelievably stale after a short time[/QUOTE] I've only played vanilla forever. (apart from messing with shaders)
[QUOTE=Paul-Simon;52345492]There's tools for recording Minecraft stuff with zero dropped frames. It could very well be non-realtime. Last time I tried extreme shader shit, it ran pretty bad on my GTX 680 - and that was in 1080p. Yes, the GTX 970 is stronger, but I don't think it's capable of 4K60fps with some of these very performance draining shader mods.[/QUOTE] so you tried it on a 680 and that's how you know a 970, a far more powerful card isn't capable of doing it can you even comprehend your absolute lasp in logic is or are you actually serious come back when you've personally ran that exact mod with a 970 and had this supposed performance drain please [editline]12th June 2017[/editline] a 970 actually handles higher resolutions quite effectively btw
[QUOTE=J!NX;52345509]so you tried it on a 680 and that's how you know a 970, a far more powerful card isn't capable of doing it can you even comprehend your absolute lasp in logic is or are you actually serious[/QUOTE] No, I tried running it in 1080p on a GTX 680. 4K is literally 4 times the pixels - The difference between the cards isn't THAT big. The GTX 970 is around 50% more powerful than the 680, not 400+%. Explain to me the "lasp" in logic, because I'm not seeing it. [editline]o[/editline] Besides, it was recorded with [url=http://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/mapping-and-modding/minecraft-mods/1280148-minema-3-2-the-smooth-movie-recorder]Minema[/url] (specifically a non-real time recorder) and [url=http://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/mapping-and-modding/minecraft-mods/1282034-mineshot-1-7-high-resolution-screenshot-capturing]Mineshot[/url] (utility for recording at higher than native res). Doesn't exactly scream real-time to me. [editline]12th June 2017[/editline] Also I couldn't help but notice that the light rays were emanating from the wrong location in that trailer: [thumb]http://puu.sh/whJH7.png[/thumb] (contrast increased for extra visibility)
[QUOTE=Paul-Simon;52345520]No, I tried running it in 1080p on a GTX 680. 4K is literally 4 times the pixels - The difference between the cards isn't THAT big. The GTX 970 is around 50% more powerful than the 680, not 400+%. Explain to me the "lasp" in logic, because I'm not seeing it.[/QUOTE] Even if it isn't real time, with 10xx cards PC is pretty wildly stronger than an xbox It's not really reasonable to compare a pretty blatantly inferior outdated version (java) that is working on chewing gum and tape to a version that's specialized for a certain hardware If both versions were optimized equally and java wasn't a piece of shit, no one would have even brought it up now would they? They wouldn't, because that would be insanely dumb. The PC version would look and run better by virtue of having better access to hardware.
[QUOTE=J!NX;52345591]Even if it isn't real time, with 10xx cards PC is pretty wildly stronger than an xbox It's not really reasonable to compare a pretty blatantly inferior outdated version (java) that is working on chewing gum and tape to a version that's specialized for a certain hardware If both versions were optimized equally and java wasn't a piece of shit, no one would have even brought it up now would they? They wouldn't, because that would be insanely dumb. The PC version would look and run better by virtue of having better access to hardware.[/QUOTE] Won't we be getting this shader pack thing on the Windows 10 version anwyays? In any case, I wasn't arguing that - just arguing that the shaders have ran like shit on the java version in my experience, and that Tuskins claims weren't baseless.
[QUOTE=Paul-Simon;52345609]Won't we be getting this shader pack thing on the Windows 10 version anwyays? In any case, I wasn't arguing that - just arguing that the shaders have ran like shit on the java version in my experience, and that Tuskins claims weren't baseless.[/QUOTE] to be fair, if the w10 version is getting it as well then Tuskins point could very well be completely invalidated if they actually optimize it non-lazily
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.