[QUOTE=sheridanm;40459571]Blah blah blah Intel Blah blah blah tick tock blah blah blah AMD hard-on.
Nope.avi.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Stopper;40459570]If it costs $800, it'll compete with fuck-o if only a handful of people are buying it.[/QUOTE]
prices can change at any moment, if it doesn't have any performance gain (because no one optimizes fuck all for programs and 8 core CPUs) then it can be lower, but at the moment we don't even know if this'll have any other things added or anything, it's nothing from a bar of soap. So how the fuck do you know Mr. I'm-a-genius-go-with-intel-or-the-pope-will-molest-you?
[QUOTE=ac/14;40459581]It could be only slightly faster and still be a success. I think we are at the point where we wont see any real big jumps in performance. I mean I never really push my FX unless im rendering with all cores. However there are a ton of idiots out there who still believe that clock speed = performance and would eat this up simply because it runs at 5ghz.[/QUOTE]
I certainly hope it will be, but I doubt it. My money's on "look, we made a 5 ghz CPU".
[QUOTE=sheridanm;40459605]prices can change at any moment, if it doesn't have any performance gain (because no one optimizes fuck all for programs and 8 core CPUs) then it can be lower, but at the moment we don't even know if this'll have any other things added or anything, it's nothing from a bar of soap. So how the fuck do you know Mr. I'm-a-genius-go-with-intel-or-the-pope-will-molest-you?[/QUOTE]
You are so unbelievably stupid and misinformed.
I've said everything I can, so I'm leaving you to delude yourself into thinking how brilliant you are.
Oh god,we've got one of those threads where op argues with everyone because he got boxes,and he wont accept that. Sigh
[QUOTE=Stopper;40459631]You are so unbelievably stupid and misinformed.
I've said everything I can, so I'm leaving you to delude yourself into thinking how brilliant you are.[/QUOTE]
Says the person who hasn't even seen the released product for themselves because it was just announced and not actually released you ponce.
[QUOTE=sheridanm;40459571]Blah blah blah Intel Blah blah blah tick tock blah blah blah AMD hard-on.
Nope.avi.[/QUOTE]
Dragon banned sheridanm for 12 Hours in Okay lets try again with the reason “Whatever, just don't be an annoying asshole”
For someone on their last chance you sure seem to enjoy shitposting a lot.
[QUOTE=matty928;40459633]Oh god,we've got one of those threads where op argues with everyone because he got boxes,and he wont accept that. Sigh[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://www.facepunch.com/fp/ratings/box.png[/IMG]
But yeah typical cycle of Facepunch
[QUOTE=Alice3173;40459647]Dragon banned sheridanm for 12 Hours in Okay lets try again with the reason “Whatever, just don't be an annoying asshole”
For someone on their last chance you sure seem to enjoy shitposting a lot.[/QUOTE]
I don't even know how this ties in with this discussion...
[QUOTE=sheridanm;40459698]I don't even know how this ties in with this discussion...[/QUOTE]
It ties in with this discussion because the way you're posting is exactly what you were warned to [I]not[/I] do when you were unperma'd?
[QUOTE=Alice3173;40459725]It ties in with this discussion because the way you're posting is exactly what you were warned to [I]not[/I] do when you were unperma'd?[/QUOTE]
Yes but under the circumstances I don't see anyone else doing any better.
[QUOTE=Stopper;40459463]Listen, you dick - I don't know what your AMD hard-on is, but I'm trying to rationally discuss the topic at hand and you're just being an asshole.[/QUOTE]
See? How is that fair? You mention even anything remotely about AMD and it just [b]HAS[/b] to be about Intel being better, which doesn't make any sense since it should be a personal decision to make not dictated by some moronic figure in the distance waving their Intel fanboy badge at everyone.
I do admit I would go with AMD over Intel, but there's a reason for that, Intel's expensive. But for the sake of Haswell it's now affordable.
Wow, you are impossibly stupid sher.
This thread is teeming with idiocy.
[url]http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819113039[/url]
[url]http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819113039[/url]
And those are cheaper ones. AMD and Intel have processors costing thousands per individual unit.
This I suspect will just be like a server processor or something along those lines.
Hehe, thanks for the laugh guys, I needed it.
Video is bad, and honestly, I thought that AMD was dropping out of the CPU making business? I thought that they accepted that they couldn't compete with Intel? I could be wrong, correct me if I am.
I thought IBM had announced something along the lines of a 5.5 Ghz chip, or something that behaved liked that for some of their server environments.
It is supposed to be a high end workstation processor aimed to compete against the 3930k. They must have some very high binned processors that they are going to sell off in limited quantities to have a presence in the high end. It is pretty old news, but it is nice to see that it is coming soon.
[QUOTE=DONUT KING;40460690]Hehe, thanks for the laugh guys, I needed it.
Video is bad, and honestly, I thought that AMD was dropping out of the CPU making business? I thought that they accepted that they couldn't compete with Intel? I could be wrong, correct me if I am.[/QUOTE]
[url=http://www.brightsideofnews.com/Data/2013_3_6/Analysis-AMD-Kaveri-APU-and-Steamroller-x86-64-Architectural-Enhancements-Unveiled/AMD_high_performance_core_roadmap.jpg]Well, they still have a production map for developing further processors.[/url]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
