[QUOTE=Dori;36805576]female gender roles are almost entirely misogynist. I can't think of a single male gender role which can be considered misandrist[/QUOTE]
I'm not saying the role itself makes men look bad, I'm saying some men suffer because they are forced to conform to it, simply for being male.
Once again, shall we move over to mass debate?
nobody is asking you to contribute to this discussion. if you feel it warrants a MD thread, go and make one
[QUOTE=person11;36805561]Men can definitely be victims of the most minor annoyances while the livelihoods of non male people are eroded by institutional sexism.
There is no comparison between the problems of misandry and misogyny. There is a deep imbalance in society, and trying to solve the problems of the powerful and privileged will not restore that balance.[/QUOTE]
You can't opt out of citing your sources.
[QUOTE=thisispain;36805498]okay well why don't you source these custody rates.
because you're gonna have to prove as to misandry being the reason why males get less custody instead of males simply not seeking custody.
[/QUOTE]
I'm getting my custody rates from [url]http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/p60-237.pdf[/url] .
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;36805695]
I'm getting my custody rates from [url]http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/p60-237.pdf[/url] .[/QUOTE]
your custody rates don't prove anything. you'll have to do better.
[QUOTE=thisispain;36806264]your custody rates don't prove anything. you'll have to do better.[/QUOTE]
There haven't been any studies on it, but I can guarantee you that much more than 16% of men want their children when they divorce.
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;36806551]There haven't been any studies on it, but I can guarantee you that much more than 16% of men want their children when they divorce.[/QUOTE]
guess we'll just take your word for that then
[QUOTE=Kopimi;36806564]guess we'll just take your word for that then[/QUOTE]
It's reasonable to assume that most of them would want the children, otherwise they wouldn't be actually attempting to get custody in court.
He looks like a fat Adam Savage.
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;36806551]There haven't been any studies on it, but I can guarantee you[/QUOTE]
yeah so you're pulling it out of your smartass.
[QUOTE=thisispain;36789780]this is funny because i'm pretty sure more people will stop liking him because of this than that whole harassing a rape victim thing.
and by funny i mean very sad[/QUOTE]
Not a lot of people have heard about the rape victim stuff either.
I'm pretty sure he has not dedicated several videos to talk about that rape victim while he certainly has with the banana incident (which he had the balls to call bananagate, like he's THAT important), and even the banana thing remains unheard of for a lot of people.
Usually TAA fans don't stay fans for very long because they quickly find out about all the dumb shit he has done, including insulting a rape victim, filming himself shoving bananas up his ass, stealing money from people, burning religious books, and now selling out which is something he has probably already fucking destroyed in an earlier video or was probably planning to criticize if it wasn't for the fact he got asked to sell out himself.
[editline]17th July 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=chimitos;36806589]He looks like a fat Adam Savage.[/QUOTE]
He looks like a fat, unlikable, hateful Adam Savage on caffeine.
[QUOTE=thisispain;36806597]yeah so you're pulling it out of your smartass.[/QUOTE]
Then I challenge you to prove me the other way.
They wouldn't be making it to court if the father didn't want the child.
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;36806616]Then I challenge you to prove me the other way.
They wouldn't be making it to court if the father didn't want the child.[/QUOTE]
wrong
[url]http://www.amptoons.com/blog/files/Massachusetts_Gender_Bias_Study.htm[/url]
[quote]We began our investigation of child custody aware of a common perception that there is a bias in favor of women in these decisions. Our research contradicted this perception. Although mothers more frequently get primary physical custody of children following divorce, this practice does not reflect bias but rather the agreement of the parties and the fact that, in most families, mothers have been the primary [*748] caretakers of children. Fathers who actively seek custody obtain either primary or joint physical custody over 70% of the time. Reports indicate, however, that in some cases perceptions of gender bias may discourage fathers from seeking custody and stereotypes about fathers may sometimes affect case outcomes. In general, our evidence suggests that the courts hold higher standards for mothers than fathers in custody determinations.[/quote]
[quote]Fathers who actively seek custody obtain either primary or joint physical custody over 70% of the time.[/quote]
directly contradicts your claim
I thought this was a thread about TAA apparently it's a mass debate about gender roles and child custody, my bad.
[QUOTE=thisispain;36806634]wrong
[url]http://www.amptoons.com/blog/files/Massachusetts_Gender_Bias_Study.htm[/url]
directly contradicts your claim[/QUOTE]
That study was done in a single state, does not list its pool size (that I can see, feel free to prove me wrong) and was done in 1990.
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;36806672]That study was done in a single state, does not list its pool size (that I can see, feel free to prove me wrong) and was done in 1990.[/QUOTE]
and yet it is infinitely more evidence than you have provided
[QUOTE=Ganerumo;36806657]I thought this was a thread about TAA apparently it's a mass debate about gender roles and child custody, my bad.[/QUOTE]
this is a discussion about TAA being a misogynist
[QUOTE=Kopimi;36806681]and yet it is infinitely more evidence than you have provided[/QUOTE]
Not really, the study is extremely outdated and doesn't list how many people participated, and the pool was only taken from one state.
It's essentially invalid.
[editline]17th July 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Dori;36806685]this is a discussion about TAA being a misogynist[/QUOTE]
No it isn't. It was at one point, but it definitely isn't anymore.
sanius you were making sense at start of this shit but now you're just going full retard here
Sanius going full retard?
I can't even make a joke, it's a wonder why he ever got unbanned.
yeah it's also a wonder how people can keep flaming doriol over and over again without getting banned
sorry it's just really fucking annoying
[editline]17th July 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;36806696]Not really, the study is extremely outdated and doesn't list how many people participated, and the pool was only taken from one state.
It's essentially invalid.[/QUOTE]
please show me how the data could have possibly changed.
it's not up to you to dismiss something as invalid whenever you don't like it, you still haven't produced a single source. you might as well be trolling me.
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;36806696]Not really, the study is extremely outdated and doesn't list how many people participated, and the pool was only taken from one state.
It's essentially invalid.
[editline]17th July 2012[/editline]
No it isn't. It was at one point, but it definitely isn't anymore.[/QUOTE]
"it's invalid because i say so. prove you wrong? haha, no thanks."
[QUOTE=Dori;36806685]this is a discussion about TAA being a misogynist[/QUOTE]
Well I don't think he is being a misogynist in particular as that would imply he particularly hates women and only women, while he seems to be more of a misanthropist (aka hate the entire human race).
[QUOTE=Kopimi;36806808]"it's invalid because i say so. prove you wrong? haha, no thanks."[/QUOTE]
It provides absolutely NO proof of its origin, its size, and it's hosted on a cartooning website
It's COMPLETELY invalid.
[QUOTE=Mr. Smartass;36806905]It provides absolutely NO proof of its origin, its size, and it's hosted on a cartooning website
It's COMPLETELY invalid.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.legalmomentum.org/our-work/njep/njep-task-forces.html[/url]
cites the Massachusetts study i posted in addition to more information that irrefutably suggests that not only were your assertions about anti-male bias in civil courts completely fabricated, there's is evidence that there's an actual anti-female bias in civil courts.
Hey - you think we could end this argument? Please?
[editline]17th July 2012[/editline]
Or at least stop being asses to each other thanks.
[QUOTE=Captain Forever;36802830][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/3WFrF.png[/IMG]
gross[/QUOTE]
Why is this gross? All the bitches want his dick now.
this fat idiot was scum before he sold out anyway
He never was a very intelligent guy. Reminds me of the kinds of people who scour through thesauruses to try and improve their "active" vocabulary online. I'm not sure why he was ever so popular. This whole "athiest" movement of "I'm smarter than you" is just so pitifully stupid. If you ever want to be enraged spend some time on reddits athiesm board.
[QUOTE=The Mighty Boat;36816449]this fat idiot was scum before he sold out anyway[/QUOTE]
I don't think anyone was, or would be able, to argue that he isn't.
[IMG]http://static.quickmeme.com/media/social/qm.gif[/IMG][QUOTE=Strider*;36816599]He never was a very intelligent guy. Reminds me of the kinds of people who scour through thesauruses to try and improve their "active" vocabulary online. I'm not sure why he was ever so popular. This whole "athiest" movement of "I'm smarter than you" is just so pitifully stupid. If you ever want to be enraged spend some time on reddits athiesm board.[/QUOTE]
Went onto it, I know its a shit hole and it did not disappoint, all shit on the front page.
George Carlin quote on a picture, Check.
A meme making fun of Christians, usually attacking the religion as a whole as if every Christian was like this. Check
Making fun of someone on Twitter/Facebook. Check
A picture of some fat neckbeard/Hipster at some random ass rally holding a sign with an incredibly witty saying. Check
[IMG]http://static.quickmeme.com/media/social/qm.gif[/IMG]
[IMG]http://static.quickmeme.com/media/social/qm.gif[/IMG]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
