• gta v on intel hd graphics 4000
    59 replies, posted
This would probably set my laptop on fire despite the fact it can run it.
[QUOTE=ShaunOfTheLive;47563633]This is great; it'll definitely run fine for me because I have a GTX 750. Oh wait, fuck, no, it'll still grind to a halt because of my Core2Duo E4500.[/QUOTE] How do you have 750 and C2D together?
[QUOTE=Terminutter;47562775]Does this mean I could run it on my 650m? I was kinda curious but had actually discounted the thought of it. My processor and RAM I know to be up to the task, but didn't think my GPU would do it. Course my laptop will probably end up as a space heater, but I can live with that.[/QUOTE] a 650 plays this game fine at most things high (texture detail is normal)
[QUOTE=ashrobhoy;47564607]a 650 plays this game fine at most things high (texture detail is normal)[/QUOTE] A 650m isn't a 650, though, the 650m is about as powerful as a GTS 450
[QUOTE=Rixxz2;47564734]A 650m isn't a 650, though, the 650m is about as powerful as a GTS 450[/QUOTE] For what its worth, my 745m plays GTA V extremely well. Albeit, at 768p, but mostly everything normal/high and hovers around 40-60 fps. Glad they fixed the switchable graphics in the last update though. At least, for Nvidia GPUs. [editline]20th April 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=Grenadiac;47562586]My notebook for some reason has a true blue quadcore 3.2 ghz i7 and a decent dedicated AMD graphics card. It owns when games recognize the card. The problem is its stupid bullshit switchable graphics which I can't turn off. There is literally no way to make it only use the dedicated card, so games that don't support switchable graphics, like GTA 5, will not use it.[/QUOTE] Usually how switchable graphics work nowadays, the dedicated GPU sends the video to the integrated graphic's framebuffer so it can be displayed. Unfortunately, this means you can't disable the integrated graphics, because the integrated graphics is the only thing that can communicate with your display. I assume AMD GPUs don't do it a whole lot differently from Nvidia GPUs. You need to be sure that gtav.exe and gtavlauncher.exe are added and set to use the dedicated GPU. Although last I heard, AMD switchable graphics were having a lot of issues with GTA V so it might be a bug.
[QUOTE=itisjuly;47564314]How do you have 750 and C2D together?[/QUOTE] My 8800 GTS 512 that was about 7 years old finally fried and I was forced to buy a new GPU. EDIT: if you actually mean "how" instead of "why", then believe it or not, socket 775 boards have PCI Express
Here's how it looks like on 800x600 [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3e-BqGlytWA[/media] I believe it's impossible to make this game actually look bad.
[QUOTE=ShaunOfTheLive;47565007]My 8800 GTS 512 that was about 7 years old finally fried and I was forced to buy a new GPU. EDIT: if you actually mean "how" instead of "why", then believe it or not, socket 775 boards have PCI Express[/QUOTE] same shit happened to me. 8800 gts 512 shat the bed now I hace a C2D E6600 and a gtx 460 so while my gfx might make it my cpu makes games stutter like heck on high fps(Rome 2)
And here's IV on the same GPU [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pT3LMEOmww[/media] :v:
runs worse?
[QUOTE=Killuah;47565302]runs worse?[/QUOTE] 10 fps on lowest settings.
[QUOTE=Digimutant;47561832]Hardly anything like GTA IV on Max.[/QUOTE] You're forgetting how shitty GTA4 looked. It was practically on fullbright except for shadows, which just made it look like a slightly darker fullbright.
I've come to the conclusion that GTA 5 is magic. The last three years, Rockstar must have been sacrificing goats for this technical marvel.
I'm sorry, but I don't know jack shit about hardware. Can I run this? Specs for my shit-machine: [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/nUQOXeS.png[/IMG]
I was so surprised when my friend could run this on his 2013 macbook with intel hd 4000 i5 at a solid 30 frames. He keeps putting off buying a gaming pc too and we were hoping this would finally get him to buy one. Fuck you rockstar
[QUOTE=X12321;47567108]I was so surprised when my friend could run this on his 2013 macbook with intel hd 4000 i5 at a solid 30 frames. He keeps putting off buying a gaming pc too and we were hoping this would finally get him to buy one. Fuck you rockstar[/QUOTE] So, in short if I ran this game on my rMBP would I get more than 30 on 1280x800?
Gotta say, after the disaster that was GTA IV's PC launch, Rockstar really pulled out the technical stops for V. If only all PC games were this well optimised.
[QUOTE=A Sock Accnt;47566330]I'm sorry, but I don't know jack shit about hardware. Can I run this? Specs for my shit-machine: [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/nUQOXeS.png[/IMG][/QUOTE] The iGPU of the i3 2350 is a much slower Intel HD 3000, so no
I got: GTX 650TI OC 2gb 4gb RAM 6core Amd @ 3.6 what kind of performance can i expect from that?
[QUOTE=poundead;47569602]I got: GTX 650TI OC 2gb 4gb RAM 6core Amd @ 3.6 what kind of performance can i expect from that?[/QUOTE] Around 10-15 fps. Needs more ram and upgrade to intel
[QUOTE=poundead;47569602]I got: GTX 650TI OC 2gb 4gb RAM 6core Amd @ 3.6 what kind of performance can i expect from that?[/QUOTE] I have a low power dual core Intel laptop with an 820m, I made some changes to the configuration file to turn shadows off completely, but I never dip below 30fps. So you should definitely be able to run it. I would imagine at 60fps with the right settings.
[QUOTE=poundead;47569602]I got: GTX 650TI OC 2gb 4gb RAM 6core Amd @ 3.6 what kind of performance can i expect from that?[/QUOTE] With everything set to "Normal" with no AA @ 1920x1080 you'll get at least 30FPS, so basically the PS4/XB1 experience. [editline]21st April 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=itisjuly;47569667]Around 10-15 fps. Needs more ram and upgrade to intel[/QUOTE] GTA V is one of the few games that can actually utilize more than four cores properly, so if people with low-end i3's can play it, I don't see why a six core FX or Phenom II wouldn't be able to do the same. But yeah getting another 4GB of PM would be wise
[QUOTE=Rixxz2;47570153]With everything set to "Normal" with no AA @ 1920x1080 you'll get at least 30FPS, so basically the PS4/XB1 experience. [editline]21st April 2015[/editline] GTA V is one of the few games that can actually utilize more than four cores properly, so if people with low-end i3's can play it, I don't see why a six core FX or Phenom II wouldn't be able to do the same. But yeah getting another 4GB of PM would be wise[/QUOTE] PS4/X1 experience may be 30 fps, but graphically everything on normal is sub-ps3/360.
According to Digital Foundry these are the PC settings that match the PS4 version [QUOTE]Console settings on a budget PC - can it work? The patched PS4 release goes head-to-head with our Core i3 4130 paired with a GTX 750 Ti. [b]All settings are equal to the PS4's, at 1080p with FXAA, with 4x anisotropic filtering, very high textures and grass, high shadows, and ultra post-processing.[/b][/QUOTE] Comparison video [video=youtube;9OE2iI7OLh8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OE2iI7OLh8[/video]
[QUOTE=Dalto11;47570836]but graphically everything on normal is sub-ps3/360.[/QUOTE] I have a hard time believing that
I wish to atleast start out playing GTAV from 45 to 50 FPS with great lighting and dense foilage and traffic, but I doubt I'll succeed with: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit Intel Core i3 4160 @ 3.60GHz 4,00GB Single-Channel DDR3 @ 799MHz 2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 (MSI) 230V power supply I have enough room in my tower for a GTX 750 Ti and I could get another 4GB RAM chip, but I'm told that the electricity circut won't be able to handle it. Someone care to explain?
[QUOTE=Rixxz2;47571209]I have a hard time believing that[/QUOTE] Its actually pretty mixed. Setting the game on absolutely lowest settings can look worse than the PS3/360 but looks better in other ways. Especially when textures are concerned. It looks like some textures on the PS3/360 version are on high, but others are on normal. And some assets are entirely different, like trees and foliage. They definitely have the PS3/360 version tweaked to their specific limitations. [video=youtube;La9vzurVTlQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=La9vzurVTlQ[/video] However, that isn't necessarily a bad thing, since that means the game will scale to older/underpowered hardware fairly well.
[QUOTE=SilverDragon619;47571224]I wish to atleast start out playing GTAV from 45 to 50 FPS with great lighting and dense foilage and traffic, but I doubt I'll succeed with: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit Intel Core i3 4160 @ 3.60GHz 4,00GB Single-Channel DDR3 @ 799MHz 2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 (MSI) 230V power supply I have enough room in my tower for a GTX 750 Ti and I could get another 4GB RAM chip, but I'm told that the electricity circut won't be able to handle it. Someone care to explain?[/QUOTE] They're talking about the power supply, you'll need to open the computer and look at it's maximum energy output, it's input voltage (230) means nothing [IMG]http://www.pcper.com/images/reviews/206/PSU-1.jpg[/IMG] [editline]21st April 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=Demache;47571297]Its actually pretty mixed. Setting the game on absolutely lowest settings can look worse than the PS3/360 but looks better in other ways. Especially when textures are concerned. It looks like some textures on the PS3/360 version are on high, but others are on normal. And some assets are entirely different, like trees and foliage. They definitely have the PS3/360 version tweaked to their specific limitations. [/QUOTE] Ah, that makes sense
Holy shit. The only reason I was holding back on buying it was because I wrongly assumed it would perform like IV, but now I have now hangups about buying it.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.