[QUOTE=shadowboy303;51577646]When you hit the limit they just go back to 10.
That was apart of the old DRM. Does not really apply anymore.
EG: I've reinstalled my A10C at least 14 times now.[/QUOTE]
Do you know if I can get my FC/2 and Blackshark shit back? I bought everything on lockon.ru
[QUOTE=edberg;51589692]Do you know if I can get my FC/2 and Blackshark shit back? I bought everything on lockon.ru[/QUOTE]
Contact ED, they are have surprisingly good customer service.
Review of the module:
[video]https://youtu.be/DpFIHZJbTtY[/video]
If they ever do the Su-47 I will buy it in a heartbeat
Swedish pride.
[QUOTE=SpartanXC9;51743387]If they ever do the Su-47 I will buy it in a heartbeat[/QUOTE]
i doubt they're going to get documentation on a classified tech demonstrator aircraft
older fulcrums or flankers could potentially happen though
[QUOTE=SpartanXC9;51743387]If they ever do the Su-47 I will buy it in a heartbeat[/QUOTE]
It was a tech demonstrator and not a real fighter. Making a DCS Su-47 would be as ridiculous as making a DCS X-29. It'd be interesting sure, but it would never happen.
[t]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/10/X-29_at_High_Angle_of_Attack_with_Smoke_Generators.jpg/1280px-X-29_at_High_Angle_of_Attack_with_Smoke_Generators.jpg[/t]
[QUOTE=Zezibesh;51743476]i doubt they're going to get documentation on a classified tech demonstrator aircraft
older fulcrums or flankers could potentially happen though[/QUOTE]
All i wish for is a mig 31 :[
[QUOTE=BandClassHAH;51574303]Another 60$ full-fi addon that would require atleast like, 200$+ in gear just to play effectively. I love DCS world, I really do, but holy fuck they're price gouging ordinary enthusiasts hard. It's almost like the Flight Sim X payware community.[/QUOTE]
The thing with the Flight Sim payware like this is they're full on sims. As real as possible, to the last detail, and are meant for people who are going to put hundreds of hours into it. They spend months or years developing it and get input from actual pilots of the aircraft to boot. On top of that it's already a hyper niche market as it is. So payware of this caliber is usually pretty pricey
You can also buy a cheap X-45 and be good to go. With the X-45 you can fly the A-10C from take off, through a mission, and to landing, without ever taking your hands off the stick or throttle (Why it's called a HOTAS)
I can't wait for the F-18 and the Carrier ops. And seeing people fail consistently to land on the carrier on the 104th server
I'm looking forward to the F14, now that leatherneck is almost finished with the Viggen they can finally dedicate most of their resources to it.
I'll probably practice my non-existent carrier skills on the F-18 first though.
[QUOTE=Zezibesh;51743476]i doubt they're going to get documentation on a classified tech demonstrator aircraft
older fulcrums or flankers could potentially happen though[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Why485;51743946]It was a tech demonstrator and not a real fighter. Making a DCS Su-47 would be as ridiculous as making a DCS X-29. It'd be interesting sure, but it would never happen.
[t]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/10/X-29_at_High_Angle_of_Attack_with_Smoke_Generators.jpg/1280px-X-29_at_High_Angle_of_Attack_with_Smoke_Generators.jpg[/t][/QUOTE]
I just want to fly an inverted-wing aircraft in a super detailed simulator :(
[QUOTE=Saxon;51744938]I'm looking forward to the F14, now that leatherneck is almost finished with the Viggen they can finally dedicate most of their resources to it.
I'll probably practice my non-existent carrier skills on the F-18 first though.[/QUOTE]
the f-18 will be a better module (and aircraft) anyway
[QUOTE=TheTalon;51744826]The thing with the Flight Sim payware like this is they're full on sims. As real as possible, to the last detail, and are meant for people who are going to put hundreds of hours into it. They spend months or years developing it and get input from actual pilots of the aircraft to boot. On top of that it's already a hyper niche market as it is. So payware of this caliber is usually pretty pricey
You can also buy a cheap X-45 and be good to go. With the X-45 you can fly the A-10C from take off, through a mission, and to landing, without ever taking your hands off the stick or throttle (Why it's called a HOTAS)
I can't wait for the F-18 and the Carrier ops. And seeing people fail consistently to land on the carrier on the 104th server[/QUOTE]
I've got the A-10C, UH-1H, that Russian heli with the two rotors (forget its name), and Flaming Cliffs 3. Plus a Saitek x52. I'm not bitchin just for me :(
[QUOTE=abcpea;51747960]the f-18 will be a better module (and aircraft) anyway[/QUOTE]
Both of them will be good and each of them will be a different experience
It will be fun cooping in F-14 if leatherneck fulfills its promise
[QUOTE=BandClassHAH;51747972]I've got the A-10C, UH-1H, that Russian heli with the two rotors (forget its name), and Flaming Cliffs 3. Plus a Saitek x52. I'm not bitchin just for me :([/QUOTE]
Ka-57
ka-50 black shark
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.