Transilience - The video of a 6 foot 6, 350 Pound, Non Passing, Queer ,Feminist, economically challe - General

[QUOTE=mobrockers;41619568]Because I can't be bothered listening to her.[/QUOTE] then why the shit are you posting about what's on her wrist in a thread about transgenderism if you aren't bothered to care

[QUOTE=Ownederd;41619607]then why the shit are you posting about what's on her wrist in a thread about transgenderism if you aren't bothered to care[/QUOTE] Her voice is annoying and she wears two watches. God do you even pay attention?

[QUOTE=mobrockers;41619617]Her voice is annoying and she wears two watches. God do you even pay attention?[/QUOTE] no one cares about what you think. the only thing you're doing is detracting from the thread and being weird + rude. please don't

[QUOTE=Ownederd;41619542]why are you even talking about what's on her wrist? why does it even bother you lol do you even know what 'sheltered' means. acceptance of gender minorities is not common in the slightest[/QUOTE] TWP here isn't exactly the smartest grape in the [url=http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1293808&p=41619488&viewfull=1#post41619488]bunch.[/url] [editline]28th July 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=mobrockers;41619584]Pretty weird bracelet then. Makes more sense as a watch seeing as it's a round thing with straps on both sides.[/QUOTE] It's probably an emblem or a picture holder of some sort.

[QUOTE=Ownederd;41619632]no one cares about what you think. the only thing you're doing is detracting from the thread and being weird + rude. please don't[/QUOTE] Clearly you care. Don't need to make such a big deal out of it, I was just commenting on her two weird watches. What's your problem. It's not like these threads ever go anywhere, might as well talk about what she was thinking wearing those two weird watches. [editline]28th July 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=FlubberNugget;41619644]TWP here isn't exactly the smartest grape in the [url=http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1293808&p=41619488&viewfull=1#post41619488]bunch.[/url] [editline]28th July 2013[/editline] It's probably an emblem or a picture holder of some sort.[/QUOTE] If it were a necklace, sure. Still doesn't make much sense as a bracelet.

[QUOTE=mobrockers;41619660]Clearly you care. Don't need to make such a big deal out of it, I was just commenting on her two weird watches. What's your problem. It's not like these threads ever go anywhere, might as well talk about what she was thinking wearing those two weird watches.[/QUOTE] the most you can get out of a thread about someone explaining themselves (along with other several important issues) is nitpicking about what they wear? please tell me that the fact that this just odd shouldn't escape you

Everyone seems to be forgetting how fat it is. If you're over 24% bodyfat something is wrong with you.

[QUOTE=Moo;41619910]Everyone seems to be forgetting how fat it is. If you're over 24% bodyfat something is wrong with you.[/QUOTE] Usually they call it being overweight.

[QUOTE=FlubberNugget;41619933]Usually they call it being overweight.[/QUOTE] Or just fucking lazy

[QUOTE=Moo;41619910]Everyone seems to be forgetting how fat it is. If you're over 24% bodyfat something is wrong with you.[/QUOTE] who the hell calls someone "it". last time i checked, it's she, not an object. and you've blessed us with this: "fat things just deserve to die" do you legitimately have social issues or something dude

[QUOTE=Ownederd;41619981]who the hell calls someone "it". last time i checked, it's she, not an object. and you've blessed us with this: "fat things just deserve to die" do you legitimately have social issues or something dude[/QUOTE] Ahh, watch out. A gang of people with 0-3 posts might rate you dumb!

[QUOTE=Ownederd;41619981]who the hell calls someone "it". last time i checked, it's she, not an object. and you've blessed us with this: "fat things just deserve to die" do you legitimately have social issues or something dude[/QUOTE] Simply ask yourself: 1.) Has a fat person ever contributed any significant advances to human knowledge or power? (No) 2.) Does a fat person consume more resources than the average person? (Yes) 3.) Does the excessive use of resources justify any potential fat people have? (No) Therefore we can conclude they have no right to exist. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Trolling" - verynicelady))[/highlight]

[QUOTE=Moo;41620036]Simply ask yourself: 1.) Has a fat person ever contributed any significant advances to human knowledge or power? (No) 2.) Does a fat person consume more resources than the average person? (Yes) 3.) Does the excessive use of resources justify any potential fat people have? (No) Therefore we can conclude they have no right to exist.[/QUOTE] Simply ask yourself: 1.) Are you really making such an uninformed point? 2.) No. 3.) No, but often they can't help it. Losing weight is a lot harder than you would imagine. We should probably kill you off, you don't seem to contribute much to society. Surely you would agree?

[QUOTE=Moo;41620036]Simply ask yourself: 1.) Has a fat person ever contributed any significant advances to human knowledge or power? (No) 2.) Does a fat person consume more resources than the average person? (Yes) 3.) Does the excessive use of resources justify any potential fat people have? (No) Therefore we can conclude they have no right to exist.[/QUOTE] i'm curious to know if you have autism or something, and not in a insulting way. people i've met who have this mindset overthink the shit out of things and act like bitter nerds

Spouting hateful crap like 'Fat people have no right to exist' is basically saying you don't think human rights should exist. I have come to the conclusion that Moo here either has some kind of social disorder or is simply shitposting.

[QUOTE=Moo;41620036]1.) Has a fat person ever contributed any significant advances to human knowledge or power? (No)[/QUOTE] I think fat people should diet and slim down, but even I think this post is autistic.

[QUOTE=FlubberNugget;41620042]Simply ask yourself: 1.) Are you really making such an uninformed point? 2.) No. 3.) No, but often they can't help it. Losing weight is a lot harder than you would imagine. We should probably kill you off, you don't seem to contribute much to society. Surely you would agree?[/QUOTE] ignorance prevents comprehension, and causes you to understand things contrary to reality resource allocation is commonly distributed based on value, and fat people have less value in all instances, there is no justification for any amount of resources they consume. I guess my argument is simply too BASED IN REASON for you to actually refute, so you rely on insults.

Thanks for your BASED IN REASON post, but it's actually the exact opposite. I'm not even gonna bother explaining why because you seem to value a few resources over human life. You should stop with the pseudo intelligent shit.

[QUOTE=Moo;41620124]ignorance prevents comprehension, and causes you to understand things contrary to reality resource allocation is commonly distributed based on value, and fat people have less value in all instances, there is no justification for any amount of resources they consume. I guess my argument is simply too BASED IN REASON for you to actually refute, so you rely on insults.[/QUOTE] oh my god you're adorable good luck writing your social darwinism essay that all of 3 people will read on amazon. godspeed my proud internet warrior :)

[QUOTE=Moo;41620036]Simply ask yourself: [B] 1.) Has a fat person ever contributed any significant advances to human knowledge or power? (No)[/B] 2.) Does a fat person consume more resources than the average person? (Yes) 3.) Does the excessive use of resources justify any potential fat people have? (No) Therefore we can conclude they have no right to exist.[/QUOTE] ????????????????

[QUOTE=Moo;41620124]resource allocation is commonly distributed based on value, and fat people have less value in all instances, there is no justification for any amount of resources they consume.[/QUOTE] Oh boy, I get to bring out my economics knowledge! Why do fat people have less value? Do you know how much they produce? Do you think that they simply just spend more products of their labour on food as opposed to other various goods? It's not like we have a food crisis, and fat people usually pay more for bigger meals and extra/bigger seats anyways. Also although they consume more energy in say, clothing or cars, it's their cost anyways, so why should you care?

[QUOTE=Moo;41620036]Therefore we can conclude they have no right to exist.[/QUOTE] I agree. Anyone unfit to serve the populace should be eradicated. Jews too!

[QUOTE=Emperorconor;41620154]Oh boy, I get to bring out my economics knowledge! Why do fat people have less value? Do you know how much they produce? Do you think that they simply just spend more products of their labour on food as opposed to other various goods? It's not like we have a food crisis, and fat people usually pay more for bigger meals and extra/bigger seats anyways. Also although they consume more energy in say, clothing or cars, it's their cost anyways, so why should you care?[/QUOTE] I=Intrinsic Value R=Resources consumed V=Final Value [n] = normal [f] = fat Normal People: I-R[n]=V Fat People: 0-R[f]=V Fat People have an I that ALWAYS equals zero and fat people ALWAYS consume more than a normal person (therefore R[f] is always greater than R[n]). R[f] > R[n] Therefore, since R[f] is always greater than R[n], even a normal person with zero intrinsic value will have more final value (V) than a fat person. a fat person will ALWAYS have less value than even a USELESS normal person. Homeowners and the lower classes bore the purification of capitalism on behalf of the system as a whole. And not one fat person is a homeowner

[QUOTE=DTkach;41619195]Being unique and having preferences and opinions and differences is being human. When you create labels for everything you do, you are seeking attention. When you use these labels to discriminate and put down others, you are a douchebag.[/QUOTE] have you ever thought that maybe just maybe people find comfort in things they can identify with, such as labels? gee oh man thats such a shocking fucking revelation. [QUOTE=mobrockers;41619660]Clearly you care. Don't need to make such a big deal out of it, I was just commenting on her two weird watches. What's your problem. [B]It's not like these threads ever go anywhere[/B], might as well talk about what she was thinking wearing those two weird watches. [/QUOTE] ususally because of people like you, brockers.

[QUOTE=Moo;41620177]I=Intrinsic Value R=Resources consumed V=Final Value [n] = normal [f] = fat Normal People: I-R[n]=V Fat People: 0-R[f]=V Fat People have an I that ALWAYS equals zero and fat people ALWAYS consume more than a normal person (therefore R[f] is always greater than R[n]). R[f] > R[n] Therefore, since R[f] is always greater than R[n], even a normal person with zero intrinsic value will have more final value (V) than a fat person. a fat person will ALWAYS have less value than even a USELESS normal person. Homeowners and the lower classes bore the purification of capitalism on behalf of the system as a whole. And not one fat person is a homeowner[/QUOTE] ok you have to be joking, because this is the weirdest and most strung-out crap i've read in a fair while poe's law applies here, hard

[QUOTE=Moo;41620177]I=Intrinsic Value R=Resources consumed V=Final Value [n] = normal [f] = fat Normal People: I-R[n]=V Fat People: 0-R[f]=V Fat People have an I that ALWAYS equals zero and fat people ALWAYS consume more than a normal person (therefore R[f] is always greater than R[n]). R[f] > R[n] Therefore, since R[f] is always greater than R[n], even a normal person with zero intrinsic value will have more final value (V) than a fat person. a fat person will ALWAYS have less value than even a USELESS normal person. Homeowners and the lower classes bore the purification of capitalism on behalf of the system as a whole. And not one fat person is a homeowner[/QUOTE] ...Wow. I didn't think someone could be so self righteous in a single post. Mind citing your sources for some of these factual reasons for fat people being a degenerate part of society? :^)

[QUOTE=Moo;41620177]I=Intrinsic Value[/quote] This doesn't exist. It's commonly accepted that value is a social construct. [quote]a fat person will ALWAYS have less value than even a USELESS normal person.[/quote] Where does this logic come from? If a fat bastard is making 100$ worth of items a day, and a thin bastard isn't, does this not imply the fat bastard is contributing to society? [quote]Homeowners and the lower classes bore the purification of capitalism on behalf of the system as a whole. And not one fat person is a homeowner[/QUOTE] wot [quote]And not one fat person is a homeowner[/quote] u wot

[QUOTE=Moo;41620036]Simply ask yourself: 1.) Has a fat person ever contributed any significant advances to human knowledge or power? (No) 2.) Does a fat person consume more resources than the average person? (Yes) 3.) Does the excessive use of resources justify any potential fat people have? (No) Therefore we can conclude they have no right to exist.[/QUOTE] The fuck is with this post? Fat people have no right to exist? That's just some straight up Nazi shit to be honest.

Looking at Moo's ban history, I think ignoring him is the best solution. [editline]28th July 2013[/editline] But oh no, he might get on all of his alts and rate me dumb!!! I might actually cry, the box is depressing me for reals ;( [highlight](User was banned for this post ("This post is not about the thread topic" - verynicelady))[/highlight]

[QUOTE=Skelmech;41620180]have you ever thought that maybe just maybe people find comfort in things they can identify with, such as labels? gee oh man thats such a shocking fucking revelation. ususally because of people like you, brockers.[/QUOTE] Perhaps.