• All-female band tries to sing while having orgasms
    48 replies, posted
[QUOTE=voltlight;44784302]I'm a fucktard.[/QUOTE] Go away.
[QUOTE=voltlight;44784302]bunch of whores[/QUOTE] C'mon man.
i find it entertaining that the lady with the white hair and the redhead are trying their best to fight through it and the lady in blue is just like "eh fuck it i'll enjoy it" they all have nice voices but this song is just not in the right key. like at all.
[QUOTE=Doritos-pope;44784018]On the hysterical literature website they mention feminism as one of the themes behind it. Like for gods sake your making a girl sit on a vibrating plastic cock what the hell does that have to do with feminism?[/QUOTE] The fuck, it feels like a huge step back from feminism "no one knows who we are, so let's get popular with sex"
[QUOTE=Socram;44782113]Probably because its a desperate and gimmicky way for an untalented sounding band to get views. Just because sex sells doesn't mean it should.[/QUOTE] Let them do what they want. If there is a market for this type of stuff, then that is just the result of natural desire. If sex sells, then fuck it, sex sells. Whether or not it 'should' be sold is not for you to judge.
[QUOTE=Arctic Snow;44786619]Let them do what they want. If there is a market for this type of stuff, then that is just the result of natural desire. If sex sells, then fuck it, sex sells. Whether or not it 'should' be sold is not for you to judge.[/QUOTE] Yeah, we can judge. Why should we shut up, just for the sake of "they can do what they want?" We're allowed to criticize, and we are.
[QUOTE=LegndNikko;44786623]Yeah, we can judge. Why should we shut up, just for the sake of "they can do what they want?" We're allowed to criticize, and we are.[/QUOTE] Because I find it to be confusing on your part if you judge, as you should not have a natural inclination to judge something you dislike, more so that you should dismiss it. If you do not find something that is within the confines of your interest why spend time criticizing it? You are only wasting time by indulging in the thing that you find unacceptable. Which contradicts your position regarding the issue.
Sybians
[QUOTE=Arctic Snow;44786679]you should not have a natural inclination to judge something you dislike, more so that you should dismiss it. [/QUOTE] er no. Maybe in an ideal world. People will always be criticising things purely on the grounds that it's not in their taste - call it human nature.
They'd rather get off then finish the song. They are so selfish.
[QUOTE=Cabbage;44787679]er no. Maybe in an ideal world. People will always be criticising things purely on the grounds that it's not in their taste - call it human nature.[/QUOTE] Only if you believe that evolution cannot alter our tendencies will you be the product of a static or slow developing species. Criticism, as any other trait, is rooted within the foundations of our behavior. If one were to recognize that, and evolve oneself from their biological nature, then perhaps we may all dwell in a utopia. But be my guest, say 'er no' and continue your existence within the confines of accepting distrust and intolerance as your true reality and perception of 'human nature'.
[QUOTE=Arctic Snow;44786679]Because I find it to be confusing on your part if you judge, as you should not have a natural inclination to judge something you dislike, more so that you should dismiss it. If you do not find something that is within the confines of your interest why spend time criticizing it? You are only wasting time by indulging in the thing that you find unacceptable. Which contradicts your position regarding the issue.[/QUOTE] That makes absolutely no sense. The whole point of criticism is forward society in a way which is deemed morally right or logical. Of course what is morally right is all a matter of opinion but that doesn't lessen the need for it. If they're true artists then they would want the criticism as it allows them to grow as artists. If we don't criticize then shit ideas would be more frequent and nobody would ever adapt or change.
[QUOTE=omarfr;44788529]That makes absolutely no sense. The whole point of criticism is forward society in a way which is deemed morally right or logical. Of course what is morally right is all a matter of opinion but that doesn't lessen the need for it. If they're true artists then they would want the criticism as it allows them to grow as artists. If we don't criticize then shit ideas would be more frequent and nobody would ever adapt or change.[/QUOTE] First let me say that I am approaching this issue to tackle the criticism of art or the expression of our creativity, not any political or legislative aspect. I think that we should first come to an agreement on what it means to criticize. I was basing my definition of criticism on this original comment. [QUOTE]"Probably because its a desperate and gimmicky way for an untalented sounding band to get views. Just because sex sells doesn't mean it should."[/QUOTE] This poster assumes that scandalous, improper or exaggerated behavior is an incorrect way to create art. Even when there is demand for this type of art by the populace. He calls for a limitation of people's behavior because it is deems as incorrect, when as you said it what is morally appropriate is subjective. You are referring to criticism as a method of evaluation or reflection I presume? and therefore we are arguing different aspects. I am saying that criticism as a method of denying the expression of others not only prevents evolution, but it contradicts the commenters position as they rather say shit about it (thereby indulging in the art that they hate so much). Why not dismiss it completely if it truly bothers you? That's because people want to impose their beliefs on others because they believe they have a greater sense of 'right' when there is no absolute sense of right. [QUOTE]"If they're true artists then they would want the criticism as it allows them to grow as artists"[/QUOTE] I'm not talking about the artists, I'm talking about the people who claim to despise the art, yet still indulge in it. [QUOTE]"If we don't criticize then shit ideas would be more frequent and nobody would ever adapt or change."[/QUOTE] That is not entirely true. Look at this thread, look at the type of replies that have been written. A high majority of every post finds this piece of art to be not of their tastes. Even if they did not post in this thread they would still hold those beliefs. There is always a natural process of a negative feedback system eg. Negative feedback is an effect (dislike of orgasm music song) caused by a system (people's reaction to orgasm music song) which stabilizes or brings a factor to norm (this art is a piece of shit, art like this should not be created = less art like this is created as there is less demand) Therefore society will adapt and change because they will determine what they like and what they don't like. Therefore 'shit' (what do you even mean by shit) ideas will decrease.
i cant believe how much better porn stars are at acting out orgasms its a world of difference
Are girls unable to control their vocal chords while getting sexually aroused? I thought they moaned voluntarily.
[QUOTE=Arctic Snow;44788713]First let me say that I am approaching this issue to tackle the criticism of art or the expression of our creativity, not any political or legislative aspect. I think that we should first come to an agreement on what it means to criticize. I was basing my definition of criticism on this original comment. This poster assumes that scandalous, improper or exaggerated behavior is an incorrect way to create art. Even when there is demand for this type of art by the populace. He calls for a limitation of people's behavior because it is deems as incorrect, when as you said it what is morally appropriate is subjective. You are referring to criticism as a method of evaluation or reflection I presume? and therefore we are arguing different aspects. I am saying that criticism as a method of denying the expression of others not only prevents evolution, but it contradicts the commenters position as they rather say shit about it (thereby indulging in the art that they hate so much). Why not dismiss it completely if it truly bothers you? That's because people want to impose their beliefs on others because they believe they have a greater sense of 'right' when there is no absolute sense of right. I'm not talking about the artists, I'm talking about the people who claim to despise the art, yet still indulge in it. That is not entirely true. Look at this thread, look at the type of replies that have been written. A high majority of every post finds this piece of art to be not of their tastes. Even if they did not post in this thread they would still hold those beliefs. There is always a natural process of a negative feedback system eg. Negative feedback is an effect (dislike of orgasm music song) caused by a system (people's reaction to orgasm music song) which stabilizes or brings a factor to norm (this art is a piece of shit, art like this should not be created = less art like this is created as there is less demand) Therefore society will adapt and change because they will determine what they like and what they don't like. Therefore 'shit' (what do you even mean by shit) ideas will decrease.[/QUOTE] Fair game I see your point. Unfortunately there will always be haters.
[QUOTE=NO ONE;44780910]So were they [b]jerking it[/b] or getting ate out? I'm really curious. They made it hard to tell.[/QUOTE] Been watching too much creepy Japanese porn, boy?
[QUOTE=Arctic Snow;44788379]Only if you believe that evolution cannot alter our tendencies will you be the product of a static or slow developing species. Criticism, as any other trait, is rooted within the foundations of our behavior. If one were to recognize that, and evolve oneself from their biological nature, then perhaps we may all dwell in a utopia. But be my guest, say 'er no' and continue your existence within the confines of accepting distrust and intolerance as your true reality and perception of 'human nature'.[/QUOTE] That took a few reads, but I think you're actually agreeing with me there.
[QUOTE=Cabbage;44797975]That took a few reads, but I think you're actually agreeing with me there.[/QUOTE] I agree that within our biological tendencies we criticize. However I am calling for the evolution of the human species, to figure out what our flaws are and to adapt.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.