Ajit Pai tries to convince people that everything will be okay after the repeal - General

From what I see, and from what I know, which is likely not a lot, it does seem to be some sort of Bomb Threat that caused this ruckus. Hm. It's the most likely explanation due to the dogs sniffing about.

Aaaaand everybody's back and the scumbag returns to shitting out lies and deception.

Back at it again with the high volume bitcoin mining

[QUOTE=redBadger;52976097][media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xG3lObJuaQ[/media][/QUOTE] Speaking of which: [t]https://68.media.tumblr.com/e4aa1d2abb951e545356ddf8c6303462/tumblr_p0rguklmm41wwgdrlo1_1280.png[/t]

75% of your voters are "trolls". lol ok.

[QUOTE=Katatonic717;52974946]He needs to eat an infinite amount of dicks. That might not even be enough to be honest. Probably couldn't cram any more in tho, not with all those corporate shlongs guzzled down his throat.[/QUOTE] Idk about that, his mouth seems pretty wide.

[QUOTE=Skerion;52976754]Speaking of which: [t]https://68.media.tumblr.com/e4aa1d2abb951e545356ddf8c6303462/tumblr_p0rguklmm41wwgdrlo1_1280.png[/t][/QUOTE] Ironic, out of all of the TV show characters I could think of, Ron Swanson would be the one against Net Neutrality.

Not even Mega64 could predict how bad Ajit Pai would fail trying to be hip [media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQkfbI3UWGs[/media]

[QUOTE=SILBERDRACHEN;52976152]One thing I want Trump to tell this asshole: YOU ARE [B][I][U]FIRED!!![/U][/I][/B][/QUOTE] But wasn't Trump the one who appointed Ajit Pai as FCC chairman?

[QUOTE=EmilyVasquez;52977214]But wasn't Trump the one who appointed Ajit Pai as FCC chairman?[/QUOTE] Would be the first time he corrects a mistake but he doesn't seem to be the kind to do so. 2017 is still pumping out surprises. Never ending ride, isn't?

[QUOTE=Tudd;52976959]Ironic, out of all of the TV show characters I could think of, Ron Swanson would be the one against Net Neutrality.[/QUOTE] On what basis? Net neutrality is a libertarian concept even if it includes government because it aims at preserving the very quality libertarian values have a priority on

[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;52977425]On what basis? Net neutrality is a libertarian concept even if it includes government because it aims at preserving the very quality libertarian values have a priority on[/QUOTE] The character on the show literally says in one episode that he doesn't believe in government. In another he says hs ideal government is a single guy sitting in an office choosing who to nuke. And he probably doesn't give two shits whether or not the internet is destroyed, because he threw away his computer after someone told him how internet cookies work.

If you actually think Ron Swanson would support Net Neutrality, you seriously don't understand his character at all. [editline]14th December 2017[/editline] [QUOTE=HumanAbyss;52977425]On what basis? Net neutrality is a libertarian concept even if it includes government because it aims at preserving the very quality libertarian values have a priority on[/QUOTE] This is the same TV Show character that says public parks should be privatized because Chuck E Cheese have an impeccable business model. [media]https://youtu.be/ajByWUXanYw[/media] You would have to be delusional not to see the irony Nick Offerman just demonstrated.

And you would have to be a lunatic to take the most sarcastically written character as a serious one

[QUOTE=Tudd;52977498]If you actually think Ron Swanson would support Net Neutrality, you seriously don't understand his character at all. [editline]14th December 2017[/editline] This is the same TV Show character that says public parks should be privatized because Chuck E Cheese have an impeccable business model. You would have to be delusional not to see the irony Nick Offerman just demonstrated.[/QUOTE] Can I just ask if you support overturning net neutrality real quick because this seems like a silly thing to get worked up about.

[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;52977517]And you would have to be a lunatic to take the most sarcastically written character as a serious one[/QUOTE] You actually thought Ron Swanson would seriously support Net Neutrality? I guess it isn't you being a lunatic when you make statements on a fictional character. :v:

Ajit Pai is someone who'd I'd actually revel in watching them cry. He someone that deserves to lose everything and be given absolutely no sympathy. Is his goal to make us hate him? Maybe so. But that doesn't stop me from wishing that he gets fucked one way or another. Anything to see his goofy donkey smile go away.

[QUOTE=HumanAbyss;52977517]And you would have to be a lunatic to take the most sarcastically written character as a serious one[/QUOTE] But Tudd never said he did? All he said was that Ron Swanson wouldn't support net neutrality like his actor clearly does, and he's right.

[QUOTE=CyclonatorZ;52977614]But Tudd never said he did? All he said was that Ron Swanson wouldn't support net neutrality like his actor clearly does, and he's right.[/QUOTE] You gotta remember that people become erect with rage whenever Tudd posts.

Can y'all stop talking about a fictional character holy shit.

I wonder if those people doing the harlem shake with him hate themselves.

[QUOTE=Tudd;52977539]You actually thought Ron Swanson would seriously support Net Neutrality? I guess it isn't you being a lunatic when you make statements on a fictional character. :v:[/QUOTE] Your point is a character written to be as absurd as possible agrees with a bad idea The fuck is the point of that point? To prove there's imaginary hypocrisy?

[QUOTE=Mud;52976146]27 years weren't a bad run[/QUOTE] So, I just want to play a bit of devil's advocate here. For the record, I absolutely positively do not support the repeal of net neutrality, [I]but[/I] I wanted to point out that this statement is not true. The Web has not had net neutrality since it was first born. Net neutrality itself has been a point of contention for the last 27 years. It wasn't until [I]2015[/I] that actual hard regulations were put in place, with a metric shitload of flip flopping between the two since FCC chairs are president appointed. Different presidents, different chairmen, different rules and regulations proposed. I think this whole thing is in dire need of reform, not repeal. This entire concept is something that absolutely has to be governed by an unbiased, bipartisan entity. The FCC is exactly the opposite. Yes, there are still enough checks and balances within the FCC and with the House and Congress to attempt to influence voting on particular rules and regulations, but just take a glance at the history of net neutrality discussions and voting sessions and you'll see just how fucked up it all is, and how often things have been added and repealed over the last 30 years. I guess what I'm trying to say here is, [I]technically[/I], we haven't REALLY had net neutrality for that long, only the last several years. At least, not in the form where actual punishment and enforcement can take place for violations.

Surprised nobody yet has edited a still at 1:12 to make him look like a newly dubbed Vader in RoTS.

He's right. Everything will be okay after the repeal. Until the ISP's decide they won't. And they will. Where are you going to go for your internet? You'll have to move to get a new ISP. Who will probably do the same damn shit. They know this. They have throttled and blocked before the rules, it was getting worse, it's the entire reason the rules were put into place in the first place, and now they're going again. So whatever free service you use over the internet, or even paid ones, prepare for your ISP to launch similar ones then start fucking with those services so you'll use theirs The internet is too important for 5 fucking people to control to such an extent. It needs to be protected and treated the same way speech is. Everyone has an equal right to it and you can't silence it because you don't like it. It should apply to websites and users

[img]https://i.imgur.com/Wa0A6qu.png[/img] My photoshop

Hahahaha, the video got taken down via copyright claim.

[QUOTE=Cliff2;52979689]Hahahaha, the video got taken down via copyright claim.[/QUOTE] nice [media]https://twitter.com/maddecent/status/941467409013129216[/media] here's a mirror in case anyone missed it [media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NtbJyfTNOo[/media]

[IMG]https://i.imgur.com/T9HtkwM.png[/IMG]

As someone else posted, the girl in the black hair is a huge proponent of Pizzagate FYI.