• The Second Presidential Debate - Sponsored by Tic Tacs™
    1,507 replies, posted
[QUOTE=ScriptKitt3h;51179802]Hillary's starting up the "let's go to war with Russia" train![/QUOTE] No she wasn't
Really pandering for the Sanders supporters tonight. Dunno why he's focusing on the fucking Iraq vote either. Dumb as fuck.
Is her Judgement as bad as her Stamina? These are the important questions, people!
Trump is trying very hard to appeal to Sanders supporters tonight.
They're pressing her on the WikiLeaks emails now
[QUOTE=KillerJaguar;51179748]Did you miss the part where he pressed Hillary on the emails?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=FlandersNed;51179750]Because she's actually answering the questions, bar that one thing about the emails.[/QUOTE]Delayed response but: I'm talking about letting people applaud Hillary and letting her talk over her time limit but when it happens for Trump the crowd is "wasting time" and they interrupt him when he starts to ramble. Their glossing over the questions is annoying, yes, but Hillary's only doing slightly better at staying on topic and I wasn't talking about that.
ICE didn't fucking endorse you, you twit. Government agencies cannot endorse a candidate.
A HA!
I liked Clinton's rebuttal about the religious screening. "We are a nation founded on the freedom of religion"
mentioning wikileaks holy shit
[QUOTE=KillerJaguar;51179821]The moderators even pressed Hillary on the 550% Syrian increase. You're only seeing the bias because Trump doesn't answer questions and has to be pressed to get an answer. Which even then, he still rambles off-topic.[/QUOTE] But I don't [I]give a shit[/I] about the increase in Syrians. These aren't the issues people are clamoring for a response to. If they press her to tell us what her favorite color is, they can say they "pressed her" but if it's not on a topic that actually [I]needs pressing[/I] then what is the point? If you let someone weasel out of real issues and then "press them" on an easy issue, you may as well just drop the pretense of pressing them in the first place and let the propaganda continue.
OH SHIT, WIKILEAKS TIME LADIES AND GENTLEMEN!
Mmm but dat private speech bit.
[QUOTE=ScriptKitt3h;51179838]ICE didn't fucking endorse you, you twit. Government agencies cannot endorse a candidate.[/QUOTE] Hes talking about the union, which I do believe did endorse him
If they are pulling stuff from Wikileaks, please pull out questions about the DNC Scandal too!
[QUOTE=KillerJaguar;51179798]He says it's a shame that Islamphobia is a thing and then says the Syrian refugees will be a trojan horse[/QUOTE] I kind of get what he means. You get a bunch of strangers to come into the country, you don't know anything about them. It's a conflict zone, they could be sympathizers from any one of a bunch of different factions. It's a mixed bag, so maybe we should be more wary of that? Maybe keep a manageable amount coming into the country rather than going Germany on it.
I never saw Lincoln. No spoilers
Steven Spielberg? Uh?
I'm 45 minutes late, what has happened?
These two really are just the worst, huh?
he is pacing a lot
Uh oh, Hillary implying election rigging by Russia.
just answer the fucking question, both of you. christ.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/k1Dd3Pq.jpg[/IMG] ?!!?!?!
picture of russian hacker released by Clinton campaign [IMG]http://s.newsweek.com/sites/www.newsweek.com/files/2015/08/14/putincomputer.jpg[/IMG]
Welp, here she goes blaming it on the Kremlin again- and SHE JUST ACCUSED WIKILEAKS OF COLLUDING WITH RUSSIA. Boom. There it is.
[QUOTE=Fish_poke;51179850]I never saw Lincoln. No spoilers[/QUOTE] [sp]He gets assassinated at the end.[/sp]
Steven Spielberg 2016
She pulled a helluva tangent lmao
Once again the answer has nothing to do with the question. "Is it okay for politicians to be two-faced in their ideals?" "Well let me tell you about Speilberg's movie..."
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.