Hey I'm sorry that happened, I'm probably just biased because I could give less of a shit about what people think of my posts here anymore
That's alright, it's just that not everyone is as indifferent about it as you are, so why not try something out to make the forums a bit of a more welcoming place?
I clearly remember other people complaining and feeling tired from it, even though hypocritically the people complaining about it then proceeded to rate others dumb as well. I am pretty sure that I never gave anyone a bad rating in my entire stay on the forum.
Logarithmically reduce the size of the Dumb rating based on the number of people who have rated the post.
Seeing as the icons underwent a new artistic change, and the forum seems under a lot of transitional stages right this second, I'll bump this thread once more, perhaps for the last time.
To reiterate my point; the icons are (seemingly) randomly placed, and could be grouped together for ease of use, as in the OP
You should update the OP, I was really confused for a minute.
i don't have the post offhand, but garry plans on adding more ratings and he did mention a better way of arranging could be on the list.
Will do
That's reassuring. Is it against the rules to "@" garry so he sees this?
New "Informative" icon is ugly mess.
I just noticed that big woop changed to a champagne bottle. Does that mean that it isn't sarcastic anymore?
I think it's still sarcastic
I like the new designs, especially the bottle
anyway, @garry, apparently you're considering changing the icon layout, perhaps the OP of this thread can be of some use
(also apparently it's okay to @ you)
You sarcastically pop champagne to get the party started.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
