• 🔞 The "Should Facepunch Allow NSFW Material?" discussion arena.
    590 replies, posted
How am I the one who is mad about your opinion when you're the one who brought it up? 🤔 I wouldn't have mentioned your brilliant posts about CS that you make in the R6 thread if you didn't mention them. I added my opinion to the discussion ages ago: My argument even solves all of your issues, as if you look at it in context it wants a profile setting toggle which hides NSFW marked threads.
your background is nsfw
I can't tell if being serious or joking now that this has been such a long running thing.
wtf i didn't sign up for this, i wanted some cuddly wuddly furry cock, not some filthy human penis clogging up my nsfw forum!!!
Anime girl with grody lizard tongue with blood in her mouth, username implies she's eating it, no sir I don't like it
hezzy quick have it where we get paid
Now I wish I was again.
Just so nobody gets any funny ideas in the future, that particular background image is on the hitlist when tools support its removal.
At least until Garry makes it his background anyway
Sorry to derail the argument, but for those who want to hide the NSFW subforum entirely (particularly on mobile because I've personally also mis-tapped subforums/threads from their hyperlink's size): here's a way to do so. #wrapper #content .forumcategoryblock .forumpanel:nth-child(11) { display: none; } You can drop this in your CSS if you don't have your own custom one: @import url("https://witheredgryphon.github.io/css/NSFWHider/NSFWHider.css");
Underboob is BANNED
While we are on the subject of profile backgrounds, is @FPTheFluffyPawed 's background concidered "NSFW"? Sorry to revive old thread
What exactly is wrong with it?
no bags of flesh allowed
I don't have a problem with it but I'm sure someone will See? Told you
You are flat-out stating that this is a personal problem on your part in this post.
That's not saying what could be potentially wrong with it. What is it that you see that people could have a problem with, even if YOU don't?
Sorry if I worded it wrong, but I'm less concered about the content and moreso if it is allowed, for my own sake I don't know, I'm just trying to make sure that it isn't a problem. If I, or someone else, wanted to put this on their background and it gets reported/flagged, it wouldn't be very fair. Like you said, I don't know why it would be a problem but I know that some of those megachristians/youngins will rage about a bit of lewdness.
Basic rule of thumb is it: Hardcore Porn Gore Underaged If the answer is yes to any of that that, don't use it.
It makes sense that people don't want things like guts, dismemberment, dead bodies, broken bones, exploding heads and similar stuff in wallpapers/backgrounds. Though it seems that @ThighHighSuccubi 's background will be nuked the moment the needed tools are available to the moderators, even though it lacks all that stuff (except for blood). If this is the consensus then some further clarification would be required in the official rules. Ie. calling it "graphic violence" or something similar. This is just an observation, I have no personal objections against that background.
I think it goes without saying that consumption of bodily fluids isn't allowed on your backgrounds. We couldn't possibly make a list of every single gross thing ever that you shouldn't post, because somebody will always find something equally gross that's not technically on the list.
Is my background even that bad? It's not even gorey, it's just blood. Not even cropped gore.
oh thought it was ketchup
The worst part about is that it's tiled because you didn't use the proper size I dunno, I guess it's nasty if you're squeamish? I personally don't care about it tbh.
I'll change it if ya'll gonna be like this ab it smh smh I have the coins now anyway
Make it one with anime tiddies just to spite people.
There I changed it are you guys HAPPY geez
nah its still anime trash m8
Does anyone else find Polidicks less intriguing than ever before? I can't tell if I'm going apathetic or if things have actually settled down a little bit. The news just seems so much less interesting.
What does this even mean
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.