Cooliest/Uglest Weapons v10 - FAL Pride World Wide
999 replies, posted
He's done videos on some Khyber Pass guns way back, I'd say he'd rather fire the Isard than any of those things.
There was also that Vietnamese blowback 1911 copy.
And the Chinese mystery pistols.
Chinese mystery pistols? What,do you mean those Mauser C96 copies they produced?
Nah, he means the Chinese Mystery Pistols:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HNaB7l2GQk
Ya lost me here
The PP19 is an AK. The PP90M1 is not an AK.
I know, I was trying to make a "why would you make a gun that's not an AK" joke and it did not work
Aaah, I suspect it would need more quotations and ""russian"" grammar.
lol
https://i.redd.it/whoexwo2dom11.jpg
"Be strong, Vladimir. Be strong for rodina."
Pink is actually decent camo in the desert, SAS painted their jeeps pink in north africa during WW2.
But judging by the background, that's not desert.
It's a bit more specific than that. Pink is good in desert sunset and sunrise. SAS painted them pink 'cause they'd be most visible in dawn and dusk, and you also see RAF recon planes painted pink because they'd operate in those early/late hours too to identify troop movements.
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/210225/2dab345c-09ce-4b73-aae2-a343709d4af6/79d17df0c0c429d38ba9279d092a9ffe.jpg
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/210225/18ab80f0-1e69-4cde-8aec-65b2b79d93f9/500px-BuckyHoldsM249BTS.jpg
Looks cool but is probably incredibly unreliable.
Mostly unreliable because quadstacks are unreliable.
I dunno 'bout that. I hear those surefire casket mags have picked up in reliability.
Now they're mostly just expensive.
I think it has less to do with the magazine itself and more to do with the fact that the M249 isn't really built to handle magazines like that, something to do with the feed system.
From what I've been told, you have to kinda grip the stanag a certain way if you want it to feed reliably in a 249. I wanna say you have to push it forward, but it's been about 4 years since I got that info.
Generally speaking dual-feeding mechanisms tend to bias in favor of one over the other. It's just kinda the nature of adding a second feed position onto an existing system, the original system, in this case the belt feed, is much better integrated into the overall design.