• Unpopular Opinions V9 trump is ok
    999 replies, posted
Nah, that's my invention. The lasagna sandwich, or lasagndwich.
Not really a huge fan of lasagna, though that's probably only because I remember at least a decade ago I was eating it for dinner while sick (or maybe that may have been what made me sick), and I ended up vomiting. That might fall under your former explanation, though :V
The hell is that?
The food of people who have given up.
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/113069/61200854-5bd8-4ca4-a40c-f44f147bdf67/image.png
God left us long ago and this is why
I think you're underestimating how many of us are lazy, disgusting idiots who prefer instant ramen uncooked I mean haha what, that totally wasn't too specific or anything
They're meant for the apocalypse.
I'm far more forgiving than many of my countrymen when it comes to such things, but we must drawn a line somewhere
the most horrifying thing is that some people like to eat those uncooked
I have eaten uncooked ramen, not that bad tbh for a snack.
In highschool, there was someone in my class that did this. They ate uncooked top ramen at morning break and lunch every day. To this day, I'm still baffled by it.
Well, I don't know from what kind of backwater, barbaric country are you from, but here in Italy the lasagna is usually prepared with bèchamel sauce (basically you must spread some of it on each layer, along with the tomato and meat sauce) with some Parmigiano as topping. Using the ricotta for the lasagna is, as far as I know, unknown of here. Which makes sense, as the lasagna is already one hell of a substantial dish in itself without the need to fill it with one of the fattest cheese in existence
The US. But he's actually not off on what he's saying. Ricotta is pretty common in lasagna here. I can't say for certain why that is but parmigiano-reggiano isn't a common cheese here at all so it's probably a substitute for that.
You’re part of the furry fandom if you are a fan of anthro. The definition of a fan is subjective. Consider whether you’d be seen as a hypocrite if you ragged on furries.
unnatural hair dye looks shitty and makes you look like an idiot
no u
Spot the green haired fiend
Depends on hairstyle, and colour... And how it's done
Despite it's flaws the Saints Row series is still better than the Grand Theft Auto series.
If it's integrated well it can look pretty fantastic. Ofc, the same rule that applies to normal fashion also applies to hair; don't make yourself look like an anime in day-to-day life.
undercuts are cute though
they're pretty low on the tier list for short-hair cuts imo they used to look pretty good on men until all of the nazis began getting undercuts
Girls with weird colour hair are piff ting
United States cuisine is pretty boring in generally So is most of western Europe, Like Germany, and Northern Europe (Italy, France and Spain are exceptions) Like Scandinavian food is pretty bland
It's actually the other way around, you usually pair heavy sauces with thick pasta, say fettucine. But to each is his own.
Because it's not really comedy, he uses that as a defence but he hardly demonstrates it
It's actively deceptive and he defends himself by both saying that it is satire and at the same time active as though he is a serious commentator by nitpicking very dumb details that are not funny at all he also exclusively rides on popularity instead of making good content that is paced out in gaps.
They have no understanding of how film stories work, they edit clips to make them seem worse, thy give 'sins' for things that aren't in the film, they give 'sins' for something that isn't explained and then give a 'sin' for the explanation. I've never seen them make a clever joke. Though dumb joke is usually a step up from their 'humorous' commentary. CinemaSins do not give any legitimate criticism, they misconstrue almost every clip they show and almost always fail to understand the film as a whole. If it's not accurate it's not criticism. Either it's accurate and meant as serious criticism or it's not accurate and meant as a joke. It can't be both at once. Having a lazy format does not excuse shoddy research and terrible comedy. It's not comedy, comedy is funny. And I'm not saying the comedy isn't to my taste, I mean that it doesn't have humour or jokes in it. It's just mindless commentary which relies on the concept of 'sins' to pass as a satire without saying anything, either meaningful or humorous. What is it? Comedy meant for jokes and fun times? Then it's boring as shit and not funny. Is is a serious critique of a film? Then it's lying and fails to understand its subject matter. So yeah, I won't watch it. I won't give it a pass and let people act like it's not shit either. It only really gets shat on when people try to defend it. Most people don't care about CinemaSins, they pull in their million or so views a video by riding on the popularity of current film releases and everyone else ignores them, until a CinemaSins fan tries to insist that it's actually really good guys just give it a chance. It isn't the worst thing to happen to film critique, personally I'd say the rise of vloggers who praise fucking everything is much worse, but it's still bottom of the barrel quality. And it's easy to write an essay on how bad CinemaSins is because of the wealth of material to examine.
This video is long but does a great job of breaking down precisely why CinemaSins is stupid and actively harmful to film as an art form. https://youtu.be/ELEAsGoP-5I
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.