• <1 days ago?
    8 replies, posted
Looks a bit stupid in my opinion. Why not just keep it as "0 days ago"
how about the number of hours instead of a 200s esque non-responsive "1 days"
I don't know why I am laughing so much at this.
I'm totally fine with the current system because <1 days basically just means that the thread is fresh. Conversion to hours would inflate the numbers and it wouldn't look as nice as a contrast to the viewcount next to it.
No because then you get a mess of "4 days ago // 2 months ago // 1 year ago" and the big bold numbers cease to be useful. If you vary your units, you gotta have the whole thing equally readable. Ideally, it wouldn't be its own column and it would just show up next to the author.
I think to make new threads stand out a bit more, we could show an icon there instead of <1
Could have NEW! there
https://i.imgur.com/uCC4b9n.png
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.