Jordan Peterson only eats beef and drinks water. It somehow cured his depresson.
150 replies, posted
Except on Facepunch there's usually well documented reasons behind said circlejerks which you might easily miss because it makes you uncomfortable.
You can't just procrailm something as a circlejerk or a hugbox or whatever just because you disagree with it. You ought to start actually listening some more
these
are
shit
posts
what narrative have I made up? I'm sure others can vouch that people were never really in agreement about JP here (besides a few) until recently.
and, as I said, these shitposts come after you were unable to defend your position in a recent JP thread. now instead of an explicit defence, it's 'im not defending JP but wowee why do you guys dislike him'
maybe if you read what people said last time, or this time, or any other time you'd see.
dude i've been waiting for you to show me this "unable to defend yourself" thing but you keep going off on a tangent with your emotional posting style
are you gonna respond
You have life figured out, huh?
can you type regularly please, I really don't want to read your emotional ramblings I just want to get to the point...
emblematic behavior of the group you've decided to put yourself in
I wonder how much of this diet is a placebo. I genuinely dont think he's lying about the benefits it had to his daughter and himself, but I feel like a good portion of it may be in his head. (Maybe less so his daughter, considering he only recently adopted it).
this isn’t clever and just proves him right lol
whyare people acting so god damn smarmy these days
Proves him right? How exactly?
read what bobs has said. Has bobs defended Peterson here? Done anything to protect him or anything of the sort? Oh? No? He hasn’t? Yet the posts responding to him are creating a false narrative?
Rather than actually doing the work people just use the rating like it proves them right. Is bob guilty of anything he’s accused of doing here? How could anyone know because all I can see are replies to him that are smarmy and disregard anything he actually said to put words in his mouth.
I dont even really like bobs, as he’s shared some opinions in ways I don’t personally like, but I can recognize that this behaviour in this thread is pure circle jerk territory
More along the lines of evidence of absence being absence of evidence. He's pretty clearly allergic, and by that I mean deeply systemically allergic to asome shit that he's no longer in contact with, but a straight meat diet isn't a thing anywhere, even in the arctic circle, and there's reasons for that. In the AC they eat the entire animal, esp the organs because if you don't, you'll get sick and die. Muscle alone is not a thing anywhere.
hi sorry
my notifications weren't showing up
Think what you will, but this guy is a treasure in our modern society. He actually is capable of conceding points and listening to the opposition; something a lot more people should start doing.
Brevity may be the soul of wit; but anyone who says "he uses big words" as a detractor is a serious dolt, you included.
At a point it's impossible to even tell what you're arguing against.
What is it with a lot of you and dissecting peoples comments? Can you not address my points well enough that you need to edit my words and rearrange context?
And I don't know about you but nearly all of those comments had a point they were addressing... The first comment was my opening statement in the thread; the second was in response to people saying that Jordan Peterson merely uses big words to "sound smart" (which is an idiots claim in my opinion); the third was in response to the emotional lambasting and strawmanning I was receiving; and the fourth one was me being an asshole; sure I'll give you that.
See, I could actually give context for my posts unlike you could. Actually, you could have given context seeing as you probably spent a couple hours looking back through my posts and you most likely knew the dynamic of the threads you were looking back into; but you just decided not to so you could score some easy points by making a big dramatic take-down post. lol
those quotes are from one argument, not missing reams of context as you're implying. further, context of a previous argument has nothing to do with whether or not you could claim that either you don't defend JP or that I'm 'making a narrative up' (about you backing JP). the fact that this previous argument exists at all is what's required to prove that wrong.
and, seeing as though wanna talk about that thread, you weren't emotionally lambasted or strawmanned, you made a point, got talked down, then left like an asshole. hence 'could not defend his position'.
where's my false narrative? what context is required here that I haven't given?
Getting "talked down" on this site is
getting
a post
like this where
its just fictitiously long
to emphasize emotion
and how much of a bad person i am
So yeah, I left the thread after the conversation started becoming about pointless bullshit. Dude completely changed the subject like always happens with emotional wrecks; so I peaced out. Thought about doing it again here but you seem to be controlling yourself a tad better for I'm pleased to see that.
if it cured his depression he wouldnt need to eat "only beef" anymore. its called treatment
Your assumption depression is a mental only phenomenon is false.
What? that's not the argument he made at all
you assume that i assume that, which is false (i dont)
JORDAN PETERSON THREAD LIFE CYCLE:
New video comes out and gets posted.
In the video Jordies catastrophically puts his foot in his mouth again.
Everyone laughs at that part.
"but you didn't explain what was actually wrong with what he said"
5 people explain it to that person.
"You're taking him out of context!"
Zyler steals diamonds that I was gonna get by posting a wall of quotes and videos that explain JBP's entire worldview and how this quote is a continuation of JBP's long-held beliefs.
"But he helped me in other ways!"
Someone posts a video of JBP saying some ancient aliens ridiculous type bullshit.
1 page of people trying to hold on to their messiah, mostly talking to convince themselves that they haven't fallen for a con.
White dwarf stage: Users are locked into a battle to the death over the definition of some word. <-- You are here.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.