Renegade Cut makes a video on Gamergate (and Ready Player One)
257 replies, posted
Yeah I guess you're so confident that I'm a huge fucking troll or whatever that you refuse to even talk to me. Oh well, can lead a horse to water but can't make em drink.
No we are just going off of previous encounters with you. You never listen to the evidence we give you, and you remain willingly ignorant. Funny you mention the horse analogy, because that is literally what we've experienced with you.
I don't think I'm that set in my opinions? My stance on gun control has shifted over the years and a large reason why is facepunch. But okay.
Dude, I like you, so take this from me as earnestly as you can.
Look what ASparkle did when he got what he asked for.
He rejected it, ignored it, and put his horse blinders on to keep plugging the same hollow, and now debunked argument.
Just look at him and how shamelessly he did that, and has done that in every single fucking thread about this.
You do the same thing often, albeit in a different tone. But the same pattern plays out.
People provide, it's ignored because of unknown, and ungiven reasons and the argument repeats ad infinitium.
Because there really isn't at this point. It's the truth. It's a giant cluster that people (as evidenced in this thread) will still lie willingly about.
Maybe you guys should make one.
And that's another thing. I've asked @ASparkle multiple times what he i looking for, and I just get bunk back. I'd love to be able to explain and give him info, and I'd gladly do the same for you, but all I ever get is vague brushes that don't really go anywhere.
Anything worth doing is bound to be difficult.
like going back and reading the posts with the evidence you asked for
I'm not creating a video that lets people like Asparkle act like i'm an alt-right mouth piece because he doesn't like what's being said.
We've already had proof in the form of him, and yourself, that no amount of evidence or factual refutation of your points will ever be well recieved, and frankly, I'm not going to create a video that nets me a poor, and ill fitting reputation. I'm a very liberal person, yet people like ASparkle and even yourself to some degree, really seem to struggle to reconcile the fact that you can have politically similar folks disagree with you on this issue without being monsters.
If such a video was created, would you even do anyone here the favour of taking that information into account or would you, as we've seen already, ignore the evidence and continue repeating yourself?
Reading things that don't exist is pretty hard unless you hallucinate.
Rate me bad reading all you want Sparkles, you're the one who failed to read
1) The "proof" you used to "prove" your argument
2) the evidence of Harper doxxing people
You have no legs to stand on, and as is customary for you, you will refrain from actually posting any cogent arguments on the topic.
Instead of lying, try posting a coherent question.
Hey bud, maybe when you link proof that Liz was involved in something, it should show she was, yet your "Proof" failed to show that, yet you hammered that shit down like a god damn nuclear brief case and all that came out of it was a wet sour fart of you failing to even read what you'd posted. You're like the Boilrig of this subject.
You also failed to read, or even remember what you asked for, or were given.
You asked for proof Harper doxxed people. That was given to you.
You believe that because there was some contention in the AGG world about this, that it's proof that AGG was against Doxxing.
Yet, you fail to reconcile that many of the GG banner also decried people who doxxed people and disowned them as we saw AGG doing there, something you fundamentally are okay with accepting, but fail to apply evenly to each side.
Your transparent. You're flimsy arguments fall apart when even asked rudimentary questions. Yet you continue to peddle the same hollow, and empty arguments no matter what happens.
You are literally the boilrig of this topic.
This level of projecting could seriously give IMAX a run for their money. You claimed Harper doxxed someone, your "proof" was two reddit posts and some random alt-right blog, of the "sources" you had, the blog offered nothing of substance, and both of the reddit posts directly contradicted your claim.
Neither reddit sourced contradicted the claim. They both had numerous proofs that Harper had done it. Some people in those reddit threads supported the actions, some did not.
You literally did not read this post when you yourself made it, so if you think I'm projecting, what do you think the rest of us think about you, when you clearly did not the "proof" you submitted?
You LITERALLY did not read your own fucking post that you used as evidence and you want to lecture me on "Projecting"? Child, please.
Stop post
I can't speak for ASparkle because i don't really know them but I'm not trying to come at you guys with any Ill intent.
Do it anyway. If you're confident what you say is true than detractors shouldn't matter.
We live in a time where court of public opinion is more damning than the actual courts.
No fucking thank you.
People who are entirely innocent of harming anyone else have had their lives ruined by supporting political points of view that are counter narrative. I don't want to be another one of those people to be slandered by fuck nuts on the internet who have no concept of "Nuance".
Are you just trolling now? Because I really don't know how else you can post blogs that defend Richard Spencer and push Q conspiracy theories, and then claim that's not alt-right.
Huh, that's weird, I literally don't see anything about qanon or richard spencer but sure, you can just imagine whatever the fuck you want, clearly nothing has ever stopped you doing that before.
Lmao your turn to post proof
I think that's the main issue here. I've asked for sources on things before and I get sent to places like ED, the Gamergate wiki (which has a glowing profile on Milo, even after everything that's come out about him) and screencaps devoid of any context. A lot of these websites and archives can take hours to trawl through and are wrought with bias, snark and whataboutism. They often read like the person writing them got fuckin' pissed half way through and just started hyperbolizing.
I get the feeling that the reason we don't have a proGG summarization that doesnt use terms like "virtue signaling" or accusing people of being conmen or whatever is because if we did, maybe some of the people who were a part of that movement might have to admit that the harassment wasn't a false flag, it wasn't justified and that the people pushing for "ethics" tended to enable the people in it for harassment.
Like, you're not a shitty person for being proGG, you're not a misogynist or any of that. The people you opposed weren't perfect either, but this revisionism is pretty blatant and sad.
Can you even read?
https://www.oneangrygamer.net/?s=Pizzagate&submit=Search
I mean I could give you feedback on it if you're that afraid people will give you shit over it.
You mean a link that literally won't open?
Nice proof
Check your internet connection, or just stop grasping at straws. This is getting pathetic.
it's not opening for me either, your link is dead.
Clink on your own fucking link it literally just opens a "About:blank" page
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
