• Cs:go is free now oh and some shitty battle royal mode.
    21 replies, posted
Valve is realizing that fucking over their trading systems isn't going so well for them
https://files.gamebanana.com/img/ss/skins/75942b.jpg When???
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/1356/e3fedade-5d18-4b74-9b07-25d61d96ee47/csgosideadlol.png I think they are doing pretty well.
People playing the game does not translate to revenue, especially when they continuously shoot themselves in the kneecap with regards to their primary source of revenue.
https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/57926/928879b0-27c6-49b4-a796-0b027da2a180/image.png lmao literally the same model as l4d https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/57926/7adc0eae-9509-4265-81e7-000bb7f15a16/image.png
what in the goddamn?
In fairness smart re-usage of assets is a pretty good way to save on development time and resources, especially when the same assets get the job done and is consistent with the rest of the game's visuals. Same goes for anytime they re-use generic props like crates and barrels.
I was going to ask how the hell they got Source to handle a hundred players and giant maps. But no, it's 16 players, 18 in a stretch. More like Last Man Standing, with some typical 2018 survival elements tacked on.
Looks kind of janky
Lol 18 players?
The best gameplay aspect of Danger Zone is that every bullet counts. When you take ammunition from ammo boxes, you can only get 1 bullet per take. In this mode you don't spray. You are pretty much running around with a max of magazine around.
they're working on moving CSGO over to Source 2 afaik
I bet you they haven't even been actively developing Source 2 the last few years, because 75 percent of their development staff has been working on fucking Artifact. That's what happens when your company structure is based around cliques that gain employees based on how much profit they make, because those cliques are the ones who get the biggest bonuses and are least likely to be fired.
my game wont even start after the update...
16 players? Seems too small of a number.
Head to this thread: Counter
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.