It's important to remember that at the end of the day there's a person behind each account, mods or regular users alike.
I think most everyone here genuinely likes and respects the guy even if they disagree with his political stance as of late. BDA is a valued member of the community, I'd buy him a beer for some of the threads he's organized in the past. Career advice, etc.
I know I'm more radical in my views than I was 3 years ago and think most of you would say the same. I think BDA has more in common with most FP'ers than not, seems like some are getting hung up on the details while we squabble in the polidicks echo chamber.
Maybe what happened is he just cared less about consequence on fp and just let himself be less filtered? I'm sure quite a handful of people would be more erratic and disagreeable if etiquette wasnt a standard
I am a soulless sentient cloud. Obey.
Are you sure that I qualify as a person?
Hey, a person with cat ears is still a person
Some say she's a dragon. And that she is the first dragon with fur.
Some also say that this woman also enjoys the chain.
All we know is she's called Reagy.
The scientists have yet to come back on that one
I swear to god I'm going to stab you if you keep bringing up the chain.
It's a great song!
Yes please I like pain
its not violent if we're both screaming
@Hezzy , they're doing the weird shit again
ANYWAY. Now for something more RELATED to the forums. How's everyone feeling about the [video] tag rule?
IMO it's actually nice to just do ctrl+F [vid and away we go.
completely understandable, but it seems like half the time it's the mods themselves turning the thread into a WAYT-tier garbage pile
Ban mods 2019
how about a section.
Don't be silly
it does make it much harder for the 4000 videos to slip through annoyed grunts video section extension (big thanks to annoyed grunt BTW tis a lifesaver)
this is what you all wanted
I poured soda in my travel mug. I went to take a sip just now, pressed the autoseal button, and got a blast of carbonated air in the eye.
Something I noticed.
“Call Outs” - These are posts that call on a user to explain something even though they’re not involved in a thread. Please don’t make these unless your post actually contributes to the thread.
This definition is very narrow. I can tell who ever wrote it probably had the "EXPLAIN THIS TUDD" phrase in mind.
Is that the only thing that is considered a "dumb call out"? If I am remembering correctly "dumb call out" bans were used when a person made criticism or "e🅱️ic zinger", and it was directed at someone not present or uninvolved in the current discussion. Or it was criticizing (or "sick burn"-ing) them for something unrelated to the topic.
It's like someone burst into my house, chopped off my leg, ran off and I ended up with a crutch as a replacement
Basically hardly an ideal fix but probably the best one available considering current circumstances
I still want my leg back, Garry, where is it
being built in the development subforum
He had some major health issues as well.
Oh frig, that was meant to be on WAYT. Dunno how that happened.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.