[QUOTE=G-Foxx;17216736][media]http://www.wallpaperbase.com/wallpapers/military/f22raptor/f_22_raptor_1.jpg[/media]
you gona die[/QUOTE]
OMG IM SO FUCKEN SCARED LOL!!!!!1!!1!
But really those things aren't that good, they're just fast as fuck.
[QUOTE=Wordsworth;17215808]LAV-25/Piranah pics[/QUOTE]
I just want to say :hfive:
AH-64 D for me too.
You can carry a loadout of 1 or two hydra launchers, and 2 or three racks of hellfires. Add in about 1200 rounds of 30mm and you have badass.
Mig 29 [media]http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/fighter/mig29/mig29_12.jpg[/media]
A-10 [media]http://www.fas.org/programs/ssp/man/moremanpics/a-10_1.jpg[/media]
All I can think of now, I'm tired.
9K22 Tunguska - Soviet AA vehicle
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a9/VDay_Parade_Rehearsal_Moscow03.jpg[/img]
Its got fucking rockets and 2 30mm machine gun cannons.
I don't know why but I get a fucking rage-gasm/orgasm when I fucking see this thing.
[editline]10:18PM[/editline]
Also my current wallpaper for some time now
[B]T-64 Main Battle Tank[/B]
When it was introduced the T-64 Main Battle Tank was the greatest tank of it's time, apart from the T-72 the T-64 was well designed and considered superior to the T-72 in many ways. But its costly production led to it's downfall and the T-64 was never exported and many of it's features where adapted to the T-80.
[img]http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/mcnelly/msh/images/historical_photos/T-64a.jpg[/img]
[img]http://armor.kiev.ua/Tanks/Modern/T64/t64_49.jpg[/img]
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/T64_21.jpg[/img]
[B]F-35[/B]
[img]http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/AIR_F-35A_Frontal_ATK_lg.jpg[/img]
This bad boy has got everything the F-22 has plus it's a VTOL!
[B]UH-60 Blackhawk[/B]
[img]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_4aNto1NiGcY/RdAc0enZ6BI/AAAAAAAACXM/x5xalPkHFB4/s400/blackhawk.jpg[/img]
I just love this heli, I don't really know why but i just think it's the best chopper ever.
[B]Now I present to you the greatest method of transportation of all time![/B]
[B]GENTELMEN! BEHOLD!![/B]
[img]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_pBdLYpC6ZYA/SC7-T9EzOhI/AAAAAAAADrY/mix_fDHguQM/s400/14.jpg[/img]
[B][highlight]LEGS!!![/highlight][/B]
[QUOTE=Zatharon;17211698][QUOTE=Morphology53;17211156]
Try the turret.[/QUOTE]
Guy in the turret gets shot first.[/QUOTE]
My complete lack of bullet-holes makes your point moot.
Not my favorite but i like it
the b-1b gentlemen
[img]http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/b-1b/images/b-1b_4.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=cashman123;17222093]
[B]GENTELMEN! BEHOLD!![/B]
[img]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_pBdLYpC6ZYA/SC7-T9EzOhI/AAAAAAAADrY/mix_fDHguQM/s400/14.jpg[/img]
[B][highlight]LEGS!!![/highlight][/B][/QUOTE]
Your pants seem to be on backwards
The Multiple Launch Rocket System, MLRS
[img]http://www.haaland.info/norway/army/bilder/mlrs-notpainted.jpg[/img]
The system is capable of firing guided and unguided projectiles to a distance of up to 42 km (26.1 miles). Firing ballistic missiles, (such as the U.S. Army Tactical Missile System—ATACMS) it is capable of reaching out to 300 km (186 miles) with the warhead reaching a maximal altitude of ~50 km (164,000 ft). The M270 is a very mobile unit, thus well suited for the so called shoot-and-scoot tactic: it can fire its rockets very rapidly and immediately move away to avoid returning counter-battery fire.
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ru/2/25/VDayParade2009Cropped.jpg[/img]
I still wonder if the usual soviet "Tanks-can-drive-in-the-fucking-nuclear-wasteland" still applies to it.
Well, here waiting for the next generation.
Also:
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/94/KW-2_1940.jpg[/img]
That thing shoots as far as artillery can. Slow, ponderous, armored... a few of those, and a few intelligent commanders, and Manerheims line would've been as good as gone, without such casualties.
Merkava, the Israeli MBT
[MEDIA]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/66/Merkava4-pic006.jpg[/MEDIA]
Big image
[img]http://david.australianinfront.com.au/Interesting/landkreuzer.jpg[/img]
[b]Landkreuzer P. 1000 Ratte[/b]
It was 100% Hilter approved, but the project was cancelled by Albert Speer.
Damn If it wasn't cancelled, what could have happened?
[QUOTE=Zorgoth64;17223939][img]http://david.australianinfront.com.au/Interesting/landkreuzer.jpg[/img]
[b]Landkreuzer P. 1000 Ratte[/b]
It was 100% Hilter approved, but the project was cancelled by Albert Speer.
Damn If it wasn't cancelled, what could have happened?[/QUOTE]
Wait that was going to be built?
[QUOTE=faze;17223962]Wait that was going to be built?[/QUOTE]
yes.
And We would have probably lost if it was completed.
I'm sure only a few could have been afforded though.
[QUOTE=faze;17223995]I'm sure only a few could have been afforded though.[/QUOTE]
true, but that'd still be too much for our forces, especially if the german's had an aircraft big enough to cary them to the states.
then there was the Landkreuzer P. 1500 Monster.
This is what it was going to look like.
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/P1500_Monster.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=Zorgoth64;17224005]true, but that'd still be too much for our forces, especially if the german's had an aircraft big enough to cary them to the states.
then there was the Landkreuzer P. 1500 Monster.
This is what it was going to look like.
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/P1500_Monster.gif[/img][/QUOTE]
Meh, that's what bombs are for, and rocket launchers. There would be ways to take them out.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
