Coolest/Ugliest Vehicles - General

The remake seems shorter, and the headlights are way too busy. Probably also the lack of a more muscular and pronounced body. It's too rounded. The back seems like it came from a new Audi, and the front bumper is, again, too busy, for the sake of aerodynamics or whatever. I don't dislike it, by all means, but it really isn't as striking as the original. It just seems like yet another sports car. Speaking about Audis, a TT would probably be more striking to me, but I am probably biased.

[t]https://cnet1.cbsistatic.com/img/theIJdUgz0WPq2Ksec87OJD9B7s=/1600x900/2017/10/25/d9642e33-e579-4a55-ae54-b87be6bdf882/subaru-viziv-performance-concept-26.jpg[/t][t]https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--DVWZz90g--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_1600/rmmubcu9r5rp0ulsqe71.jpg[/t] Subaru Viziv concept which could become the new WRX

[QUOTE=StrykerE;53199816][t]https://cnet1.cbsistatic.com/img/theIJdUgz0WPq2Ksec87OJD9B7s=/1600x900/2017/10/25/d9642e33-e579-4a55-ae54-b87be6bdf882/subaru-viziv-performance-concept-26.jpg[/t][t]https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--DVWZz90g--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_1600/rmmubcu9r5rp0ulsqe71.jpg[/t] Subaru Viziv concept which could become the new WRX[/QUOTE] God I hope it stays a coupe.

[QUOTE=StrykerE;53199816][t]https://cnet1.cbsistatic.com/img/theIJdUgz0WPq2Ksec87OJD9B7s=/1600x900/2017/10/25/d9642e33-e579-4a55-ae54-b87be6bdf882/subaru-viziv-performance-concept-26.jpg[/t][t]https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--DVWZz90g--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_1600/rmmubcu9r5rp0ulsqe71.jpg[/t] Subaru Viziv concept which could become the new WRX[/QUOTE] FYI this can be driven in GT Sport

[QUOTE=BF;53200836]FYI this can be driven in GT Sport[/QUOTE] Does it sound like a vacuum cleaner? :v:

[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;53198357]yall seen the new alpine, right? [t]https://car-images.bauersecure.com/pagefiles/74009/1040x585/alpine-a110-01.jpg[/t] clean, sleek design in its own right, but it's nowhere near as striking as the original. i'm sure i'd like it more if i was judging it in a vacuum, but it's impossible not to compare[/QUOTE] This is probably heresy but I think it would look way better with just two headlights, even if the classic had the extra set (foglights?)

[QUOTE=weyu6572;53201004]Does it sound like a vacuum cleaner? :v:[/QUOTE] [media]https://youtu.be/a1L_8gGmjA4[/media] Sadly... yes.

I want a JCW Hardtop Mini so bad. https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/774/1f3faa13-aed8-4fe9-a4d9-c87b4527d20e/1521125921900.jpg

I drove behind one of those on my drive down to Illinois this weekend, and dear god the pops the exhaust made were amazing. Content-wise, I really like my car, but I understand why some people have this generation of Civic. https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/133361/171c4720-2368-4768-a2a3-d6272be3def3/IMG_2410.JPG

The new Civic Coupe really grew on me, I think it's pretty awesome. Certainly better than the hatchback which really is more of a liftback because of that shape. http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/storyimage/CA/20160301/OEM04/160229865/AR/0/Honda1.jpg

That BF fella was certainly onto something with those AU Fortès. Lovely https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/226043/59e913b4-5031-48ca-8eb0-cf4ce5c4584a/IMG_0999.JPG

https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/111575/93f58fa9-b7b9-4795-a630-feb7353d7719/image.png pure orgasm

offspring of brother and sister

Okay but for realsies, the AU is a massive in-joke in Australian car culture. Everyone hated it when it was released, and the only people who like it now do so ironically fucking tops mate. Park your ass in a TE50 https://youtu.be/05RadZEISig

have a 1m https://s.aolcdn.com/dims-global/dims3/GLOB/legacy_thumbnail/916x515/quality/95/http://www.blogcdn.com/slideshows/images/slides/251/508/5/S2515085/slug/l/01-dinan-s3-bmw-1m-review-1.jpg http://o.aolcdn.com/hss/storage/adam/f115240c5af0666a24be829d283bea49/dinan-s3-bmw-1m- http://cdn.bmwblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/bmw-1m-coupe-valencia-orange-1-830x553.jpg http://www.autoclassmagazine.com/web/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/BMW-1M-Coupe-2-Auto-Class-Magazine-810x446_c.jpg

If it’s pure orgasm, then why do so many people go out of their way to fucking ruin them? Haha. Good luck finding an R32, R33 or R34, whether a GT, GTS, GT-T or GT-R, in Australia that hasn’t been utterly ruined by a ricer. It’s literally newsworthy when a clean example is put up for sale.

The Dongfeng EQ2050 has a pretty cool front end in my opinion. https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/211511/a1c1b88e-d73a-4b36-b939-e1163ef5048d/Dongfeng EQ2050.jpg

The current Civic's and Corollas look so much better than previous generations imo. + Mazda really pushing the envelope of reasonably priced cars and it's a great time to be a boring economy car owner

This is my uncle's car https://puu.sh/wX1cv.png It was hard to take a picture of it because of the barn thing it was in, but this is an original Mercedes w124 wagon limousine. Here's a picture of another one I found on the internet: https://puu.sh/wX1DV.png I think it's really fucking cool...

That's pretty fucking sweet man. Deserves a detail work.

woah thats an actually rare car for sure

I'm 1 month away from buying a 2003 Skoda Octavia 1.8T, I wish it was the VRS though. This thing is such a badass sleeper, definitely planning on atleast shipping some wheels and exterior trim pieces because I'm such a boyracer. https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/774/44a3ea91-d600-4854-ad4e-6b29b09a72cc/octavia2.jpg

Sleepers are great. I hate cars which scream in your face that they are all sporty and aggressive. Clean and understated appearance is my favourite car styling. And yeah, no one expects a Skoda haha. the G6 range in the FG series looked like shit (obviously because it’s not an AU), but once upon a time I did contemplate a G6E Turbo. Looks like an average family sedan, yet it’s got a 4.0L turbocharged inline 6 up front, drive sent to the rear, 270kW/360bhp peak power, peak torque as low as 2,000rpm, and a 0-100km/h time of around 5 seconds. https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/226043/f4b189a4-eda9-4494-90dd-bab36201609e/4644821A-5FC8-40DF-8C75-BD1483BE8532.jpeg https://files.facepunch.com/forum/upload/226043/e6056035-7e75-4873-a461-8b2f8763442d/A8982C1B-C757-4C03-ABC0-05676B7BD511.jpeg

only Falcons that legit look good are XB, XY, BA/BF (in particular with XR bodykits), and some of the older ones i cant think of off the top of my head front ends of FGs are particularly hideous Commodores have always been nicer looking cars tbh.

The only good looking Falcons are clearly AUs

Recent GTA update added a Supra after many years of waiting. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DYvIWIKW4AAMmlH.jpg The bad news is that: 1) It lacks customisablity 2) The model looks off proportion wise 3) It has a RB copy in it instead of a 2JZ https://i.imgur.com/YqKX7hB.jpg Somehow Rockstar could turn a beauty and do it so many wrongs.

The worst offence is online only. I despise rockstar for that. I get that they "need" money, but fuck off with the monetization.

I don’t think Rockstar were gonna bother buying the rights to have the Supra in their game, just so that a hundred or so dedicated players could park one in their virtual garage.

It's not about the fact that it's not licensed, it's about the fact that this is a very lazy and shoddily done work. Just look at the Elegy Retro Custom from a previous update https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/516/30776452894_ba9b5923ce_h.jpg https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/450/31245544580_44f097dbbc_h.jpg It's night and days in terms of quality compared to the Supra look alike in the new update. More customization and better proportions.

And more quality. Or is the supra picture on low settings?