[QUOTE=Stonecycle;48728757]Ya'll getting musical? What you hosers need is some good ol' fashioned heavy metal for the soul. That's all you need to know.
[IMG]https://d.maxfile.ro/rfccysioru.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]
[video=youtube;X7wxOmixIgU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7wxOmixIgU[/video]
in a match of skullgirls with wingz:
"wingz is now offline"
[I]
"that's a wrap, folks"[/I]
:disappoint:
I've been laughing at this picture for 20 years
[img]http://i.imgur.com/swWdZ59.png[/img]
The persona 5 OP is looking good so far too.
[video=youtube;TBofQ_WgKdw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBofQ_WgKdw[/video]
[QUOTE=ZnT00;48728775]in a match of skullgirls with wingz:
"wingz is now offline"
[I]
"that's a wrap, folks"[/I]
:disappoint:[/QUOTE]
I guess he couldn't, [i][b]face the music.[/b][/i]
[QUOTE=Dr._Medic;48728761]Metal is fucking awesome
Give me some band suggestions uncle stone[/QUOTE]
If my Spotify playlist's anything to go by: Dio, Grave Digger, Armored Saint, Winter's Bane, Primal Fear, Saxon, Fight, Manowar, Black Sabbath, and Judas Priest (Owens > Halford I swear I'll fight you to the death on that Infab).
[QUOTE=Infab;48728771]- Leather Rebel -[/QUOTE]
Bullet Train, mang. Or Machine Man. You afraid of a little parental advisory sticker?
[QUOTE=yellowoboe;48728782]I guess he couldn't, [i][b]face the music.[/b][/i][/QUOTE]
more like
[quote]11:28 PM - Wingz: b
11:28 PM - Wingz: s
11:28 PM - Wingz: o
11:28 PM - Wingz: d
[/quote]
[QUOTE=loco;48728781]The persona 5 OP is looking good so far too.
[video=youtube;TBofQ_WgKdw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBofQ_WgKdw[/video][/QUOTE]
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kSDJmOCKZg[/media]
Really digging the songs so far
[QUOTE=ZnT00;48728795]more like[/QUOTE]
Sub me in.
I can push buttons
[QUOTE=loco;48728803]Sub me in.
I can push buttons[/QUOTE]
u better take the challenge
[t]http://sharex.moe/i/2015/09/15-09-21_13-28-53.png[/t]
I set it up yesturday and left the hash run overnight
so much manual linking left to do ;_;
Pity I broke my windows server
Installed a Command Line version accidently
misplaced my boot drive
Got really confused for a second on my class list and almost dropped a class that I literally just got put in. Scary as shit because today was the last day to enroll in classes and if I dropped that class I would of been under units and would of been kicked out of the school.
[editline]20th September 2015[/editline]
Welp time to write a paper on how the goal of homosexual marriage and having children in the LGBTIAQ+ community is actually not constructive due to lots of reasons. (Don't worry I'm all for gay marriage and gay adoption of children/having children but it's a long story involving controversial documents and stuff.)
[QUOTE=splenda;48728811]Got really confused for a second on my class list and almost dropped a class that I literally just got put in. Scary as shit because today was the last day to enroll in classes and if I dropped that class I would of been under units and would of been kicked out of the school.
[editline]20th September 2015[/editline]
[B]Welp time to write a paper on how the goal of homosexual marriage and having children in the LGBTIAQ+ community is actually not constructive due to lots of reasons. [/B](Don't worry I'm all for gay marriage and gay adoption of children/having children but it's a long story involving controversial documents and stuff.)[/QUOTE]
?????????
[editline]20th September 2015[/editline]
that seems wildly non sequitur
[QUOTE=splenda;48728811]Got really confused for a second on my class list and almost dropped a class that I literally just got put in. Scary as shit because today was the last day to enroll in classes and if I dropped that class I would of been under units and would of been kicked out of the school.
[editline]20th September 2015[/editline]
[B]Welp time to write a paper on how the goal of homosexual marriage and having children in the LGBTIAQ+ community is actually not constructive due to lots of reasons. (Don't worry I'm all for gay marriage and gay adoption of children/having children but it's a long story involving controversial documents and stuff.)[/B][/QUOTE]
pls explain
[QUOTE=TheBrokenHobo;48728830]pls explain[/QUOTE]
you could wait for the paper
[QUOTE=Scratch.;48728839]you could wait for the paper[/QUOTE]
nah
i was asking why he's writing a paper about it in the first place
[QUOTE=ZnT00;48728775]in a match of skullgirls with wingz:
"wingz is now offline"
[I]
"that's a wrap, folks"[/I]
:disappoint:[/QUOTE]
that's what happens when you don't play real fighting games like cartoon network: punch time explosion
I FUCKING LOVE BLACK LAGOON
[editline]20th September 2015[/editline]
i finished the series like three years ago but i still love it
wayt people play skullgirls?
shit let's fight sometime
[QUOTE=Pascall;48728825]?????????[/QUOTE]
The paper is based off of this one paper about how the gay identity was a fabrication of the industrial age and people were not "gay" before the time of urbanization, in short this is due to reproduction being less of an affectual act and more of a necessity for having free labour on a farm, but once industrialization happened, living as a single person became feasible, and people were allowed to live based off of their desires rather than an instinctual survival basis. The paper also mentions how "affectual communities" need to be solidified in the queer society, and warned that marriage or other heteronormal things would lead to destroying the relatively recent "gay identity." I usually like to take positions on papers of the opposite of what I actually feel because it's more interesting to write imo, but in this case I kind of agree with the author on the whole gay identity thing. Like I'm obviously for gay marriage and having kids and stuff, this paper is for a fucking LGBT class after all, but it's just an interesting look on the subject. For example, even just a few decades ago the people campaigning for gay marriage were seen as a fringe group in the community, even by other activists. The paper was written in the 1980s too, so it's kind of a product of it's time. If you would of seen other papers I have written in the past, I have taken much more controversial stances on stuff just because I think it's fun to look at things in a different way than I usually do for a few pages.
[QUOTE=splenda;48728858]The paper is based off of this one paper about how the gay identity was a fabrication of the industrial age and people were not "gay" before the time of urbanization, in short this is due to reproduction being less of an affectual act and more of a necessity for having free labour on a farm, but once industrialization happened, living as a single person became feasible, and people were allowed to live based off of their desires rather than an instinctual survival basis. The paper also mentions how "affectual communities" need to be solidified in the queer society, and warned that marriage or other heteronormal things would lead to destroying the relatively recent "gay identity." I usually like to take positions on papers of the opposite of what I actually feel because it's more interesting to write imo, but in this case I kind of agree with the author on the whole gay identity thing. Like I'm obviously for gay marriage and having kids and stuff, this paper is for a fucking LGBT class after all, but it's just an interesting look on the subject. For example, even just a few decades ago the people campaigning for gay marriage were seen as a fringe group in the community, even by other activists. The paper was written in the 1980s too, so it's kind of a product of it's time. If you would of seen other papers I have written in the past, I have taken much more controversial stances on stuff just because I think it's fun to look at things in a different way than I usually do for a few pages.[/QUOTE]
[t]http://38.media.tumblr.com/71310246a18c84adc01200cc0500316b/tumblr_inline_mvqoul1KdJ1rfqlac.jpg[/t]
[B]aight[/B]
splenda ur so brilliant
[QUOTE=TheWhiteFox1;48728857]wayt people play skullgirls?
shit let's fight sometime[/QUOTE]
I'm always up for a match even if I'm not that great. :v:
I just got done doing a round with ZNT and that was good.
[QUOTE=Pascall;48728867][t]http://38.media.tumblr.com/71310246a18c84adc01200cc0500316b/tumblr_inline_mvqoul1KdJ1rfqlac.jpg[/t]
[B]aight[/B][/QUOTE]
Yea its a kind of weird paper. The professor even told us before the reading was assigned that "We would be outraged by the paper the first time we read it, but after reading it a few times you will start to understand what the author is saying."
[QUOTE=splenda;48728858]The paper is based off of this one paper about how the gay identity was a fabrication of the industrial age and people were not "gay" before the time of urbanization, in short this is due to reproduction being less of an affectual act and more of a necessity for having free labour on a farm, but once industrialization happened, living as a single person became feasible, and people were allowed to live based off of their desires rather than an instinctual survival basis. The paper also mentions how "affectual communities" need to be solidified in the queer society, and warned that marriage or other heteronormal things would lead to destroying the relatively recent "gay identity." I usually like to take positions on papers of the opposite of what I actually feel because it's more interesting to write imo, but in this case I kind of agree with the author on the whole gay identity thing. Like I'm obviously for gay marriage and having kids and stuff, this paper is for a fucking LGBT class after all, but it's just an interesting look on the subject. For example, even just a few decades ago the people campaigning for gay marriage were seen as a fringe group in the community, even by other activists. The paper was written in the 1980s too, so it's kind of a product of it's time. If you would of seen other papers I have written in the past, I have taken much more controversial stances on stuff just because I think it's fun to look at things in a different way than I usually do for a few pages.[/QUOTE]
i'm glad u specified this is the opposite of ur opinion because a lot of this is some of the silliest shit i've ever heard
splenda for governor
i dont really have an interest in devil's advocate stuff b/c there's already enough people who think stupid stuff without any added reason to do so
[QUOTE=PILLS HERE!;48728869]splenda ur so brilliant[/QUOTE]
Awww thanks bb.
[editline]20th September 2015[/editline]
[QUOTE=TheBrokenHobo;48728878]i'm glad u specified this is the opposite of ur opinion because a lot of this is some of the silliest shit i've ever heard[/QUOTE]
You should of seen the lecture room when the professor was talking about it. Likes it's a lot more complicated than it being deconstructive, but if I were to explain everything I would just type my paper into facepunch. I just kind of worded it that way in my first post to make it seem humorous in an outrageous kind of way.
[QUOTE=splenda;48728874]Yea its a kind of weird paper. The professor even told us before the reading was assigned that "We would be outraged by the paper the first time we read it, but after reading it a few times you will start to understand what the author is saying."[/QUOTE]
it's possible to understand exactly what someone is saying but also think it's really silly
[QUOTE=TheBrokenHobo;48728893]it's possible to understand exactly what someone is saying but also think it's really silly[/QUOTE]
Yea and a bunch of people still think the paper is wrong. The beauty with academic papers is that they are usually just well researched opinions, and especially in this case, are not always right.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
