[QUOTE=BananaMed;34394131]Line is 1-dimensional,[/QUOTE]
Sorry, I didn't realize that all drawings had to be a straight line. Nothing of any deviation from that is allowed.
Have this drawing.
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a8/Coord_NumberLine.svg/200px-Coord_NumberLine.svg.png[/img]
[QUOTE=MountainWatcher;34394165]Regardless of where they came from, they're there.
And you can't consider lines to be 1-dimensional, otherwise you wouldn't be able to see them, and you sure as hell wouldn't be able to draw them.[/QUOTE]
That may be right about the lines. But If the background was considered as fields, drawings sensus stricte wouldn't exist
oh FaceBook people, you so silly
[IMG]http://i41.tinypic.com/eio84x.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Paramud;34394203]Sorry, I didn't realize that all drawings had to be a straight line. Nothing of any deviation from that is allowed.[/QUOTE]
Yes, I May have used the wrong term, even so, some sort of deviation is always welcome in art, that's what makes it go forward.
Edit: mergeee
[QUOTE=BananaMed;34394204]That may be right about the lines. But If the background was considered as fields, drawings sensus stricte wouldn't exist[/QUOTE]
I'm sorry, sensus stricte?
And dude, the guy meant mono-dimensional as in, in any referential tangential to it, there is no point contained in the y-axis.
[b][i]Life Ain't Nothing but Bitches and Money[/i][/b]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/xMR5l.png[/img]
[url]http://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/owlvg/life_aint_nothing_but_bitches_and_money/[/url]
[img]http://oi42.tinypic.com/eqdtgz.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=vladnag;34394228]oh FaceBook people, you so silly
[IMG]http://i41.tinypic.com/eio84x.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]
- Live life to the fullest, don't mind what other say
10 minutes later:
- Wow, she's a huge skank
"People have [B]no say in what others do[/B], so [B]back off[/B]"
Face-losophers are idiots.
[QUOTE=MountainWatcher;34394280]I'm sorry, sensus stricte?
And dude, the guy meant mono-dimensional as in, in any referential tangential to it, there is no point contained in the y-axis.[/QUOTE]
Unless you get a pencil that leaves a mark only one atom wide and tall, any type of line could be considered two dimensional.
[QUOTE=MountainWatcher;34394280]I'm sorry, sensus stricte?
And dude, the guy meant mono-dimensional as in, in any referential tangential to it, there is no point contained in the y-axis.[/QUOTE]
sensus stricte=literall meaning
Ah, I see, seemslike lack of sleep is catching up to me, on a side note:
The lines are were always considered 1-dimensional just like sheets of paper 2-dimensional, it's not really like this, but people always considered it that way.
[QUOTE=Corndog Ninja;34394320][IMG]http://i.crackedcdn.com/phpimages/photoshop/2/6/4/113264.jpg?v=1[/IMG][/QUOTE]
He had eyes though
[QUOTE=Paramud;34394359]Unless you get a pencil that leaves a mark only one atom wide and tall, any type of line could be considered two dimensional.[/QUOTE]
A atom still has non-zero dimmensions. It's literally impossible to mark a mono-dimensional line. (unless matter is continuous which I think physics assumes).
And yeah, he already corrected that.
[editline]25th January 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=BananaMed;34394375]sensus stricte=literall meaning
Ah, I see, seemslike lack of sleep is catching up to me, on a side note:
The lines are were always considered 1-dimensional just like sheets of paper 2-dimensional, it's not really like this, but people always considered it that way.[/QUOTE]
I'm not knowledgeable with art theory, can you explain why backgrounds can't be fields more clearly?
And okay, but wouldn't that make a drawing a merely theoretical thing? I think my point is, any drawing you make will be a painting (unless, except for the whole background field thing).
[QUOTE=MountainWatcher;34394389]
I'm not knowledgeable with art theory, can you explain why backgrounds can't be fields more clearly?
And okay, but wouldn't that make a drawing a merely theoretical thing? I think my point is, any drawing you make will be a painting (unless, except for the whole background field thing).[/QUOTE]
It is that way because you don't count the medium you are working on the REAL piece of art, it's the pencil, charcoal on it, the paint on canvas that is art, the medium just gives you the possibility to make it.
[QUOTE=BananaMed;34394493]It is that way because you don't count the medium you are working on the REAL piece of art, it's the pencil, charcoal on it, the paint on canvas that is art, the medium just gives you the possibility to make it.[/QUOTE]
I thought it was the final image. So, does that mean that if you paint something, then paint on top of it, it's not just the final layer, but both are considered the final art piece?
[QUOTE=EvilMelon;34392273][IMG]https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/396370_317769718266915_121188731258349_980122_1136901799_n.jpg[/IMG]
Sorry if late.[/QUOTE]
Hell even i can do that,
Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,
Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon,Kevin Bacon.
There you go.
[QUOTE=QuickSnapz;34394570]Who turned the reddit bot back on...[/QUOTE]
Overv
[QUOTE=MountainWatcher;34394534]I thought it was the final image. So, does that mean that if you paint something, then paint on top of it, it's not just the final layer, but both are considered the final art piece?[/QUOTE]
That's what I meant by it, it IS the final image. Concerning your question, the painting on top would be actually considered a paining, or a piece of art, because the basis of painting is to appeal to our sense of sight, thus making the earlier layers obsolete.
[QUOTE=BananaMed;34394605]That's what I meant by it, it IS the final image. Concerning your question, the painting on top would be actually considered a paining, or a piece of art, because the basis of painting is to appeal to our sense of sight, thus making the earlier layers obsolete.[/QUOTE]
But if the canvas shows, then how can it not be considered a field after all?
[QUOTE=reddit.com;34394536][b][i]daddy stormtrooper [fixed][/i][/b]
[t]http://i.imgur.com/lmLxZ.jpg[/t]
[url]http://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/owfvo/daddy_stormtrooper_fixed/[/url][/QUOTE]
Override! Post unfunny shit!
[QUOTE=MountainWatcher;34394629]But if the canvas shows, then how can it not be considered a field after all?[/QUOTE]
Because, that is genereally a bad thing to leave your canvas showing through the painting, even when you want to have the background white, you HAVE to paint if first white. Take this painting by Malevich:
[url]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6d/Malevich-Suprematism..jpg/504px-Malevich-Suprematism..jpg[/url]
Showing raw canvas is wastly taken as a mistake. Sometimes it can ruin a good painting(personal experience).
[b][i]The day is coming...[/i][/b]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/jrg62.png[/img]
[url]http://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/owcxa/the_day_is_coming/[/url]
[QUOTE=Sickle;34394636]Override! Post unfunny shit![/QUOTE]
Reddit Bot is the best robot ever and we all love him [img]http://i.somethingawful.com/forumsystem/emoticons/emot-roboluv.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=BananaMed;34394741]Because, that is genereally a bad thing to leave your canvas showing through the painting, even when you want to have the background white, you HAVE to paint if first white. Take this painting by Malevich:
[url]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6d/Malevich-Suprematism..jpg/504px-Malevich-Suprematism..jpg[/url]
Shoing raw canvas is wastly taken as a mistake. Sometimes it can ruin a good painting(personal experience).[/QUOTE]
Oh, but that isn't really a matter of color, it's still a field of color, just one with a shit texture.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
