• In your opinion, what are some ways Facepunch can be improved?
    80 replies, posted
add signatures
Be way harsher and quicker to ban. [editline]15th April 2013[/editline] and make me a mod
Make the site usable on a smartphone.
Bring in the dancing lobsters.
[QUOTE=D3TBS;40294175]add signatures[/QUOTE] We need clunky signatures laggy up the site, signature requests threads and rate my sig threads. Maybe a person who pays 100$ to the site should be able to get one. :v:
[QUOTE=Magmacow358;40283086]Increase the autoclose limit[/QUOTE] Lowering the limit made the forums go faster
Titles are pretty much the equivalent of signatures.
[QUOTE=MechaKat;40282648]Bring back the old ratings and emotes, such as spelling mistake and psy duck.[/QUOTE] I don't see Bad Spelling as a good rating. It was one of those things where people would instead of rating per content, would instead be a nitpick and rate Bad Spelling over a single spelling mistake in what was otherwise a perfect, amazing, or otherwise relatable post. Bad Reading on the otherhand, yes. It's a good rating. Now people use the box for that reason, but Bad Reading is a much less harsh and more polite way of letting the person know they misunderstood. I say bring back Bad Reading, and some of the core emotes.
Ban everyone. With nobody to post, there will be nobody to shitpost, nobody to make terrible threads, no pages to get banned for being king of. It'd be [I]entirely perfect.[/I]
[QUOTE=Rangergxi;40294570]We need clunky signatures laggy up the site, signature requests threads and rate my sig threads. Maybe a person who pays 100$ to the site should be able to get one. :v:[/QUOTE] You'd be surprised at how many people would actually do that. Too many people take this site way too seriously and would gladly invest their not so hard earned money into Facepunch.
The ability to browse, but not post, while banned.
Allow a user to view their own posts in the refugee camp.
[QUOTE=QUILTBAG;40295135]The ability to browse, but not post, while banned.[/QUOTE] But that would mean banned users had more access than non registered users and thats just silly
or you don't have to spend any money on anything, period.
[QUOTE=ASIC;40300902]Allow a user to view their own posts in the refugee camp.[/QUOTE] Here's a fix: Quit getting banned.
Bring back the "Bad Reading" rating.
make gold member more accessible again and give it to the people that were near the mark for gm back when it was still 2 years and 2000 posts. it's not gonna improve anything tbh but a lot of people got jipped out of gm because of the switch in requirements and i don't think that's fair.
make every person submit a picture of their ass on registration and if they get banned their ass becomes their avatar so we can all laugh at them [editline]16th April 2013[/editline] make them put a fedora on their back as they're bent over as well, so we can laugh at them even more
Smartness? I liked smartness.
Ban Glaber. 60% of SH's problems solved right there.
[QUOTE=jbthekid;40294710]You'd be surprised at how many people would actually do that. Too many people take this site way too seriously and would gladly invest their not so hard earned money into Facepunch.[/QUOTE] Well it would be a great indicator for finding the hardcore members of the community, bring the site revenue and give hardcore members signatures. I see no downsides.
The old, closed down forums that I heard about.
[QUOTE=Zally13;40311115]make every person submit a picture of their ass on registration and if they get banned their ass becomes their avatar so we can all laugh at them [editline]16th April 2013[/editline] make them put a fedora on their back as they're bent over as well, so we can laugh at them even more[/QUOTE] I wish I could post a reaction video without being banned, there's something that could be improved. Idk, reaction gifs would clog shit up, but they're really just necessary sometimes. I would post Tourrette's guy screaming "MEN'S ASSES!", but then I'd be banned. Bullshit. [editline]17th April 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Rangergxi;40311353]Well it would be a great indicator for finding the hardcore members of the community, bring the site revenue and give hardcore members signatures. I see no downsides.[/QUOTE] That's because you're a hardcore member. Some of us aren't on here all the time, no offense if you are, so it'd be kind of annoying to see a shit load of signatures everywhere. We already have titles, and ones that can be extremely long at that, to give people a sense of customization. Signatures would just expand the page even further.
Like stated somewhere in this thread 1. Blue members search 2. More emoticons / ratings 3. Demod max or atleast make him mod of sfm subforum and there only 4. Purge lmao pics 5. No huge fucking titles that the post takes up half the screen. 6. Sloth lord for fast threads mod
Make "Mentioned" posts lag at the bottom of the ticker for a bit like ratings do, so that people can reply to one another easier.
Talk to SA or something and bring back the emotes :q:
as it turns out, blues actually have a search function. or chrome is just really bro right now. ssssshhhh don't tell garry
Have a working FP browsing app.
[QUOTE=Vodkavia;40294659]Make the mods follow the rules they enforce and probably get rid of half of them as well.[/QUOTE] Can mods even be banned? [editline]18th April 2013[/editline] I would personally love to see a feature that shows how a post looked before it got edited/snipped.
Bring back the SA emotes Add more ratings and bring back the whole "Have a join date of four years and a thousand posts" criteria for gold but keep boostar as well
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.