[QUOTE=Greenen72;24849152]That's a terrible graph. It makes no sense. The line should start at 0,0 and go up-right. And you didn't label which axes were which.
Edit:
The way it looks now, when you have 0 characters, you play like utter shit.[/QUOTE]
This is how the graph works.
[IMG]http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/4749/graph1f.jpg[/IMG]
At the point on top left you have a lot of useless characters (number line Y) and skill at it's minimum (number line X). As the number of useless characters decrease, your skill increases. This chart works as it should and makes perfect sense. It doesn't take a fucking genius to guess which axes are which. Also if the line would start at 0,0
Which is here.
[IMG]http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/6633/graph2c.jpg[/IMG]
THEN it would mean that "when you have 0 characters, you play like utter shit." no matter which axe would be what.
I just can't figure out how did your thinking process go. You said it doesn't make any sense and should look your way, but it's your way that makes no sense and is the one you described in the first place.
You, and everyone who rated you "agree" should go back to school.
Oshit pageking
[IMG]http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/3154/69468023.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/9474/86472909.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/2716/89757797.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/4797/71757943.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Silly Sil;24857115]This is how the graph works.
[IMG_thumb]http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/4749/graph1f.jpg[/IMG_thumb]
[/QUOTE]
Now you've assigned both the X-axis and the Y-axis to Skill. The X is labeled skill, but the background denotes that Y is related to skill.
Nice work.
And content, just because.
[img]http://www.audacious-rants.com/files/2010/04/abstinencechart3.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=The_Naysayer;24857278]Now you've assigned both the X-axis and the Y-axis to Skill. The X is labeled skill, but the background denotes that Y is related to skill.
Nice work.
[/QUOTE]
X is skill. Y is number of characters. The line is the relation.
Nice work trying to sound smart and utterly failing because you don't know what you're talking about.
[QUOTE=Silly Sil;24857296]X is skill. Y is number of characters. The line is the relation.
Nice work trying to sound smart and utterly failing because you don't know what you're talking about.[/QUOTE]
I know how to read a graph, fella. The background you doodled tells a different story than the X-axis label.
No point in arguin'.
[img]http://thehostages.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/cropped-doggun.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=The_Naysayer;24857312]I know how to read a graph, fella. The background you doodled tells a different story than the X-axis label.
[/QUOTE]
Oh, well did you know that if I lower the skill the number of characters is going to increase?
Does that mean X is also Y because number of characters is dependant on skill?
Would that mean that both axises are Y and X at the same time? (it would to your logic)
Any change I make in any value on any axe is going to change the other value as well, because they are dependant on each other, as we're going to follow the line at all times. It doesn't mean X is Y or the other way around.
Edit.
Not gonna stretch this page anymore with my useless posts which you don't understand/care. Just please take some lessons and understand how it works before you try to sound smart next time.
[QUOTE=Silly Sil;24857337]Words.[/QUOTE]
Look, I don't like arguing, I'm just saying that what would otherwise be a redundantly labeled chart (if the background were striated to coincide with the x-axis) is instead just badly labeled.
It's really not that funny anyway. I've got this super awesome underscore in my name, and I'm *awful* at reaction time based videogames.
Onward to content. (and why I keep saying this is because arguing with you makes me nauseated. You should post something too, especially if you care to rattle on about this, even if it does end up raining clocks.
[img]http://adambalm.savetheocean.net/nfc2.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Silly Sil;24857337]graph etc.[/QUOTE]
The rainbow colours should be vertical if you see what I mean.
[CODE]Annoying kid | Rarely wins | etc.[/CODE]
instead of
[CODE]Annoying kid
-------------
Rarely wins
-------------
etc.[/CODE]
I think it's more logical.
[QUOTE=pedrus24;24857921]The rainbow colours should be vertical if you see what I mean.
[CODE]Annoying kid | Rarely wins | etc.[/CODE]instead of
[CODE]Annoying kid
-------------
Rarely wins
-------------
etc.[/CODE]I think it's more logical.[/QUOTE]
Yeah I agree but it would have to have switched axises too, otherwise it wouldn't have much sense (taking this from the implication the pic is making) . But the graphs can work this way too.
This is LMAO pics, not discuss graphs.
[QUOTE=pedrus24;24857921]The rainbow colours should be vertical if you see what I mean.
[CODE]Annoying kid | Rarely wins | etc.[/CODE]
instead of
[CODE]Annoying kid
-------------
Rarely wins
-------------
etc.[/CODE]
I think it's more logical.[/QUOTE]
But he's saying that the number of random characters in your name correlates to how good you are. :downs:
[QUOTE=Silly Sil;24858153]Yeah I agree but it would have to have switched axises too, otherwise it wouldn't have much sense (taking this from the implication the pic is making) . But the graphs can work this way too.[/QUOTE]
He just said exactly what I said... then you talk about changing axes... again... which would just recreate the issue your graph has originally...
Content's fun, too.
[img]http://www.boingboing.net/assets_c/2009/08/more-than-meets-the-eye-thumb-500x241-24471.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Rubs10;24858247]But he's saying that the number of random characters in your name correlates to how good you are. :downs:[/QUOTE]
That's the joke of the pic.
[QUOTE=The_Naysayer;24858255]He just said exactly what I said... then you talk about changing axes... again... which would just recreate the issue your graph has originally...
[/QUOTE]
That would say the skill doesn't depend on number of characters. And the purpose of this graph was to show that it does. As a joke. You missed it.
Or you didn't but you wanted to explain how wrong it is and how it should be changed to relate to reality.
Any other jokes you'd like to rationalize?
[QUOTE=Silly Sil;24858384]That would say the skill doesn't depend on number of characters. And the purpose of this graph was to show that it does. As a joke. You missed it.
Or you didn't but you wanted to explain how wrong it is and how it should be changed to relate to reality.
Any other jokes you'd like to rationalize?[/QUOTE]
Yes. I give up now. Shoot me in the face. You will hear no further argument from me on the matter, because I no longer care to argue the nonsense present in your graph's mechanics, let alone the content.
CONTENT. FOR THE GODDAMN VICTORY.
[img]http://www.headinjurytheater.com/images/comic%20retarded%20sperm%20jared%20hindman.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Silly Sil;24857115]This is how the graph works.
[IMG_thumb]http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/4749/graph1f.jpg[/IMG_thumb]
At the point on top left you have a lot of useless characters (number line Y) and skill at it's minimum (number line X). As the number of useless characters decrease, your skill increases. This chart works as it should and makes perfect sense. It doesn't take a fucking genius to guess which axes are which. Also if the line would start at 0,0
Which is here.
[IMG_thumb]http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/6633/graph2c.jpg[/IMG_thumb]
THEN it would mean that "when you have 0 characters, you play like utter shit." no matter which axe would be what.
I just can't figure out how did your thinking process go. You said it doesn't make any sense and should look your way, but it's your way that makes no sense and is the one you described in the first place.
You, and everyone who rated you "agree" should go back to school.
[/QUOTE]
In laymans terms, inverse proportion.
[img]http://trollcats.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/i_have_important_things_to_say_trollcat.jpg[/img]
This reminds me of a couple of my aunts. Our family reunions are noisy environments for many reasons, this being one of them.
[QUOTE=TippZ;24846338][IMG]http://joncomics.com/files/SPIDERMAN.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Spider man can impregnate women with buttsex. :psyduck:
And yes, I do know this is an extremely funny retarded comic.
EDIT:
Oh well... I guess nobody understands small humor here. :saddowns:
[QUOTE=Gvazdas;24859077]Spider man can give babies using buttsex.[/QUOTE]
:doh:
[QUOTE=Greenen72;24849152]That's a terrible graph. It makes no sense. The line should start at 0,0 and go up-right. And you didn't label which axes were which.
Edit:
The way it looks now, when you have 0 characters, you play like utter shit.[/QUOTE]
It doesn't need any label because everything is written on the graphic clear enough.
The higher the blueish bar is, the highest your character number is. If you can't understand that you are either a retard or someone who whine about everything.
Just see the useful explanation up there.