Unpopular Opinions V5: "I still don't like Half Life 2."
5,001 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Svinnik;49062703]Has that been a problem with FP users? I know reddit has that problem but I'd assume that after the first message, the mods would ban the creep/[/QUOTE]
I dont know about face punch.
I just assume how sexually frustrated people (America especially) are, tend to act weird.
it has been a problem before: see couragedog
[QUOTE=Anti Christ;49062794]it has been a problem before: see couragedog[/QUOTE]
what's the story with him?
Iced coffee > hot coffee
But I do admit that hot coffee smells infinitely better. There's so much variety in the aromas of italian, french, turkish, etc.
There should be no hate speech laws.
The fact that people used the Charlie Hebdo shooting to call for them is disgusting. "Limit what peaceful people say to stop violence assholes" is a stupid way of thinking.
[QUOTE=Rangergxi;49062855]There should be no hate speech laws.
The fact that people used the Charlie Hebdo shooting to call for them is disgusting. "Limit what peaceful people say to stop violence assholes" is a stupid way of thinking.[/QUOTE]
I think free speech was a sophisticated ploy by enlightenment politicians to get people to be quiet.
Violence tends to validate voices that if were otherwise ignored and allowed to exhaust themselves would have no effect.
Who is your avatar?
[QUOTE=Anti Christ;49062794]it has been a problem before: see couragedog[/QUOTE]
Link?
[QUOTE=proch;49062692]obviously i would think five times before thinking about taking a 'bed-happy' girl serious in a romantic sense.[/QUOTE]
why "obviously"? are we talking health issues here or are you implying a girl that likes sex is more likely to cheat
[QUOTE=Rangergxi;49062855]There should be no hate speech laws.
The fact that people used the Charlie Hebdo shooting to call for them is disgusting. "Limit what peaceful people say to stop violence assholes" is a stupid way of thinking.[/QUOTE]
Banning hate speech is fine so long as hate speech is properly defined.
For example speech specifically intended to incite violence such as: Hey we should totally go kill obama because he is black at 10:00 at the white house meetup at 9:00 in a cafe nearby. Don't forget to bring guns and explosives.
On that note if the NSA is reading this due to the wording I used pls forgibe me murica.
Banning hate speech is only problematic if you follow tumblrite definitions of hate speech.
[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;49063016]why "obviously"? are we talking health issues here or are you implying a girl that likes sex is more likely to cheat[/QUOTE]
Is it per se sexist to think its more likely that people that in the past have preferred having a large amount of partners are unlikely to suddenly settle down to just one? As long as that standard of distrust is applied to both men and women that is fair enough as it isn't entirely wrong. That being said people should be judged individually.
Nevermind, mixed up couragedog with Aspen.
[QUOTE=TAU!;49063063]Isn't couragedog the guy who made a really long creepy, sexual post about Autumn, and he described what he'd do to her? Then he attached a pic of his jizz on a picture of Autumn, I think.[/QUOTE]
nope, couragedog is a girl who got tons of messages
[URL="https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=994094"]https://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=994094[/URL]
[QUOTE=TAU!;49063063]Then he attached a pic of his jizz on a picture of Autumn, I think.[/QUOTE]
this was Aspen
[QUOTE=Murky42;49063048]Is it per se sexist to think its more likely that people that in the past have preferred having a large amount of partners are unlikely to suddenly settle down to just one? [B]As long as that standard of distrust is applied to both men and women[/B] that is fair enough as it isn't entirely wrong. That being said people should be judged individually.[/QUOTE]
except it almost never is
proch for example seems to think it's an almost entirely positive thing for men, but it's hard to trust women who have lots of sex
[QUOTE=proch;49062616]Long hair on boys is something they have to grow out of[/QUOTE]
Long haired guys are pretty attractive tbh especially if they let it go all tangled and dishevelled
So swoon worthy
[editline]6th November 2015[/editline]
Send me hot pics of your hair boys
[QUOTE=proch;49062616]Long hair on boys is something they have to grow out of[/QUOTE]
Why? Hair is hair. Hair shouldn't be made out to be anything childish, masculine, or feminine. Some hair styles do seem silly though, like having a big bun on top, or Leia's side buns.
I think it's bizzare that humans even grow hair at all.
I mean I know the answer to this already (it's because evolution and genetics) but sometimes I ask myself: "Why do we grow hair on our head and eyebrows and weird places?"
Yeah evolution what sort of wise idea was ass hair, hair on head protects our brain from cold sure that makes sense and same with hair in down stairs there but asshole, why?
[QUOTE=IJNOMED;49063383]I think it's bizzare that humans even grow hair at all.
I mean I know the answer to this already (it's because evolution and genetics) but sometimes I ask myself: "Why do we grow hair on our head and eyebrows and weird places?"[/QUOTE]
Hair on your head probably has to do with protecting it from UV rays, kinda like a sort of heat sink. The type of hair you have also helps out. As for eyebrows, what if it has to do with body language and facial expressions? Because eyebrows definitely do help to communicate facial expressions.
[editline]6th November 2015[/editline]
[QUOTE=Combine 177;49063430]Yeah evolution what sort of wise idea was ass hair, hair on head protects our brain from cold sure that makes sense and same with hair in down stairs there but asshole, why?[/QUOTE]
Hair on your ass prevents your ass cheeks from sticking together after you shit.
You could always wipe, yeah, but imagine having no ass hair, not wiping for days at a time, and then your ass cheeks just get crusted together because of being unhygienic.
[QUOTE=Combine 177;49063430]Yeah evolution what sort of wise idea was ass hair, hair on head protects our brain from cold sure that makes sense and same with hair in down stairs there but asshole, why?[/QUOTE]
Ass hair helps reduce ass cheeks rubbing on each other. Otherwise the movement from walking gives you terrible terrible friction burns.
Source: Will never shave it again.
[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;49063016]why "obviously"? are we talking health issues here or are you implying a girl that likes sex is more likely to cheat[/QUOTE]
Both
[QUOTE=Fetret;49063483]Ass hair helps reduce ass cheeks rubbing on each other. Otherwise the movement from walking gives you terrible terrible friction burns.
Source: Will never shave it again.[/QUOTE]
But if your ass cheeks doesn't even touch each other to begin with there is no downs?
I don't have much against Bernie Sanders (nothing personal at all but I do disagree with him on gun control), but his fanbase is getting about as disturbing as Ron Paul's.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;49064311]I don't have much against Bernie Sanders (nothing personal at all but I do disagree with him on gun control), but his fanbase is getting about as disturbing as Ron Paul's.[/QUOTE]
So people are enthusiastic about a person who can make a difference is something to be disturbed about?
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;49064311]I don't have much against Bernie Sanders (nothing personal at all but I do disagree with him on gun control), but his fanbase is getting about as disturbing as Ron Paul's.[/QUOTE]
I'm 99.9% sure that Ron Paul's 'fanbase' were supporting him for irony's sake. Much like Trump's fanbase.
A few of my friends want Trump to win the election and when I asked them why they all basically gave me the same answer. "We wanna see the SJWs, cucks, and libtards cry."
I legitimately wouldn't mind if they sat down, weighed all the facts and the candidates, and chose the one that best suited them in their own views, even if that meant their conclusion was Trump. That would be a completely fair vote, that's how democracy works. But no, this is some sort of joke to them. They want to vote for memes.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;49064311]I don't have much against Bernie Sanders (nothing personal at all but I do disagree with him on gun control), but his fanbase is getting about as disturbing as Ron Paul's.[/QUOTE]
Whats disturbing about Ron Pauls fanbase? They want to completely deregulate the economy but other than that they seem pretty chill.
[QUOTE=Rangergxi;49064575]Whats disturbing about Ron Pauls fanbase? They want to completely deregulate the economy but other than that they seem pretty chill.[/QUOTE]
Ron Paul is very against LGBT rights despite being a "libertarian". This is one of the many reasons why nobody takes him seriously, and why his 'fanbase' is supporting him no differently than Deez Nuts.
[QUOTE=Qaus;49064616]Ron Paul is very against LGBT rights despite being a "libertarian". This is one of the many reasons why nobody takes him seriously, and why his 'fanbase' is supporting him no differently than Deez Nuts.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]....When asked if he was supportive of gay marriage, Paul responded, "I am supportive of all voluntary associations and people can call it whatever they want."
...Paul had also said that at the federal level he opposed “efforts to redefine marriage as something other than a union between one man and one woman.” He believes that recognizing or legislating marriages should be left to the states and local communities,
...He has opposed the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would amend the US Constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman, because he worries that with its passage “liberal social engineers who wish to use federal government power to redefine marriage will be able to point to the constitutional marriage amendment as proof that the definition of marriage is indeed a federal matter![/QUOTE]
Yeah, States rights is his position. Lumping in candidates like Ron and Bernie with joke candidates like Deez nuts is just silly. They represent the views of quite a few people. The US government isn't doing enough for its poor, its in bed with corporate interests and its trampling on civil liberties. Quite a few people don't like this.
Bernie isn't a joke candidate and has a chance of winning. Ron Paul probably didn't have a chance since Republicans were too fearful of Obama and war hungry.
[QUOTE=Rangergxi;49064575]Whats disturbing about Ron Pauls fanbase? They want to completely deregulate the economy but other than that they seem pretty chill.[/QUOTE]
They were a complete cult of personality. Not to mention that he and Sanders both have a decent amount of people who only supported them because they wanted to smoke pot. At least Sanders has outright said he hates that faction of his supporters though.
Also I think the whole "deliberately try to destroy the world's economy" thing Paul had going was kind of a big deal. I like Sanders, I'm voting for him, but Paul was a bigger joke than Trump and Deez combined.
I don't think there should be a president at all. Placing executive power over a country with 350 million citizens into the hands of a single person is far beyond reasonable.
[QUOTE=Sector 7;49064895]I don't think there should be a president at all. Placing executive power over a country with 350 million citizens into the hands of a single person is far beyond reasonable.[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://imgur.com/b1akvnq.jpeg[/IMG]
sorry, couldn't resist
Isn't president just a flesh puppet for government, it is just the face for the whole thing.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.