• Unpopular Opinions V5: "I still don't like Half Life 2."
    5,001 replies, posted
[QUOTE=IJNOMED;49408289]Girl: Boob and not peen Boy: Peen and ball dangles Only sexes. You are one or the other. You can't be both that's a disease. Love who you want and if you feel like you are male or female that is A OK with me.[/QUOTE] what about people who are born with both sets of genitalia its a medical condition of course but you are by your definitions both sexes
[QUOTE=Levithan;49406543]transformer is the best gender[/QUOTE] Transcendentalism is best, you get loaded up on drugs (better drugs than hormones) and write shit
The story lines of Call of Duty: World at War are horrifically cringey and pretty much ruin the game for me. The pacific campaign is the main offender in this. I could barely get through the first two missions because it would be clumsy set pieces followed by patriotic horn music with pretty much zero self-awareness.
Knights of the Old Republic 2 is the greatest RPG ever made.
Half-Life: Blue Shift is way better than Opposing Force.
[QUOTE=Rudevinny;49410041]What is the difference between those two? They're both just long elongated strips of fried potatoes.[/QUOTE] Chips are thick and soft, fries are thin and crispy. [editline]29th December 2015[/editline] That's what people I know say, I just call them chips either way.
[QUOTE=Rudevinny;49410041]What is the difference between those two? They're both just long elongated strips of fried potatoes.[/QUOTE] They both look boring. I'm fried out, man. Too many fries. Fries everywhere. Fries with burgers. Fries with steaks. Can we get another side, please? I'm tired with the default safeness of fries.
Steak fries best fries
[QUOTE=Lonestriper;49409160]The story lines of Call of Duty: World at War are horrifically cringey and pretty much ruin the game for me. The pacific campaign is the main offender in this. I could barely get through the first two missions because it would be clumsy set pieces followed by patriotic horn music with pretty much zero self-awareness.[/QUOTE] This is supposed to be the 'unpopular opinions' thread lmao. The above is hardly an unpopular opinion. My unpopular opinion, at least here on Facepunch, is that as a male, I believe the world would have been a better place if females were instead the historically dominant sex.
of all the things I've ever posted in this thread I expect the most backlash from this I don't like steak
[QUOTE=Mr. Zombie;49410675]Steak fries best fries[/QUOTE] I want a genocide on all non-curly fries. Curly fries the perfect master race of fries.
[QUOTE=Antdawg;49410737]My unpopular opinion, at least here on Facepunch, is that as a male, I believe the world would have been a better place if females were instead the historically dominant sex.[/QUOTE] the few women who historically rose into large-scale leadership roles were usually incredibly vicious
[QUOTE=Yahnich;49410843]literally the only thing that would change is that instead of women men would have slightly shittier lives[/QUOTE] I get what you're saying, but I doubt it would be just some palette swap. The entire structure and events of human histories and entire cultures could be completely different if roles were swapped. I think the world would be so different it'd bear way less resemblance to our own. In fact, I'd argue that it'd be so different it's impossible to say what a world with a historical woman dominance would be like. Saying it would be better or worse I think is moot because you don't know what it would even be in the first place.
[QUOTE=Mister Sandman;49410839]of all the things I've ever posted in this thread I expect the most backlash from this I don't like steak[/QUOTE] Well you'd be right. The worst opinion in the thread :class:
I believie that oily muscles, steaks, big guns, video games, sports and bbq are awesome FUCK YEAH
[QUOTE=proch;49411144]I believie that oily muscles, steaks, big guns, video games, sports and bbq are awesome FUCK YEAH[/QUOTE] Well I mean most of these things are so I guess they overshadow the others
If women were the dominant gender I would suspect there would be more war. Men would still be the better warmachines due to physical differences. Of course with more technology the advantages of increased physical performance become smaller. How much you can benchpress is irrelevant while flying a drone. However I'm thinking in broad lines and not really containing myself to a specific time and place. Assuming a democratic system women would hold more power in it due to resource accumulation however they wouldn't have to be very concerned about being sent to war. This would make cultivating wars easier as its much easier to send others to die for your cause then to die for the cause yourself. Women are considerably more religious on average then men: [url]https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-secular-life/201409/why-are-women-more-religious-men[/url] (Although the ratios might change more depending on what the true cause is behind being more religious as the article states.) While IMO the importance of religion as driving force behind the start of warfare is often overstated: (fun fact between 2006 and 2009 in syria total crop failure was nearly 75% and herders in the northeast lost 85% of their livestock). That being said its undeniably a potent force for stirring up hatred and demanding wars and other blights. Men and women network differently from each other and with women being the dominant powerbase that would probably make the worlds overall culture and business very different from today. Women typically put more emphasis on close ties while men have a lot of loose contacts they can call on when they need something. This would probably cause some of the biggest changes you would see in the world if women were dominant as this effects almost every level of society. To be able to even come close to being able to imagine the full effects this would have you need to read the source. [url]http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/risk/library/WP2009_MS.pdf[/url] Back to the theme of there being more war due to the difference in networking you will see more smaller factions/countries/businesses. With more smaller groups with closer relationships you increase the likelihood of getting the domino effect when a war starts which would increase the chances of world wars. Due to smaller factions you also get more total in-group biases. When people disagree very hard too often people pick up their sword or demand that person to be socially ostracized. Naturally there would also be benefits to women being the dominant gender across the board however I am a pessimist so I am not nearly as good as imagining those. Worth noting that while the above may sound like a described doomsday scenario its not. Women aren't stupid and for the most part wouldn't forgo good business and those that do would fall out of the ratrace. The average would move to a certain degree though.
I don't really wanna get too in to that.
[QUOTE=Antdawg;49410737] My unpopular opinion, at least here on Facepunch, is that as a male, I believe the world would have been a better place if females were instead the historically dominant sex.[/QUOTE] Hilary Clinton, Michelle Bachman, Sarah Palin... I must say, female leaders are just as awful as male ones.
OS X is a type of PC The "Mac vs PC" ads were very successful at making most people believe that Apple computers are somehow unique from personal computers.
[QUOTE=Daniel Smith;49411517]OS X is a type of PC The "Mac vs PC" ads were very successful at making most people believe that Apple computers are somehow unique from personal computers.[/QUOTE] And people still insist that Windows = PC [editline]29th December 2015[/editline] Not really an opinion, PC literally stands for Personal Computer, which a computer manufactured by apple i.e. a Macintosh line computer, a computer running Windows, a computer running Linux or any other OS really is.
It's as if there was a commercial about pepsi and coca cola and it's called "pepsi vs soft drink"
Women can be just as 'piggish' towards men as men can be towards women, and a lot of us can do it with way less shame I reckon because it's not seen as socially unacceptable. A disturbing amount of ladies I've seen have seemingly no trouble with feeling up guys without being invited to, guys they haven't even met, and are extremely unashamed about voicing their thirstiness. Before anyone says it, no I'm not saying guys don't feel up girls or say gross shit while seemingly unaware of how creepy they're being, I'm saying that girls do the same thing but there seems to be a complete lack of any societal backlash for the behavior. This is a little more of an extreme example but [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3_4rMqX_zY[/media] this kind of shit
[QUOTE=Daniel Smith;49411549]It's as if there was a commercial about pepsi and coca cola and it's called "pepsi vs soft drink"[/QUOTE] It would actually be more like saying "Pepsi VS cola"
[QUOTE=Mister Sandman;49411625]Women can be just as 'piggish' towards men as men can be towards women, and a lot of us can do it with way less shame I reckon because it's not seen as socially unacceptable. A disturbing amount of ladies I've seen have seemingly no trouble with feeling up guys without being invited to, guys they haven't even met, and are extremely unashamed about voicing their thirstiness. Before anyone says it, no I'm not saying guys don't feel up girls or say gross shit while seemingly unaware of how creepy they're being, I'm saying that girls do the same thing but there seems to be a complete lack of any societal backlash for the behavior. This is a little more of an extreme example but this kind of shit[/QUOTE] Don't know if this counts but in high school a girl asked me if I wanted to take a shit in her mouth and I felt really uncomfortable, even if it was just a joke. I bet that if our genders were reversed they would have been suspended for a very long time.
[QUOTE=gokiyono;49411682]It would actually be more like saying "Pepsi VS cola"[/QUOTE] Those ads were explicitly about Mac and Windows though
[QUOTE=proch;49411872]Those ads were explicitly about Mac and Windows though[/QUOTE] Yeah but they always stated with "Hi. I'm a Mac, and I'm a PC" Same with comparing Pepsi and Cola. You're comparing a brand to the thing the brand (usually) is.
Blockade3D is probably one of the best free to play shooters on steam. It even matches closely with TF2.
[QUOTE=Mister Sandman;49410839]of all the things I've ever posted in this thread I expect the most backlash from this I don't like steak[/QUOTE] i once ate 8 pounds of steak at once you are scum to me
Steak's good, but it's super overrated.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.