why diablo III was delayed? - General

Too much graphics, too much graphics everythere.

For every graphic they loose, 2 take it's place. In other words: Too much graphics.

Waaay to much graphics.

To be honest I'm glad it had [b]too[/b] much graphics. The graphics in it were going to be too much.

So I have time to finish Diablo and Diablo 2.

[QUOTE=Fosty99;23896635]So I have time to finish Diablo and Diablo 2.[/QUOTE] Luckily Diablo 1 & 2 had just enough graphics.

[QUOTE=autodesknoob;23875109]ok it was funny the first time, but really,[b] is that because blizzard doesnt have enough money or what?[/b][/QUOTE] i hope your joking.

[QUOTE=Source;23896689]i hope your joking.[/QUOTE] if you could read well, you might know i was giving an example

The graphics were in exess

They had a too high amount of graphics.

I believe there's too much graphics.

Anyways for a serious answer: Blizzard probably needs more time to develop and, especially, polish the game. Not to mention since they are already releasing HotS in 8-12 months they don't want to cannibalize their own sales (AKA compete with themselves).

[QUOTE=acds;23898400]Anyways for a serious answer: Blizzard probably needs more time to develop and, especially, polish the game. Not to mention since they are already releasing HotS in 8-12 months they don't want to cannibalize their own sales (AKA compete with themselves).[/QUOTE] Nah, I think there is too much graphics.

You must construct additional graphics.

is anyone going to give a serious answer?

[QUOTE=autodesknoob;23902958]is anyone going to give a serious answer?[/QUOTE] Diablo III wasn't delayed I don't understand why everyone thinks this. There has been no set date or anything from anything I've heard. The game wasn't even close to done in 09 and had a ton of work. Half the spells didn't work when I played. They are still working on it. It's not delayed. I expect it to be late 2011 for it come out.

[QUOTE=autodesknoob;23902958]is anyone going to give a serious answer?[/QUOTE] Blizzard has too much serious.

The level of rendered polygons, vertexes and vectors where in a high amount. Much to high above planned.

[QUOTE=autodesknoob;23875109]ok it was funny the first time, but really, is that because blizzard doesnt have enough money or what?[/QUOTE] Blizzard.. not enough money? Everything they make is gold. They own World of Warcraft. That alone generates like 12,000,000 x $15, per month. That's not even including microtransactions.

Also; [img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100421115744/callofduty/images/thumb/a/a1/TrollFace-1-.png/200px-TrollFace-1-.png[/img]

Oh my god I laughed so hard at the first post. Bravo.

I know a guy at blizzard and he says it was too much graphics.

Too much graphics? I'm thinking the more reasonable answer is not enough gameplay.

[QUOTE=Murdoco;23904876]Diablo III wasn't delayed I don't understand why everyone thinks this. There has been no set date or anything from anything I've heard. The game wasn't even close to done in 09 and had a ton of work. Half the spells didn't work when I played. They are still working on it. It's not delayed. I expect it to be late 2011 for it come out.[/QUOTE] thanks! finally some serious answers

[QUOTE=autodesknoob;23938542]thanks! finally some serious answers[/QUOTE] He's lying though. It was delayed, reason being too much graphics.

They have to divide the graphics by zero. Oh wait....