• The Catgirl Megathread V.1: Probably the only thread about Catgirls to ever be made.
    9,701 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Hammer7;38676911][IMG]http://horobox.co.uk/u/hammer7fall_1354483369.gif[/IMG][/QUOTE] Thank you
[QUOTE=chunkymonkey;38678048]Your gifs play too fast once they load.[/QUOTE] This one is just fast.
Hime cut is cute.
[QUOTE=chunkymonkey;38678048]Your gifs play too fast once they load.[/QUOTE] I think it's a problem with your browser They seem fine for me in Opera/FF
Same thing happens to me. Using Chrome.
[QUOTE=Toyhobo;38678025]Maybe he was hoping of meeting one and get one as a GF.[/QUOTE] as a sort of pet-companion I suppose
[QUOTE=JgcxCub;38679884]as a sort of pet-companion I suppose[/QUOTE] Yeah, don't you watch TV? Catgirls crash into people's houses all the time.
[T]http://i4.minus.com/iboyMLZud6LjMC.jpg[/T][T]http://i2.minus.com/iDXAujog3ld6d.jpg[/T][T]http://i6.minus.com/ithkVeaZoxKwc.jpg[/T] [T]http://i6.minus.com/i9IvUzlIQ0Fdq.jpg[/T][T]http://i1.minus.com/ibgdjFEdO3QQFP.jpg[/T][T]http://i5.minus.com/iYEFrjpft6tHF.jpg[/T] [T]http://i4.minus.com/ibqSu0bBWKAY4D.jpg[/T] Okay so this isn't a catgirl but how the hell did i make such a large gif with such a small filesize? [IMG]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/45561413/gifs/Anime/KirinoLips.gif[/IMG] [sp]Although this does relate to how some people view this thread...[/sp]
it's because only the mouth updates new information, instead of the entire image. Also the color table is well optimized, you can see it's using large blocks of color instead of smooth gradients, much like a really low quality JPG. Saves all that extra data
[QUOTE=Call Me Kiwi;38679971]how the hell did i make such a large gif with such a small filesize?[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=daijitsu;38680051]it's because only the mouth updates new information, instead of the entire image. Also the color table is well optimized, you can see it's using large blocks of color instead of smooth gradients, much like a really low quality JPG. Saves all that extra data[/QUOTE] Just to expand on this because I can, gif is a lossless format which works by optimization of the colour pallet and differences between frames, even though it appears to work like a lossy format like jpg it isn't technically (it's strange but blame old tech for it). By restricting and blending the colour pallet to be smaller it reduces the filesize, the less movement an image has also reduces the filesize as the format can get away sharing data from one frame to another, you can then also reduce the size even more by using dither techniques like noise which will blend the limited pallet so it appears the detail isn't lost (when visually it is, kinda). TL;DR: Images.
frame-data-sharing can be a bitch though [img]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/10572953/gif/happppegin.gif[/img]
Thank you kiwi please keep them coming
[QUOTE=daijitsu;38680301]frame-data-sharing can be a bitch though [img]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/10572953/gif/happppegin.gif[/img][/QUOTE] That wouldn't be half as neat if it weren't so screwed up.
[QUOTE=FlubberNugget;38679529]I think it's a problem with your browser They seem fine for me in Opera/FF[/QUOTE] It's not really a "problem" per se. It's how each browser determines the speed at which frames are played. I can tell he tested it specifically in FF since it plays slow as shit in IE and faster in Chrome. I'd made a shit load of gifs back in the day and they all play at the correct speed in FF but when played in Chrome they are slightly faster. I'd wager he makes them in Photoshop.
I won. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/NLYm8.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.minus.com/iG62TcjgtMAuv.png[/IMG]
No. [IMG]http://horobox.co.uk/u/hammer7fall_1354535786.gif[/IMG]
[QUOTE=daijitsu;38680301]frame-data-sharing can be a bitch though [img]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/10572953/gif/happppegin.gif[/img][/QUOTE] Yeah it rarely ever works with transparency. :v:
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/QOqmC.jpg[/IMG]
i think we need more cargrills in boxes
[QUOTE=Hammer7;38680585]No. [IMG]http://horobox.co.uk/u/hammer7fall_1354535786.gif[/IMG][/QUOTE] I constantly get a bad case of the giggles at that part.
[QUOTE=Qubik;38680643]i think we need more cargrills in boxes[/QUOTE] Okay. [IMG]http://horobox.co.uk/u/hammer7fall_1354558897.gif[/IMG]
ur silly thats not a box thats a kotatsu
[QUOTE=Sir Whoopsalot;38680668]I constantly get a bad case of the giggles at that part.[/QUOTE] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCD6S3cQOJg[/media]
[QUOTE=chunkymonkey;38680499]It's not really a "problem" per se. It's how each browser determines the speed at which frames are played. I can tell he tested it specifically in FF since it plays slow as shit in IE and faster in Chrome. I'd made a shit load of gifs back in the day and they all play at the correct speed in FF but when played in Chrome they are slightly faster. I'd wager he makes them in Photoshop.[/QUOTE] But you just explained exactly why it is a problem They play faster than they should
So I herd u liek big pictarz... [IMG]http://horobox.co.uk/u/hammer7fall_1354562297.gif[/IMG]
Not that big, but it is animated. 8.5/10
[img]http://horobox.reager.org/u/NintendoGuy_1354566270.jpg[/img] [img]http://horobox.reager.org/u/NintendoGuy_1354570541.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=FlubberNugget;38680908]But you just explained exactly why it is a problem They play faster than they should[/QUOTE] It's how they're made that's the problem.
[QUOTE=chunkymonkey;38681075]It's how they're made that's the problem.[/QUOTE] Hmm, fair enough But almost all gifs seem faster in chrome This just brings me back to the previous argument
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.