• Fast Anime
    5,006 replies, posted
for that one guy who likes devilman [url=http://moca-news.net/article/20150416/2015041616080a_/01/]new devilman animu being made[/url] It comes out in Autumn and is by Studio Actas, who did such Nagai-derived shows as Kotetsushin Jeeg, Mazinkaiser SKL, and Girls und Panzer.
[QUOTE=Cuon Alpinus;47537906]I'm sorry, but they could at least put forth the effort to not directly connect the nose to the chin. Human's don't have muzzles.[/QUOTE] Makes me miss Fate/Zero's grizzled men with actual faces with detail instead of blank slates. I'm glad I'm not the only one who finds the character designs in the new Fate dull.
[QUOTE=Reds;47537933]for that one guy who likes devilman [URL="http://moca-news.net/article/20150416/2015041616080a_/01/"]new devilman animu being made[/URL] It comes out in Autumn and is by Studio Actas, who did such Nagai-derived shows as Kotetsushin Jeeg, Mazinkaiser SKL, and Girls und Panzer.[/QUOTE] OHMYGODOHMYGODOHGOD YES now here's to hope it follows the mango honestly I haven't been this excited for an anime since Gintama's announcement
[QUOTE=Cuon Alpinus;47537906]I'm sorry, but they could at least put forth the effort to not directly connect the nose to the chin. Human's don't have muzzles.[/QUOTE] That's part of the style a lot of the time extreme simplification of the shapes
[QUOTE=Reds;47537933]for that one guy who likes devilman [url=http://moca-news.net/article/20150416/2015041616080a_/01/]new devilman animu being made[/url] It comes out in Autumn and is by Studio Actas, who did such Nagai-derived shows as Kotetsushin Jeeg, Mazinkaiser SKL, and Girls und Panzer.[/QUOTE] Hopefully they follow the manga story Cause I need to see that ending animated
I'm still waiting for my full adaptation of Blazing Transfer Student.
[QUOTE=Eric95;47538449]That's part of the style a lot of the time extreme simplification of the shapes[/QUOTE] Yes the style of laziness so it's easier to draw
Oh look, Rie Kugimiya showed up in Kekkai Sensen. At least the music is still amazing.
[QUOTE=dgg;47538517]Yes the style of laziness so it's easier to draw[/QUOTE] usually it's done for appeal generally less details = more appeal that's why anime characters have dots for noses
I agree. If my waifu had a nose. I'd dump her.
[QUOTE=Eric95;47538734]usually it's done for appeal generally less details = more appeal that's why anime characters have dots for noses[/QUOTE] So Japan thinks lemmings are appealing
Hestia is such a friggin airhead. I couldn't help but be annoyed at the end. But I still love her. Stupid airhead anime characters and their charmes :suicide:
[QUOTE=dgg;47538517]Yes the style of laziness so it's easier to draw[/QUOTE] why do you have this crazy misguided idea that ufotable is somehow a lazy studio when they seem to put at least twice as much effort into their shows then other studios. they're one of the few studios where the BD release doesn't look different at all from the tv airing version because there was [I]nothing to fix[/I] First you say "it's fake good animation because gradients" now you call them lazy, what's your grudge against Ufotable? A deliberate style to make the animation closer to the style of the Visual Novel is not fucking lazyness, this is what the characters have always looked like in side views. If anything you should blame Takeuchi for having ridiculous sameface in type-moon's VNs.
With the amount of budget in Fate/Stay Night it should be pretty damn obvious that the fact that it looks garbage from the side is just the result of the original art style and not laziness of the animators. The art style looks like that because it's a pretty boring 2004 art style. The time it came out was maximum boring and maximum muzzleface. They're just replicating it.
You guys are good at holding grudges. At no point have I ever called Ufotable bad or lazy animators, I have only said that I don't think they are [I]as good[/I] at animating as they might first seem, this was in a discussion about what company out there was the best at animation. I think Ufotable is a good quality animation studio and I have stated so earlier, so fucking stop it. Neither me nor Akuma mentioned Ufotable, we were criticizing the style, whether that is Ufotable or Takeuchi's fault, who gives a fuck? The style is bad, they are lemmings from the side. We were criticizing the style, you're the ones making into some rant about how bad Ufotable is. Ufotable also holds all rights in the world to change the style to look more appealing if they want, don't hold the source material victim here, it was a conscious decision to keep the style, and I don't think it looks good. Ufotable also draws horribly weird faces whenever anyone is at a slight distance away from the camera, even when they aren't even animated. Don't come here with that "Nothing needed to be changed" crap, that to me sounds like a very defensive fanboyish thing to say, both UBW works have lots of wonky looking characters on panned keyframes. They produce good quality animation, no doubt, but no work is without flaws no matter how good and just even saying that is to me a sign of ignorance.
[QUOTE=dgg;47539151]You guys are good at holding grudges. [/QUOTE] People continuing to disagree with you over Ufotable's animation is not a grudge. Way to portray yourself as a poor persecuted victim for expressing your opinion and everybody is being unreasonable and quick to rush to oppose you. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Stop arguing with eachother" - Orkel))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=dgg;47539151].[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Reds;47539260].[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=dgg;47539151].[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Reds;47539260].[/QUOTE] uh oh
[QUOTE=Reds;47539260]People continuing to disagree with you over Ufotable's animation is not a grudge. Way to portray yourself as a poor persecuted victim for expressing your opinion and everybody is being unreasonable and quick to rush to oppose you.[/QUOTE] It is a grudge because you're (rakh) bringing irrelevant points to the table that has nothing to do with the discussion
[QUOTE=dgg;47539311]It is a grudge because you're (rakh) bringing irrelevant points to the table that has nothing to do with the discussion[/QUOTE] I don't see how you talking about the character designs in one of ufotable's anime negatively is unrelated to my mostly joking statement that you seem to have a grudge against them, based on past things you have said. I don't actually think you have a grudge against them, nor do I have a grudge against you. Had anyone else said these things I would have replied in the same manner.
[QUOTE=Rahkshi lord;47539336]I don't see how you talking about the character designs in one of ufotable's anime negatively is unrelated to my mostly joking statement that you seem to have a grudge against them, based on past things you have said. I don't actually think you have a grudge against them, nor do I have a grudge against you. Had anyone else said these things I would have replied in the same manner.[/QUOTE] Yes, had anyone else said anything about the style of Ufotable you would have surely went out of your way to claim things that they've never said. (I've never called Ufotable lazy) You would have brought up their past arguments on a different topic, out of context, to make them look dumb and following it up with a claim that isn't even true to make it seem even dumber. You're not arguing or bringing up points related to the style before the end of your post, you're going out of your way to make me look stupid for even saying anything negative about the style, bringing up things I've said before that have no relevance and claiming that I've said things that I haven't.
[QUOTE=dgg;47539151]You guys are good at holding grudges. At no point have I ever called Ufotable bad or lazy animators, I have only said that I don't think they are [I]as good[/I] at animating as they might first seem, .[/QUOTE] So you called them lazy, but you didn't mean that they were lazy because calling them lazy there is different from calling them lazy here. You called their animation artificially more detailed via gradients and shaders and filters and whatnot rather than putting more effort in via more base details on the drawings. soooooo lazy then
[QUOTE=Reds;47539392]So you called them lazy, but you didn't mean that they were lazy because calling them lazy there is different from calling them lazy here. You called their animation artificially more detailed via gradients and shaders and filters and whatnot rather than putting more effort in via more base details on the drawings. soooooo lazy then[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=dgg;47538517]Yes the [B]style [/B]of laziness so it's easier to draw[/QUOTE] I called the [B]style[/B] lazy. I said their animation looks better because of their post-processing. That's not laziness at all, that's making your work look better. Other companies animate better than Ufotable, I never called their animation bad, just not the best.
[QUOTE=dgg;47539377]Yes, had anyone else said anything about the style of Ufotable you would have surely went out of your way to claim things that they've never said. (I've never called Ufotable lazy) You would have brought up their past arguments out of context to make them look dumb following up with another claim to make them look dumb that they've never even said.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=dgg;47538517]Yes the style of laziness so it's easier to draw[/QUOTE] Sorry I misinterpreted this as you calling the studio lazy, there's [I]absolutely[/I] no way anybody would ever misunderstand this post made by somebody who said "ufotable's animation isn't as good as everybody thinks it's just gradients." I mean, it's not like anybody has ever misunderstood one of your posts in the past, right?
[QUOTE=Rahkshi lord;47539405]Sorry I misinterpreted this as you calling the studio lazy, there's [I]absolutely[/I] no way anybody would ever misunderstand this post made by somebody who said "ufotable's animation isn't as good as everybody thinks it's just gradients." I mean, it's not like anybody has ever misunderstood one of your posts in the past, right?[/QUOTE] "I've misunderstood you before so it's not my problem that I misunderstood what's clearly stated and instead thinking you were talking about something you never even said in your post" I criticized the style, whoever is responsible for the style is the ones I'm criticizing.
[QUOTE=dgg;47539411]"I've misunderstood you before so it's not my problem that I misunderstood what's clearly stated and instead thinking you were talking about something you never even said in your post"[/QUOTE] I said "anybody", not "I", as in multiple people (most of them from what I remember) seem to find your posts hard to understand. Because you're not nearly as clear as you think you're being dgg; perhaps after years of people not understanding your arguments you should step back and think about whether everybody else is an idiot, or that it might actually be your posts being unclear.
[QUOTE=Rahkshi lord;47539436]I said "anybody", not "I", as in multiple people (most of them from what I remember) seem to find your posts hard to understand. Because you're not nearly as clear as you think you're being dgg; perhaps after years of people not understanding your arguments you should step back and think about whether everybody else is an idiot, or that it might actually be your posts being unclear.[/QUOTE] Believe me, there is literally no day that goes by without me thinking about how I can keep myself shorter and more to the point, (it's mentally breaking me down bit by bit) and keep more clarity in my posts. If we dumb down the thought process, this has been the case since elementary school since I've always gotten feedback that I am too heavy handed in my formulations. I am. But I can't stop explaining myself and trying to make everything as correct and precise as possible, causing a lot of extra words and thoughts. This makes my posts so long that people can't be arsed and either don't bother, fill in the blanks or end up missunderstanding as they get lost in a jungle of words. I'm ok with people missunderstanding my first post if it's a long one or I can see that I didn't really get my point across properly or used a word or formulation that could be interpreted two ways. However, when I force-feed people what I [I]actually tried to say[/I] and people actively go out of their way to ignore that and bring up my first post where I wrote it wrong, that's when I lose my shit. You all are like "but you said this!" "Now you're just backpedaling" "You're just trying to cover your ass" when all I'm fucking doing is correcting myself and trying to make you understand what I meant to say in the first place. This kind of clarification is admittal of wrongdoing, of a bad sentence, of saying something wrong. But you guys always want to make it out into me just being wrong and can't accept a clarification and correction, you just make it into me "not admitting fault" when that is in itself admitting fault. It's also extremely terrible when people admit to not reading what I've written and then make claims that are shot down by what I wrote. It's especially popular to claim that I have a certain opinion on something even though I've said otherwise time and time again. Also, the very main reason I can't ever let go of my victimization here, beyond having people bring up irrelevant past points to try and make me look like a fool is this: I once made a statement about a show or whatever, and I was showered in disagrees. Orkel says the [B]exact same thing, word for word[/B] and gets showered in agrees. This blatant personal discrimination on a person and not the words being said has and will forever haunt me and keep supporting my idea of being if not completely, at least partially right when it comes to the victimization and discrimination in this thread. The way I'm personally experiencing it, you're more interested in making me look wrong than actually arguing. As much as I like a good quarrel every now and again, I actively try to discuss peoples words, not who they are or what they've said before, my focus is on what they are trying to say. To make an [I]extreme[/I] example to clarify what I mean by that: if someone has an opinion that all homosexuals need to go to hell and should be shot at sight, I still wouldn't hold this opinion against the person in any other conversation than homosexuals, I wouldn't think less of the person in discussion or ever try to bring it up when it's not during a conversation about homosexuals. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Stop arguing with eachother" - Orkel))[/highlight]
Do you guys hear something? Something that sounds like a really long petty argument that's ultimately going to go nowhere and frustrate everybody from a man who has finally broken and gone insane? I could have sworn I can hear something like that. oh well, i'm sure it's nothing important So I finished XXXholic. Season 2's shorter but more plot focused structure made it really good, the first season was nearly all self-contained episodes and the series as a whole got a lot more interesting as it went along. Pretty good/10.
Wonder if the next episode of Punchline! will be as wacky as the first. [highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("alt of perma'd user JohnFisher89" - Orkel))[/highlight]
So it looks like Ninja Slayer is Inferno Cop: Saturation Edition. [t]http://i.imgur.com/e4x910G.jpg[/t]
why do so many jjba fanart pics miss the point of the show's artstyle? it's all generic anime or that bl artstyle
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.