OP is a Chelsea supporter. That explains his stupidity.
if your not going to take this seriosly...
[QUOTE=frost13s;25388001]if your not going to take this seriosly...[/QUOTE]
Ok so no more jokes then, London might actually be nuked tomorrow.
this is seriosly
fallout 5 anyone?
lets just say, if london got bombed......
the world will be happy, because threads like this makes people pissed at london :3:
[QUOTE=eninco;25391173]lets just say, if london got bombed......
the world will be happy, because threads like this makes people pissed at london :3:[/QUOTE]
im not even in london
Yeah if anybody was going to nuke anybody it would be Israel nuking like Iran or something but even that would be unlikely because they are very close and Israel would hurt themselves also.
wouldnt isreal nuking iran mean that everyone else in the world will want to nuke
[QUOTE=frost13s;25392408]wouldnt isreal nuking iran mean that everyone else in the world will want to nuke[/QUOTE]
Words cannot describe how stupid you are.
This thread has made me wonder how someone can be so stupid. (I mean really, how can you not have learned about M.A.D?)
[QUOTE=Soul-Chicken;25380875]Uhm why would anyone Nuke London?
Did it insult someone?[/QUOTE]
[img]http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/images/2009/04/14/15team1650.jpg[/img]
Great leader demands it. He finds democracy disgusting.
Just gonna put this out there: Could our young friend here be trolling? If he is not and is just imbecilic then here is an explanation on how a nuclear war would work. Lets say Country A launches an ICBM (Inter.Continental.Ballistic.Missile) at Country B. Now both countries have sophisticated equipment that can detect nuclear missile launches (These have existed for a while [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_Missile_Early_Warning_System[/url]) now country B can launch a retaliatory strike at Country A, a sort of "If I'm going down I'm taking you with me" scenario. M.A.D. stands for Mutually.Assured.Destruction., in other words both countries are essentially wiped out, by both the initial blast and the ensuing fallout. As for your video it must be outdated as the Cold War between the United States and the USSR (aka Soviet Russia, har har har) ended when the Soviet Union collapsed in the early 1990's.
holy fuck kid are you 5? shut up about nukes.
[QUOTE=CP-26;25392738]Just gonna put this out there: Could our young friend here be trolling? If he is not and is just imbecilic then here is an explanation on how a nuclear war would work. Lets say Country A launches an ICBM (Inter.Continental.Ballistic.Missile) at Country B. Now both countries have sophisticated equipment that can detect nuclear missile launches (These have existed for a while [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_Missile_Early_Warning_System[/url]) now country B can launch a retaliatory strike at Country A, a sort of "If I'm going down I'm taking you with me" scenario. M.A.D. stands for Mutually.Assured.Destruction., in other words both countries are essentially wiped out, by both the initial blast and the ensuing fallout. As for your video it must be outdated as the Cold War between the United States and the USSR (aka Soviet Russia, har har har) ended when the Soviet Union collapsed in the early 1990's.[/QUOTE]
the video did look old fashond. but now i think i understand. if someone shoots a nuke at someone else. that person can shoot back because they have missile detectives?
London bridge is falling down falling down
[QUOTE=frost13s;25393373]the video did look old fashond. but now i think i understand. if someone shoots a nuke at someone else. that person can shoot back because they have missile detectives?[/QUOTE]
Finally you fucking get it.
100%.
London has done nothing wrong.
[QUOTE=Dav0r;25381370]If a nuclear bomb hit frost13s mom's house, would anyone give a shit?[/QUOTE]
Oh that slaps me on the knee.
Anyway: no. never.
Why does this thread span 3 pages?
3 pages of 5 year old 4chan users
[QUOTE=frost13s;25382399]thanks everyone you have been really helpful and i am not worried about my grandparent anymore[/QUOTE]
The video you watched was probably from around the time of the Cold war. Next time you watch a video in class, make sure you know when it was filmed.
[QUOTE=alienmartian23;25381496][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction[/url][/QUOTE]
Oh that's so funny, you could be all.
"U MAD?"
[editline]14th October 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=Moose;25387715]Honestly, why London?
Who cares about Britain?
WHO GIVES A FLYING FUCK ABOUT THE UK?
NOT ME, SIR.[/QUOTE]
Your a dick.
You know, your name and avatar (of a jersey) reminds me of my 10 year old brother.
his facebook picture is of that same jersey...
Chinese emperor wants his tea back, bye London
[QUOTE=Crimson_Bomb;25401662]
Your a dick.[/QUOTE]
My a dick.
Give it another 50 years.
[QUOTE=frost13s;25381658]there was an explosion in chernobyl. the fallout did reach london and they still check for radation. a country having nukes does of course increse there chances of being nuked because the country nuking will want to get rid of a threat.[/QUOTE]
Chernobyl didn't produce fallout. Fallout is where a nuclear warhead detonates above the ground and throws soil into the air that "catches" the radiation, that then settles over the next hundred years and forms fallout. Chernobyl spread radioactive graphite across europe when it was destroyed, and only trace amounts were found in places as far away as London.
1st. Proberly no one would nuke london
2nd.Becuase it would blow up the whole of GB ( modern day science is a bitch but awseome at the same time) i meen look at hiroshima, also i cant spell it as you can tell, still the hiroshima bomb was quite big and that was in the 40s
3rd. We havnt done anything wrong ( yet, knowing this dick we call a primeminister anything could happen -_- )
and lastly we are a nice county who drink tea and crumpets :downs:
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.