If you're using the FP watermark, feel free to [I]keel over and die.[/I]
The watermarks are annoying and pointless. Who honestly cares if an OC from facepunch gets onto another site?
[QUOTE=Scarbo;36634460][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/uHLFP.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]
That watermark us useless.
All it would take is 5 seconds of cropping and then they can claim it as their own.
[vid]http://puu.sh/G474[/vid]
[QUOTE=Scarbo;36634460][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/uHLFP.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]
you know it was originally called the "God Damn" particle because it was so hard to find.
[QUOTE=legolover122;36634553]That watermark us useless.
All it would take is 5 seconds of cropping and then they can claim it as their own.[/QUOTE]
I had figured that the watermark was not actually supposed to watermark things, but to mock all the websites with big ugly watermarks but maybe that's giving FP a bit too much credit for creativity.
[QUOTE=Robber;36634556][vid]http://puu.sh/G474[/vid][/QUOTE]
Is that a new "SAUSAGES" batman clip
[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;36634688]I had figured that the watermark was not actually supposed to watermark things, but to mock all the websites with big ugly watermarks but maybe that's giving FP a bit too much credit for creativity.[/QUOTE]
We rehash the same jokes over and over again, yet I still laugh...
[QUOTE=ToXiCsoldier;36634042]For those asking for it:
[URL="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1698606/FP Watermark creator.rar"]
The FP Watermark generator[/URL][/QUOTE]
doesn't work correctly, bud
My generator:
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/2upSj.png[/IMG]
Yours:
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/qo0a9.png[/IMG]
[editline]5th July 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=legolover122;36634553]That watermark us useless.
All it would take is 5 seconds of cropping and then they can claim it as their own.[/QUOTE]
The reason why it took so long the first day I was writing the software for this was because before I settled on just making a simple 9GAG/FunnyJunk-esque banner watermark, I was researching invisible watermark algorithms.
Unfortunately, I didn't go through with it because:
1) The watermark stuff is suppose to be an ironic joke that should have died already
2) All of the research papers on invisible watermark algorithms produced ambiguous watermarks that were, in my opinion, worthless to the average Internet user
[QUOTE=legolover122;36634553]That watermark us useless.
All it would take is 5 seconds of cropping and then they can claim it as their own.[/QUOTE]
And yet nobody in this thread can do it.
[QUOTE=Griffster26;36635133][video=youtube;JcniyQYFU6M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcniyQYFU6M[/video][/QUOTE]
Superior version
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WX58CZwyiU[/media]
[QUOTE=Robber;36634556]http://puu.sh/G474[/QUOTE]
These god damn automatically playing videos are annoying.
[QUOTE=amcfaggot;36635056][img]http://i.imgur.com/xdqFV.gif[/img][/QUOTE]
That guy clearly knows what the fuck he's doing.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/JcJvL.jpg[/IMG]
ugh
why
[QUOTE=raviool;36635507][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/JcJvL.jpg[/IMG]
ugh[/QUOTE]
Oh look, people getting mad at shit that's totally fucking irrelevant to them.
[QUOTE=AutomataReturns;36634768][img]http://puu.sh/FZcv[/img][/QUOTE]
Is that Harry Osborn from Ultimate Spiderman comic...?
[QUOTE=Sir Whoopsalot;36635536]Oh look, people getting mad at shit that's totally fucking irrelevant to them.[/QUOTE]
To be fair, it is pretty fucking retarded.
edit: what the guy did, I mean
[QUOTE=Sir Whoopsalot;36635536]Oh look, people getting mad at shit that's totally fucking irrelevant to them.[/QUOTE]
Welcome to the fucking internet, can I get you a tea or coffee?
