• Unpopular opinions! V2: I Don't like half life edition.
    17,782 replies, posted
I absolutely 100% do not care about Game of Thrones, Breaking Bad, Walking Dead or any other major show of the sort. I think the only two decent crime shows on TV are Bones and Criminal Minds. I don't like the MGS series.
Daft Punk fans can't accept any criticism.
[QUOTE=WeekendWarrior;43698372]Daft Punk fans can't accept any criticism.[/QUOTE] While I am a huge fan of them, I can agree with this, most can't.
Fuck me for saying this... I fuckin' hate feminism. I just cant stand the shit that most of them say. FFY: I not a shitty fucker that thinks woman should go to the kitchen. In fact I most most of the cleaning and cooking around the house. But yeah... FUCK'em. [video=youtube;nvYyGTmcP80]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvYyGTmcP80[/video]
[QUOTE=Acti;43698589]Fuck me for saying this... I fuckin' hate feminism. I just cant stand the shit that most of them say. FFY: I not a shitty fucker that thinks woman should go to the kitchen. In fact I most most of the cleaning and cooking around the house. But yeah... FUCK'em.[/QUOTE] If that may be so, you also gotta remember that MRAs are a bunch of whiny pedantic morons that think there is some vast Illuminati feminist conspiracy while seemingly ignoring the fact that their own gender runs the majority of the world.
[QUOTE=Acti;43698589]Fuck me for saying this... I fuckin' hate feminism. I just cant stand the shit that most of them say. FFY: I not a shitty fucker that thinks woman should go to the kitchen. In fact I most most of the cleaning and cooking around the house. But yeah... FUCK'em. [video=youtube;nvYyGTmcP80]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvYyGTmcP80[/video][/QUOTE] What kind of feminists have you heard or read about? There are quite a large number of different movements with varying goals and definition that go by the moniker of feminist.
[QUOTE=Rangergxi;43689472]The "N word" isn't racist since there are plenty of white "N words". Calling it the "N word" to not be racist is dumb. You're probably a racist if you're overly worried about offending black people.[/QUOTE] There are no 'white N words' what the hell are you saying
[QUOTE=Tacosheller;43699092]There are no 'white N words' what the hell are you saying[/QUOTE] [img]http://i.imgur.com/XEmhBTp.png?1[/img] Looks like a white N word to me. :v:
[QUOTE=Tacosheller;43699092]There are no 'white N words' what the hell are you saying[/QUOTE] He probably means racist words to refer to white people with, like "cracker" or "wigger".
[QUOTE=Lordgeorge16;43699208]He probably means racist words to refer to white people with, like "cracker" or "wigger".[/QUOTE] wigger isnt racist though, it's like weeabo but when white people pretend to be black.
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;43697407]People who care more about animals than humans need to get their priorities checked.[/QUOTE] A lot of these kinds of people are massively stupid and have no idea what they're talking about and only care about cute animals as well. There are insects, spiders, snails, lice going extinct. Or even more important, microbes such as bacteria, what's going to get more likes on facebook? SAVE THE SNOW LEOPARD, or SAVE THIS BACTERIA? [QUOTE=WeekendWarrior;43698372]Daft Punk fans can't accept any criticism.[/QUOTE] Most fans of any form of entertainment can't accept criticism at all(gamers are about as bad as music, people who read books and watch movies are a bit better imo), ESPECIALLY when it comes to music. First off, they're defending artists that don't care about them at all, to them, their defenders are just dollar signs that are promoting them for free. And many people take attacks on an artist they like as a personal attack as well, and get LEGITIMATELY angry, when they're defending a product they've payed for (if you make any money from your music, it's a product, it's art too so don't get angry at that). It's like them defending a brand of mattress, who cares, it's a company you bought a product from, you have no need to defend them.
[QUOTE=thelurker1234;43699316]There are insects, [B]spiders[/B], snails, lice going extinct[/QUOTE] good riddance
[QUOTE=Lordgeorge16;43699365]good riddance[/QUOTE] Most spiders are perfectly content to leave you alone and they matter A LOT to the local environment. and come on would you not cuddle with this cute thing [IMG]http://gallery.photo.net/photo/5991649-md.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=WeekendWarrior;43698372]Daft Punk fans can't accept any criticism.[/QUOTE] Oh this reminds me Daft Punk is overrated
[QUOTE=BananaFoam;43697287]I really want to like Crusader Kings II, but there is just so much micromanagement and, in my opinion, the design is not very intuitive. I always go into it thinking it will be awesome, mostly because it has the best mods. But then I get bogged down in dozens of menus trying to make sense of who owns what and who is a vassal to me and who is not directly a vassal but still a liege and what the difference is and who is allied with who and who is family with who and what families control what kingdoms and who is unhappy and scheming against me and how do I stop them and how do I get certain traits and who should I appoint and will removing people to appoint new people piss someone off and why are people declaring war on me while I am at war with another kingdom and what De Jure means and how claims work and how wars work and how to use the members of my court and technological progress and transferring vassals and making other people my vassal and trying to make them switch sides and trying to incite rebellion amongst the nobles and trying to kill the kings and trying to acquire kingdoms through inheritance and trying to expand the demense in my kingdom through inheritance and how does succession work and who should I assassinate and if I wait for succession will my guy die and will someone somehow inherit my throne and how do these nobles keep acquiring fiefs without me knowing and why is important information shown in brief messages at the top of the screen with no further explanation and why is it so hard? Basically, it is a cluster-fuck. Maybe I am a drooling simpleton, but the game is overly complex and the presentation isn't that good. It is a pain in the ass to find specific people in your realm and you have to be mindful or everyone, everything, and everything everyone could be doing. It is hard to explain why I don't think the presentation isn't that good, but I'll try. Too many menus and yet the most important things don't even have straight-forward menus, and if they do, they are hard to find. It is a pain in the ass trying to understand who owns what even in a tiny kingdom. Yeah, it just isn't my kind of game, but I cannot understand how keeping track of this mess is fun to [I]anyone.[/I] I mean, the game is immensely true to life as far a medieval politics goes, but that is exactly my point. Medieval politics is complex, mind-boggling, headache inducing, nauseating, and generally unpleasant. Also, Paradox is terrible with DLC. You can't play as a Republic until you buy the DLC. You can't play as Pagans until you buy the DLC. You can also buy music (yes, you need to [I]buy[/I] the faction-specific soundtrack), leader portraits, and the ability to create your own leader. People bitch about EA but the amount of DLC Paradox slaps on its games is absurd. Then there is EUIII, with Heir to the Throne, Divine Wind, and [I]fucking unit models[/I] all sold as DLC. I know two of those are expansions but they should have been in the base game. Still, it's the only grand strategy game where I can play in the Elder Scrolls universe, even if the mod is barely half finished.[/QUOTE] There are two ways to learn those type of complex games. Either watch people play it, or keep trying and failing (and reading the wiki) until you kinda know what you're doing. As for the DLC policy... CK was always about feudal lords. Muslims, republics, etc. are something extra. Also you have to understand this isn't like Total War where every faction plays the same. New mechanics were developed for those guys after the game was released and that's what you pay for when you buy the expansions. Also I understand that selling unit sprites sounds a bit wrong, but if you've been playing the game for a while you'll realise that 3/4 of the new content was added in free patches (as opposed to DLC) so in the end it's not [I]that[/I] bad. For example the next expansion will add India to the game, but even if you don't buy it you will get the new map for free in the patch.
[QUOTE=BananaFoam;43697287]I really want to like Crusader Kings II, but there is just so much micromanagement and, in my opinion, the design is not very intuitive. I always go into it thinking it will be awesome, mostly because it has the best mods. But then I get bogged down in dozens of menus trying to make sense of who owns what and who is a vassal to me and who is not directly a vassal but still a liege and what the difference is and who is allied with who and who is family with who and what families control what kingdoms and who is unhappy and scheming against me and how do I stop them and how do I get certain traits and who should I appoint and will removing people to appoint new people piss someone off and why are people declaring war on me while I am at war with another kingdom and what De Jure means and how claims work and how wars work and how to use the members of my court and technological progress and transferring vassals and making other people my vassal and trying to make them switch sides and trying to incite rebellion amongst the nobles and trying to kill the kings and trying to acquire kingdoms through inheritance and trying to expand the demense in my kingdom through inheritance and how does succession work and who should I assassinate and if I wait for succession will my guy die and will someone somehow inherit my throne and how do these nobles keep acquiring fiefs without me knowing and why is important information shown in brief messages at the top of the screen with no further explanation and why is it so hard? Basically, it is a cluster-fuck. Maybe I am a drooling simpleton, but the game is overly complex and the presentation isn't that good. It is a pain in the ass to find specific people in your realm and you have to be mindful or everyone, everything, and everything everyone could be doing. It is hard to explain why I don't think the presentation isn't that good, but I'll try. Too many menus and yet the most important things don't even have straight-forward menus, and if they do, they are hard to find. It is a pain in the ass trying to understand who owns what even in a tiny kingdom. Yeah, it just isn't my kind of game, but I cannot understand how keeping track of this mess is fun to [I]anyone.[/I] I mean, the game is immensely true to life as far a medieval politics goes, but that is exactly my point. Medieval politics is complex, mind-boggling, headache inducing, nauseating, and generally unpleasant. Also, Paradox is terrible with DLC. You can't play as a Republic until you buy the DLC. You can't play as Pagans until you buy the DLC. You can also buy music (yes, you need to [I]buy[/I] the faction-specific soundtrack), leader portraits, and the ability to create your own leader. People bitch about EA but the amount of DLC Paradox slaps on its games is absurd. Then there is EUIII, with Heir to the Throne, Divine Wind, and [I]fucking unit models[/I] all sold as DLC. I know two of those are expansions but they should have been in the base game. Still, it's the only grand strategy game where I can play in the Elder Scrolls universe, even if the mod is barely half finished.[/QUOTE] Trying to keep track of everything is a mistake. You can advance a day, TWEAK EVERYTHING EXACTLY, advance to the next day, etc. but it will be horrible. Really the best idea is to set everything up how you want it, let it run pretty quickly, and pause to make adjustments as necessary, or slow down when you're in a war and need to manage your armies. It's not like an RTS like Starcraft or Company of Heroes where you're meant to micromanage every last detail. (additionally, saying there's too much micromanagement maybe is not the best term to use, since really there's essentially none) [editline]28th January 2014[/editline] I play a lot of starcraft and I had the same issue with EU3 and CK2 until I played a campaign with a friend who had been playing for a long time
[QUOTE=thelurker1234;43699373]Most spiders are perfectly content to leave you alone and they matter A LOT to the local environment. and come on would you not cuddle with this cute thing big motherfucking spider[/QUOTE] Those of us with arachnophobia would [i]highly[/i] appreciate it if you would [noparse][url][/noparse] tag that image.
[QUOTE=WeekendWarrior;43698372]Daft Punk fans can't accept any criticism.[/QUOTE] Most Daft Punk fans. I love them because I grew up listening to their music, but I totally think they're overrated as fuck
69 jokes are stupid.
[QUOTE=Outro-intro;43702530]69 jokes are stupid.[/QUOTE] I thought that's a no-shit situation with everyone above the age of 12?
Feminism isn't evil.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;43702978]Feminism isn't evil.[/QUOTE] I'm probably not wording this right but I don't think the concept is evil nor all of the people, it's the extemist execution that is all you see that's evil.
[QUOTE=DeVotchKa;43703262]I'm probably not wording this right but I don't think the concept is evil nor all of the people, it's the extemist execution that is all you see that's evil.[/QUOTE] I get what you're saying, but the problem with how people judge based on that is that then you're stereotyping a very large and by no means unified group by a small vocal minority, which is also something that I don't think you should do.
[QUOTE=Outro-intro;43702530]69 jokes are stupid.[/QUOTE] I wish GTA knew this. The fourth one, especially, has a stupid abundance of 69 jokes
[QUOTE=Samiam22;43704315]I wish GTA knew this. The fourth one, especially, has a stupid abundance of 69 jokes[/QUOTE] It's just as bad in tf2. SELLING A LEVEL 69 DEGREASER THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SEX BUT IT'S LEVEL 69 SO I'M CHARGING 2 REC INSTEAD OF A SCRAP HURR HURR SEX
[QUOTE=Outro-intro;43704660]It's just as bad in tf2. SELLING A LEVEL 69 DEGREASER THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SEX BUT IT'S LEVEL 69 SO I'M CHARGING 2 REC INSTEAD OF A SCRAP HURR HURR SEX[/QUOTE] That's not really a joke the game itself is.making, though.
[QUOTE=Samiam22;43704315]I wish GTA knew this. The fourth one, especially, has a stupid abundance of 69 jokes[/QUOTE] that's kinda the point though. literally all the humor in gta games is extremely childish
Daniel Tosh is an annoying jackass.
[QUOTE=Lordgeorge16;43701043]Those of us with arachnophobia would [I]highly[/I] appreciate it if you would [noparse][url][/noparse] tag that image.[/QUOTE] I highly doubt you LITERALLY have arachnophobia In most cases arachnophobia isn't even a real phobia for people, they're just afraid of something they don't know too much about, spiders are small, hairy, and "many" can cause great harm to you (most do produce venom, but very few are actually able to hurt you), so thus, many people are terrified of them. In america, the brown recluse spider is really the only one you should be too concerned about(and it's mostly confined to the southern states, and a couple more northern ones), the tarantulas in america are a joke compared to old-world tarantulas, and widow spiders (especially the black widow) are more than content to stay out of your way, and bites are usually provoked. A phobia is an irrational fear, but for people who aren't too educated on spiders it's actually pretty reasonable for them to be afraid of them. [QUOTE=asteroidrules;43702978]Feminism isn't evil.[/QUOTE] Why not focus on equality rather than advancing one gender? Is there any reason not to? Because men do have it worse in some areas. If feminists talked about BOTH group's issues I'd think they'd recieve a lot more support.
The only thing I agree with on the topic of Mens Rights is the issue of circumcision.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.