• Unpopular opinions! V2: I Don't like half life edition.
    17,782 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Greetings;43880426]promiscuity is disgusting in both men and women.[/QUOTE] care to explain why you think this? i know a lot of people think that being promiscuous is wrong and something to be ashamed of but i've never heard the logic behind it.
[QUOTE=Cyanlime;43880440]care to explain why you think this? i know a lot of people think that being promiscuous is wrong and something to be ashamed of but i've never heard the logic behind it.[/QUOTE] I guess the word I am looking for is "adulterous." Promiscuity doesn't bother me as much, but I can't help but not want to date somebody or seek a relationship with somebody who was promiscuous in the past.
[QUOTE=Greetings;43880426]I hate the look of yoga pants[/QUOTE] you [i]monster[/i]
[QUOTE=BananaFoam;43877868]Massive AOT rant[/QUOTE] This isn't really an unpopular opinion. The ones that like it are just really vocal about it
Johnny Depp can fuck right off.
[QUOTE=Greetings;43880426]I hate the look of yoga pants[/QUOTE] Uhh, people don't wear yoga pants to look good, they wear them because they don't care about looking good and wanna wear something comfortable that day [QUOTE=Laferio;43881565]Johnny Depp can fuck right off.[/QUOTE] y?
[QUOTE=thelurker1234;43881853]Uhh, people don't wear yoga pants to look good, they wear them because they don't care about looking good and wanna wear something comfortable that day[/QUOTE] How does that mean I can't dislike the look of them?
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;43870588]HOW[/QUOTE] I'm an anarchist so what the hell, I'll spout some shit. In my opinion, I think people would be better off not having to have a government by their side and over their shouldef, BUT, not now. We're way too used to it and if the government just suddenly fucks off, then people will probably go into a widespread panic. That's just my theory though.
[QUOTE=Greetings;43881908]How does that mean I can't dislike the look of them?[/QUOTE] Eh, true, was thinking that you were talking about them in a fashion sense. When I wanna be comfortable I wear stuff other than yoga pants depending on the weather.
[QUOTE=Blazedol;43881963]I'm an anarchist so what the hell, I'll spout some shit. In my opinion, I think people would be better off not having to have a government by their side and over their shouldef, BUT, not now. We're way too used to it and if the government just suddenly fucks off, then people will probably go into a widespread panic. That's just my theory though.[/QUOTE] I agree. [QUOTE=Fosax;43874362]There's a difference between an unpopular opinion and a dumb opinion, if you can't back your own opinion with an argument it's a dumb one.[/QUOTE] It's not that I can't back my argument up - I certainly can. I just know there is literally no way in hell that I can win that argument. My point was just proven in the small shitstorm that ensued me even making a comment about thinking people were better off without a government. [QUOTE=Gwoodman;43874478]you think that despite there being some sort of leadership by someone throughout our entire human history?[/QUOTE] Yes, I do. The reason that there's always been some sort of leadership is not because people need it - it's because there's a power vacuum, the opportunity to lead, when there isn't leadership. I'm not saying it's 100% possible, I believe that someone will always try to take control. I just think it would be better. [QUOTE=WeekendWarrior;43874486]There's unpopular opinions and then there's baseless opinions like yours.[/QUOTE] So, because I'd prefer not to waste my time on an internet argument I know I can't win, that makes my opinion baseless? Just because you don't agree with me doesn't mean that my opinion is any less valid than yours. Look, all I'm saying is that I'm sick of being told what to do. I'm sick of being represented by a government that I don't agree with. There's no government that's going to represent everyone equally and give everyone what they want and I think - [I]personally[/I] - that we'd be better off without one. Again - not saying it's even possible - but in a world where no one tried to build power over others and there was no government, I think it would be better. Sure, there'd probably be more crime, but probably less war considering there would be no government to wage it. Just a hypothetical. So go ahead and rate me dumb and tell me my ideas are stupid.
[QUOTE=Zao Medong;43882769]So, because I'd prefer not to waste my time on an internet argument I know I can't win, that makes my opinion baseless? Just because you don't agree with me doesn't mean that my opinion is any less valid than yours. Look, all I'm saying is that I'm sick of being told what to do. I'm sick of being represented by a government that I don't agree with. There's no government that's going to represent everyone equally and give everyone what they want and I think - [I]personally[/I] - that we'd be better off without one. Again - not saying it's even possible - but in a world where no one tried to build power over others and there was no government, I think it would be better. Sure, there'd probably be more crime, but probably less war considering there would be no government to wage it. Just a hypothetical. So go ahead and rate me dumb and tell me my ideas are stupid.[/QUOTE] I didn't call them dumb, I just thought the government one was baseless (but it's aight now because you've explained your stance).
Well, to be fair, I probably shoulda explained all that in my first post lol.
[QUOTE=thelurker1234;43880287]While I'd disagree with using the term "real rap", these terrible artists are basically making hip hop have a bad reputation. 99% of the time when I ask somebody why they hate rap/hip hop, they mention that it's all about sex drugs partying etc. and mention names such as lil wayne. When there's plenty of rap/hip hop that isn't that.[/QUOTE] rock music from the 80s was all about sex drugs and partying and that gets off. It's not the job of artists like Chief Keef to protect hip hop's legacy, even the original artists in the genre were just as puerile
I agree with that. Although I feel like older rappers did it a lot better.
[url]http://rapgenius.com/Sugar-hill-gang-rappers-delight-lyrics#note-16169[/url] hmmmmm
[QUOTE=Blazedol;43881963]I'm an anarchist so what the hell, I'll spout some shit. In my opinion, I think people would be better off not having to have a government by their side and over their shouldef, BUT, not now. We're way too used to it and if the government just suddenly fucks off, then people will probably go into a widespread panic. That's just my theory though.[/QUOTE] I think the biggest problem with anarchy is there's a lot of assholes out there who would see it as a free ticket to do whatever the hell they want. I highly doubt that humanity will get advanced enough that we wouldn't need to worry about something like that and could actually become a more anarchistic society.
Humans are naturally selfish. This is why Anarchism cannot work.
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;43886244]Humans are naturally selfish. This is why Anarchism cannot work.[/QUOTE] The same condition is also why Communism cannot work properly in a practical environment.
Communism can only work in small populations. It cannot work in large populations like Russia.
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;43886244]Humans are naturally selfish. This is why Anarchism cannot work.[/QUOTE] Humans are also naturally altruistic, naturally inclined to violence, and a great deal of other things.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;43886550]Humans are also naturally altruistic, naturally inclined to violence, and a great deal of other things.[/QUOTE] It's also very strongly dependent on the individual as well though.
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;43886244]Humans are naturally selfish. This is why Anarchism cannot work.[/QUOTE] I don't believe this. Humans are selfish, more so than before, but nobody's born selfish. Well, maybe a little selfish, but not to am extreme point. Our personality and morals shape when we grow up, depending on how we lived. Maybe one day that might change, but considering more shit's happening that gives us a reason to be selfish, I doubt it. Fingers crossed, though.
The "natural selfishness" is more the instinct of self-preservation and survival in my opinion but a lot humans use it as an excuse to do a lot of incredibly selfish-to-the-point-of-vulgarity things that go past that.
I think Titanfall looks pretty "meh". At best. I really don't get what all the hype is about. The mechs? Okay sure, but lots of other games have done mech gameplay infinitely better than what I've seen of Titanfall, which to me just looks mostly the same as infantry combat but the player is scaled up.
I don't care about Titanfall in the slightest. Uses source ? I don't care at all. EVERYBODY talks about how great it'll be and I don't care. If only there was a real-life filter or guy who punches people when talking about Titanfall [I]legally[/I].
[QUOTE=ROFLBURGER;43886244]Humans are naturally selfish. This is why Anarchism cannot work.[/QUOTE] yeah i'm in the "say 'ron paul 2012' sarcastically" camp too but some people are both selfless and selfish. it's good to have a bit of both - give some and take some.
I actually like Radioactive by Imagine Dragons
I'd be super hyped for Titanfall if it was a 30€ indie like Natural Selection 2. But as a 60€ game with EA's obligatory map packs it's a lot less interesting.
[QUOTE=Kljunas;43888707]I'd be super hyped for Titanfall if it was a 30€ indie like Natural Selection 2. But as a 60€ game with EA's obligatory map packs it's a lot less interesting.[/QUOTE] It's 60 euros? what the fuck, isn't that like 80-90 USD?
[QUOTE=Ownederd;43888738]It's 60 euros? what the fuck, isn't that like 80-90 USD?[/QUOTE] Yeah, 81$. It's 55€ on Amazon.fr though and it seems it can be even a bit cheaper here in Switzerland but it's still way too expensive (around 65$).
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.