• Unpopular opinions! V2: I Don't like half life edition.
    17,782 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Dawcio510;44738725]7 disagrees? Alright... How about you watch some youtube CoD crap and disagree with me again, okay? It's not my fault that CoD Multiplayer hackers and skilled players change normal kids into retarded dumbasses with fucked up nerves untill they will realize that it's just a [B]GODDAMN[/B] game, sorry but it's true. Here are those CoD videos involving butthurts in them (They're just completely randomly searched videos that I didn't bother watching to the end but I know they involve raging CoD fanboys) [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEV-_zWQlj0[/url] [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JSH2_kq5O0[/url] [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTP_Rnc7VdU[/url] [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMTnj-SH2O4[/url][/QUOTE] If you don't want to get pissed off in a mainstream FPS game, you should only play with your friends. Don't join up with random strangers and expect a good time. Shit like that only happens in Team Fortress 2 (and even then it's fairly uncommon).
Fallout 4 should run on id Tech 5. I know people will disagree with this, since the Creation Engine is much more suited for open world games, and while it's likely that said open world will be broken up into several maps, I can't help but think that id Tech will do a lot of favors for the combat.
[QUOTE=flashn00b;44742343]Fallout 4 should run on id Tech 5. I know people will disagree with this, since the Creation Engine is much more suited for open world games, and while it's likely that said open world will be broken up into several maps, I can't help but think that id Tech will do a lot of favors for the combat.[/QUOTE] I would prefer any engine over the current one, its a piece of shit
[QUOTE=flashn00b;44742343]Fallout 4 should run on id Tech 5. I know people will disagree with this, since the Creation Engine is much more suited for open world games, and while it's likely that said open world will be broken up into several maps, I can't help but think that id Tech will do a lot of favors for the combat.[/QUOTE] My main worry about a new engine is how easy it will be to mod. A lot of modern game engines use third party software and have no mod tools as a result.
[QUOTE=Nemisis116;44742707]I would prefer any engine over the current one, its a piece of shit[/QUOTE] Here's an unpopular opinion. Creation (and Gamebryo) is not as bad as everyone likes to say it is.
I think the problem with Gamebyro games is that Bethesda puts so much shit in their games that they can't really find all of the bugs when they're testing for them. They've already worked hard on it, so they probably just say "Fuck it, good enough."
[QUOTE=thelurker1234;44741700]Because it's such a stupid opinion, people might have it in real life, but they'd definitely voice it in a way to make them not sound like shit. But yeah, I probably could have slipped something else to make it a bit more clear.[/QUOTE] hard to tell that it's sarcasm considering the fucking terrible opinions that've been posted here better luck next time
[QUOTE=milkandcooki;44743912]hard to tell that it's sarcasm considering the fucking terrible opinions that've been posted here better luck next time[/QUOTE] Also, sarcasm doesn't translate well to text
Louis CK gets too much of his comedy by pandering to typical liberal opinions and mostly by saying how shitty men are. iirc one of his most famous bits goes like "men are lucky, we get women. All women get are shitty men!!"
[QUOTE=NoShogun;44744917]Louis CK gets too much of his comedy by pandering to typical liberal opinions and mostly by saying how shitty men are. iirc one of his most famous bits goes like "men are lucky, we get women. All women get are shitty men!!"[/QUOTE] I like his reasoning behind the usage of the word "faggot". He doesn't call someone a faggot because he's insulting them for being homosexual, he calls someone a faggot because he's insulting them for being a faggot. Makes me feel a lot better about using the word.
The age of "Robotic Warfare" is a dawn of a more peaceful era, as conventional forces will be slowly phased out in favour of unmanned, electronic warriors. Yes, paranoia would grip nations as they constantly watch the skies in fear of the enemy, but it becomes easier to retaliate. It's a new form of MAD, but much smaller scale.
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;44746338]The age of "Robotic Warfare" is a dawn of a more peaceful era, as conventional forces will be slowly phased out in favour of unmanned, electronic warriors. Yes, paranoia would grip nations as they constantly watch the skies in fear of the enemy, but it becomes easier to retaliate. It's a new form of MAD, but much smaller scale.[/QUOTE] In all honesty the real winners of robot v robot warfare will be the ones where the war takes place. They'll have so much scrap metal and rare earth metals like Iridium lying around they'd make a mint.
Yoshi is my least favorite Mario character.
When people say "Free Speech means you are protected from the government censoring you, but you have to face the consequences of your opinion in public" is really just following the letters, but not the spirit. There are an awful lot of people, who, while being legally able to speak, would otherwise be cast out from their communities, shunned, fired or barred from employment, sidelined, unable to distribute media because of extensive opposition, etc. When people say this, it is just saying "We will do everything to show how free you are able to speak your opinion, but we only permit you to the level that the outside world does not see us as authoritarians who suppress opinions". Thankfully the rise of the internet means that unpopular views can get out into the open more easily. Some of them are good.
Okay, here's a big one: "world policing" is a really good thing. Turning a blind eye to situations that need to be improved when you have the capability to improve them is detrimental to all involved.
Here's an unpopular opinion.. AHEM.... Outlast was fun and was alright. No really, I feel this way about it.\ BUT ONE THING IS FOR CERTAIN. The ending was worse than the ending to ME3
[QUOTE=Episode;44751568]Here's an unpopular opinion.. AHEM.... Outlast was fun and was alright. No really, I feel this way about it.\ BUT ONE THING IS FOR CERTAIN. The ending was [b]worse than the ending to ME3[/b][/QUOTE] First of all, there are four main endings. Two of them even branch off into numerous different possibilities based on the choices you made throughout the trilogy, your Paragon/Renegade scores, and other similar factors. Second of all, the endings really aren't that bad. I personally think Control is the worst scenario because it's what the Illusive Man wanted all along and he was the biggest douchebag in the entire series, but it does have its positive points (Shepard is the new Catalyst, he controls all of the Reapers and uses them to either protect or rule over the galaxy based on Paragon/Renegade scores). Destroy is a pretty good ending as long as you have enough EMS at the end to keep Shepard alive, and it's the ending that seems the most realistic. Synthesis is just the fucking best because it merges all synthetic and organic life, which means no more "synthetics will rise up and destroy organic life" future so the Reapers no longer need to harvest the galaxy every fifty thousand years and they help rebuild the galaxy instead. The krogan genophage is instantly cured if you chose to sabotage it, the quarians can live without their suits, the geth now understand human emotions and values, and pretty much the entire galaxy is at peace forever. Finally, the Refusal ending is pretty unique in the sense that Shepard lets the harvest continue so the next cycle's races will have to make one of the three other choices to stop the Reapers. I myself don't like it, but I'm not saying it's awful. [b]TL;DR[/b] - Mass Effect 3 was just as good as the first two games, and its endings are all great in their own, unique ways. You just need to find the ending that's right for you, don't hop on the bandwagon just because you didn't get the ending you wanted the first time around.
Nah the endings sucked cock compared to the average quality of the rest of the series
I think Bo Burnham is funny as fuck
I really like Turn Down For What.
[QUOTE=Dub!;44754716]I think Bo Burnham is funny as fuck[/QUOTE] Is that unpopular? I see stuff from him posted all the time. I never met anyone who really complained that he was unfunny.
As much as I'd love to believe otherwise, Smash and Mario Kart aren't going to come close to "saving" the Wii U.
[QUOTE=JohnnyMo1;44756061]Is that unpopular? I see stuff from him posted all the time. I never met anyone who really complained that he was unfunny.[/QUOTE] A lot of hate comes towards his 'theatrical' way of comedy. Supoisvely he isn't a 'real' comedian from what some people say.
I, personally, don't enjoy his work but I can definitely see the merits and why people would like it.
Gonna snip most of this because I look like a dipshit, but I'm still fucking sick of WW2 games and hope they don't come back for a long time
ive never liked killing floor all that much, game gets incredibly repetitive after a while for me, and ranking up is such a grind might also just be that ive never had any friends to play it with, and have had to play with pubbies (which is a given incredibly shitty), so ive not had much fun to begin with either
[QUOTE=Furnost;44759517]ive never liked killing floor all that much, game gets incredibly repetitive after a while for me, and ranking up is such a grind might also just be that ive never had any friends to play it with, and have had to play with pubbies (which is a given incredibly shitty), so ive not had much fun to begin with either[/QUOTE] Killing Floor is so much fun with friends, but I do agree that I hate the mindless grinding involved in leveling up. Definitely the hardest for Commando, my favorite class.
[QUOTE=Skyward;44756089]As much as I'd love to believe otherwise, Smash and Mario Kart aren't going to come close to "saving" the Wii U.[/QUOTE] Considering how past versions of Mario Kart have blown away even the best selling CoDs in sales, I don't think that's accurate. Especially with the bargain that is the MK8 bundle.
[QUOTE=l337k1ll4;44759835]Considering how past versions of Mario Kart have blown away even the best selling CoDs in sales, I don't think that's accurate. Especially with the bargain that is the MK8 bundle.[/QUOTE] Mario Kart sold so damn well because the Wii was already widely owned, it was deeply proliferated the market. But now that its exclusive to a failing console? It'll sell very well to Wii U owners, but it won't move consoles.
[QUOTE=Skyward;44756089]As much as I'd love to believe otherwise, Smash and Mario Kart aren't going to come close to "saving" the Wii U.[/QUOTE] Yeah, it's the third party games, the WiiU just has nothing that would draw them in. It will always have nintendo's fantastic first party games, but other than that nothing. Next to the hardware power that is PC/PS4/xbone, the WiiU is terrible. It has a shitty UI and network experience. And as for external hardware, the touchscreen controller is not exciting whatsoever, whereas PS4/PC has VR, and Xbone has the kinect (which is exciting to the average consumer). Also the fucking name sucks ass. What the hell were they thinking? In its first year, 90% of average people I've talked to thought it was a peripheral. They should've called it the Wii 2. Honestly they shouldn't've called it the Wii at all. The Wii was a system for the burgeoning market of new gamers in the mid 2000s, and now that like 75% of people play videogames, people are fine with buying other more "hardcore" consoles.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.