• Unpopular opinions! V2: I Don't like half life edition.
    17,782 replies, posted
Bioshock Infinite can't hold a candle to Bioshock 1
[QUOTE=Katamari101;40745955]You already said that multiple times.[/QUOTE] I did? Bleh I have a shitty memory...
Alan Wake was boring as shit
Humans will never reach the "golden age" of humanity. Or if it looks like one to us here and now, it won't be one for them.
I support idea of ID'ing people with AIDS, or their isolation.
I personally believe that we should all PRE-ORDER THE LIVING FUCK OUT OF THE PC PORT OF METAL GEAR RISING! Reason is cuz Platinum Games are good at the things they do, and I feel that their first PC game shouldn't be their last! And although I do hope that it'll be on par with Capcom's Devil May Cry 4 in terms of porting quality, I won't complain if it isn't.
Nutella is overrated. So is Legend of Zelda.
Samurai and Dynasty Warriors games are all great even though they only change a little bit with each one.
there's nothing wrong with liking something that's popular [QUOTE=Unisath;40756846]It's hard to identify a golden age until something has reached its end. We can say when the Roman empire's golden age was, because we have a definitive beginning and end of the empire. Until humanity is gone, we can't judge whether or not there is an actual golden age, because something better could always come. It won't be up to us to define a golden age, just like it wasn't up to the Romans to define theirs.[/QUOTE] 2deep4me
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;40749681]Humans will never reach the "golden age" of humanity. Or if it looks like one to us here and now, it won't be one for them.[/QUOTE] It's hard to identify a golden age until something has reached its end. We can say when the Roman empire's golden age was, because we have a definitive beginning and end of the empire. Until humanity is gone, we can't judge whether or not there is an actual golden age, because something better could always come. It won't be up to us to define a golden age, just like it wasn't up to the Romans to define theirs.
[QUOTE=Skyward;40744734]Halo 4 was a horrible, horrible game- and an insult to the original series. The series should never have continued after Bungie.[/QUOTE] FINALLY, someone said it.
[QUOTE=Captain Chalky;40723262]Sims has terrible Expansion Packs, imo. Some of them are good, but others have content that should come with the main game. Seasons, for example. It's like if some FPS had an expansion pack which enabled scopes.[/QUOTE] I thought Seasons was the best one for Sims 2 :( But most of the expansions just come with items that could have easily been made by others uploaded to modthesims2 or whatever the website is called. Still bought them all [sp]And they were all stolen from me[/sp] [sp]my childhood stolen[/sp]
[QUOTE=BananaFoam;40757403]FINALLY, someone said it.[/QUOTE] Apparently it was so bad he felt the need to say it twice too. :v:
[QUOTE=Alice3173;40757893]Apparently it was so bad he felt the need to say it twice too. :v:[/QUOTE] It's bad enough to warrant more, really. [editline]23rd May 2013[/editline] You really can't overstate the shitiness. [editline]23rd May 2013[/editline] Like, I could be slowly lowered into an industrial shredder foot-first and be like "at least I am not playing Halo 4"
halo 3 was terrible, shoehorning things in and killing off likable characters. it's almost like bungie intentionally destroyed the halo series, sealing the deal with reach.
I'm actually quite against foreign aid. Giving money to a third world/developing country is not going to fix their problems. Most of the money will either go into people's pockets or into the never ending debts some of these countries are in. I do approve of foreign assistance though, where both of the countries work together to fix the roots of their problems. For example, Iceland teaching Namibia how to mass fish and how to set up preservation facilities (we call it "frystihús" or freezing houses") and teaching them how to market the fish.
Payday is extremely generic and Overkill could only be bigger corporate scumbags if they advertised energy drinks. But everyone thinks that's fine as long as they're not EA.
Some people take the Internet way too seriously.
[QUOTE=Smashing Good;40762152]Some people take the Internet way too seriously.[/QUOTE] And some don't take it seriously enough as well.
killing floor is boring and repetetive, only takes a couple hours of gameplay to know the enemies and their abilites inside out.
I think third wave feminists are fighting for issues that are already resolved and no longer exist for the sake of beating a dead horse.
I hope humanity never gains immortality or the ability to infinitely sustain itself in space or escape the effects of cosmic disasters. We really, really don't deserve it, at least as we are now. [editline]24th May 2013[/editline] Blond is my least favourite colour, grey-grey is my most favourite colour. I only really like dress clothes (like white blouses and black trousers, not tuxedos and hats and shit) and hate jeans. I never, ever want to be taller than my spouse. I hate facial, limb, and body hair of any sort. Hate dancing, hate anyone who is too masculine or feminine. [editline]24th May 2013[/editline] If I ever met someone with grey eyes and black hair in a dress outfit I'd drop with joy. Oh, and, the thought of someone being dangerous or physically violent is attractive to me.
I hate religion but I still think people should respect other people's beliefs.
[QUOTE=jackteam54;40766076]I hate religion but I still think people should respect other people's beliefs.[/QUOTE] It really depends on how reasonable the person is. I can respect people who have a faith, who look at scientific facts, understand and accept them, and have a belief that it is the work of a God, using their faith as a motivator for themselves to do good things. I still find it rather strange that they are intelligent enough to understand these things and still believe in a singular God, despite many other conflicting religions, which I would respectfully debate with such a person if they were open to it, but if not then fair enough, their belief is doing no harm anyway, and they are obviously a person who can raise a child based on the known facts, giving them the ability to make up their own mind. But then there's the bigots who reject the science, or are too stupid to understand the science, and push for ridiculous things like Creationism to be taught in the Science classroom, as an opposing theory, as though there is actually a controversy between them, who would raise a child with such a narrow, medieval religious view on the world, that can cause harm to society; and I perfectly agree with Richard Dawkins that it is essentially child abuse. You cannot treat those people with respect, because treating them with respect would consist of you letting them have their own way, which would be to have things taught to children that we simply now know are not true.
Getting rated dumb by one guy =/= being dumb
I do not doubt the existence of something because I can not see it yet. A painter, electrician, and an untrained person can stand in the same room and yet see completely different things. The painter and electrician sees what I CANNOT SEE because they have awareness or knowledge of something I do not. I CANNOT SEE, but it doesn't mean IT IS NOT THERE.
I don't have a problem with any sort of fetishist, no matter how extreme as long as it doesn't affect others. I think any drug is completely fine as long as it only harms you. I like Reddit. I would rather be happy with what I have than hate it. I feel as a gay dude that being gay is not purely up to birth, I feel it comes from chemical imbalances as well as certain psychological things such as being the youngest of a number of boys. I think people who are "smart yet underachieving" are actually just idiots. I really hate feminists and vegans, at least in more modern versions.
[QUOTE=Unisath;40756846]It's hard to identify a golden age until something has reached its end. We can say when the Roman empire's golden age was, because we have a definitive beginning and end of the empire. Until humanity is gone, we can't judge whether or not there is an actual golden age, because something better could always come. It won't be up to us to define a golden age, just like it wasn't up to the Romans to define theirs.[/QUOTE] but then it is a golden age by comparison, and not unto itself i like paypal
[QUOTE=Otsegolation;40768070]I do not doubt the existence of something because I can not see it yet. A painter, electrician, and an untrained person can stand in the same room and yet see completely different things. The painter and electrician sees what I CANNOT SEE because they have awareness or knowledge of something I do not. I CANNOT SEE, but it doesn't mean IT IS NOT THERE.[/QUOTE] At the same time though, that doesn't imply it does exist either. It implies a lack of evidence one way or the other. Writing off anything without evidence is stupid but so is claiming it certainly exists. [QUOTE=Quinnjdq;40768071]I think people who are "smart yet underachieving" are actually just idiots.[/QUOTE] Or they're just lazy and/or unmotivated.
Vaas wasn't that interesting a character his novelty wore off around the second time you see him
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.