Hot Airplanes

[croguy]

[img]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_dWxPQDiTCxw/SRa5uoQqOlI/AAAAAAAAAJU/x-16XdRy9yE/s320/stinger.jpg[/img]

:smug:

[Meader]

[QUOTE=croguy;19628700]you tell me, I didn't even knew it was possible to draw such a thing.

Then again, if it exists, there IS porn of it.[/QUOTE]

Naive.

[alethemagicbum]

[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Starscream-dd.jpg/180px-Starscream-dd.jpg[/img]

Starscream ftw

[dagoth_ur]

guys, c'mon, if they have a fetish for planes don't ruin the thread for them!!

[Meader]

[QUOTE=dagoth_ur;19629030]guys, c'mon, if they have a fetish for planes don't ruin the thread for them!![/QUOTE]

Nobody is ruining it. I see quite a bit of content here :)

[B1N4RY!]

[QUOTE=Unreliable;19603259]Who the fuck has time to draw out two airplanes fucking eachother.

[editline]10:42[/editline]

Also, where the fuck does it go, there's 2 turbines.[/QUOTE]

Some Jap guy
Use your imagination

[alethemagicbum]

[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7d/Air_Force_One_over_Mt._Rushmore.jpg/300px-Air_Force_One_over_Mt._Rushmore.jpg[/img]

:patriot:

[dagoth_ur]

[QUOTE=Meader;19629042]Nobody is ruining it. I see quite a bit of content here :)[/QUOTE]

i know, but a few guys are... anyway... some nice planes being posted... has everybody forgotten the most important one?

[img]http://www.mecca.org/~tschieff/AVIATION/ACADEMY/Wright_Brothers/wright_flight.jpg[/img]

[croguy]

[QUOTE=dagoth_ur;19629178]i know, but a few guys are... (posting airplane porn in the thread)[/QUOTE]

We're just contributing. There's a reason why "hot" is in the thread title.

:v:

[dagoth_ur]

i wasn't talking about the plane porn....

[Jeppe137]

:flashfap:

Oh god, YEEEEEEES! :gizz:

[crilleX]

[IMG]http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/middle/2/7/3/0578372.jpg[/IMG]

[dagoth_ur]

meh, there are nicer planes...

[Meader]

[QUOTE=dagoth_ur;19634966]meh, there are nicer planes...[/QUOTE]

Pics or it didn't happen.

[xpod1]

[QUOTE=Flaming Neko;19586887]okay
[img_thumb]http://imgkk.com/i/Ca3EOW.jpg[/img_thumb]
[img_thumb]http://imgkk.com/i/OpeY3j.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]

[URL=http://filesmelt.com/][IMG]http://filesmelt.com/dl/No_not_aall.gif[/IMG][/URL]

[dagoth_ur]

[QUOTE=Meader;19635212]Pics or it didn't happen.[/QUOTE]

the A-10 is prettier than that... and that's saying something...
[img]http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/a-10/images/a10_2.jpg[/img]

[Ham_Wallet]

Me 109G6.

2 × 13 mm (.51 in) MG 131 machine guns with 300 rpg
1 × 30 mm (1.18 in) MK 108 cannon as Motorkanone with 65 rpg
Daimler-Benz DB 605A-1 liquid-cooled inverted V12

And for those bomber interceptions just strap on two 20 mm MG 151/20 on the wings via pods... and pwnsauce.

[IMG]http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/7527/me109g6.jpg[/IMG]

[Waals Vander]

i really wasn't sure what i was going to see when i clicked on this thread

[dagoth_ur]

[QUOTE=Waals Vander;19635507]i really wasn't sure what i was going to see when i clicked on this thread[/QUOTE]

what has been seen cannot be unseen....

[squeaky024]

[img]http://mi9.com/datawallpapers/data/19/1292/1157281682/mi-24-hind-helicopter-wallpaper_1024x768.jpg[/img]

[dagoth_ur]

someone who agrees with me, the hind is pretty!!

[img]http://www.facepunch.com/fp/emoot/flashfap.gif[/img]

[PoodleSlayer]

The V-22 Osprey

[img]http://www.military-today.com/helicopters/bellboeing_v_22_osprey.jpg[/img]

is actually considered a tilt-rotor craft. If any of you are familiar with flight regulations, there were previously two classifications of aircraft: rotary-wing (helicopters) and fixed-wing (airplanes). The Osprey is now a hybrid of the two.

VSTOL (vertical short take off and landing) aircraft of old, such as the AV-8B Harrier jump jet and the upcoming JSF-35 are still classified as fixed-wing, and so the Osprey is quite the pioneer. They stick to the expression VSTOL as opposed to VTOL because none of our jets can quite take off directly vertical; they require to roll some distance down the runway first. They could take off vertically theoretically, but the weight for all the fuel needed to burn for upward thrust is just too much on top of the deadweight of the aircraft.

[dagoth_ur]

nice , thanks for clearing that up...

[Resistance777]

[QUOTE=PoodleSlayer;19635686]The V-22 Osprey

[img]http://www.military-today.com/helicopters/bellboeing_v_22_osprey.jpg[/img]

is actually considered a tilt-rotor craft. If any of you are familiar with flight regulations, there were previously two classifications of aircraft: rotary-wing (helicopters) and fixed-wing (airplanes). The Osprey is now a hybrid of the two.

VSTOL (vertical short take off and landing) aircraft of old, such as the AV-8B Harrier jump jet and the upcoming JSF-35 are still classified as fixed-wing, and so the Osprey is quite the pioneer. They stick to the expression VSTOL as opposed to VTOL because none of our jets can quite take off directly vertical; they require to roll some distance down the runway first. They could take off vertically theoretically, but the weight for all the fuel needed to burn for upward thrust is just too much on top of the deadweight of the aircraft.[/QUOTE]

holy shit, that chopper looks real hard to pilot.

[dagoth_ur]

It's a mix... wouldn't be anyharder than flying any old plane/helicopter

[Magman77]

[img]http://www.wingweb.co.uk/wingweb/img/450-Phantom_F-4F_Luftwaffe_KC-135R_RAF_refuel.jpg[/img]

:gizz:

And with no babe in the sky;

[img]http://www.wingweb.co.uk/wingweb/img/450-German_Phantom_F-4F.jpg[/img]

[dagoth_ur]

the jet is about to be raped by the big white stick!!

[Magman77]

[QUOTE=dagoth_ur;19638287]the jet is about to be raped by the big white stick!![/QUOTE]

It already is. :v:

[dagoth_ur]

no, the POOR THING :/

[whatnow V2]

Russian planes are awesome.
[img]http://www.456fis.org/MISC-6/An-225_Mriya%5B1%5D.jpg[/img]