I say this in every thread, IQ as a NUMBER means JACK SHIT. There are several different scales of IQ, Cattel III B, Culture Fair, Weschler. Which all have their own scale.
IQ is Intelligence Quota isnt it?
It dosent mean how smart you are, more your capacity to be smart among other things, i think hand-eye co-ordination is a part of IQ tests, which could probably be why FP has a high average.
-6
[QUOTE=saucekeg;23381044]itt facepunchers are geniuses[/QUOTE]
lolk
[QUOTE=Chickens!;23388048]IQ is Intelligence Quota isnt it?
It dosent mean how smart you are, more your capacity to be smart among other things, i think hand-eye co-ordination is a part of IQ tests, which could probably be why FP has a high average.[/QUOTE]
Intelligence Quotient
It's more about how capable you are at gaining knowledge and making mental connections.
[editline]02:21PM[/editline]
Fucking ninjas up in my grill.
Wow wouldya look at that everyone is at least 2 standard deviations about the mean, I am fucking shocked
Proof once again that Facepunch is an amazing statistical anomaly of IQs and dick lengths
Well, awhile back i took one on facebook (there goes my credibility down the crapper). Initially, the thing buggered up because I didn't have cookies enabled. The second time I took it, I answered in exactly the same way, and gave it roughly the same length of time, and scored 130. I'd subtract a bit, and claim 125.
But in all honesty, I think IQ tests are questionable in their very nature. Richard Feynman was approached by MENSA, who asked him to join their organisation. He turned them down, stating that his IQ was below their minimum requirement. (He had an issue with elitist organisations, which I support to a degree).
So, apparently, I'm as smart as Feynman. Yah, right.
I've failed two of my modules for my degree, and need to take retakes. However, I'm fairly creative (even if I do say so myself). So, I can't crunch numbers or memorise facts especially well, particulary if it doesn't interest me, and this is the same for all people, but if it takes my fancy, I can rival some of the great creatives, such as Lovecraft and Asimov (which you will see evidence of in the not-too-distant future).
[QUOTE=QwertySecond;23388292]Well, awhile back i took one on facebook (there goes my credibility down the crapper)[/QUOTE]
Yep
[QUOTE=acds;23386186]My IQ was 168 when I was 8 but it probably is much higher now, is that gud? Also my penis is 9 inches but I'm still growing also it's very wide.
Sadly I'm far from my stationary, I had averaged the FP IQ taking values form the 10+ pages of "Post you IQ" back in early 2009, and did a simliar thing with penis size. I don't remember exactly, but it was something like 145 IQ average (and around 7.5 inches long dick, though I have no idea of the world average).
I haven't ever tested my IQ (or measured my dick), so I don't know.
Also we should all post how many black belts in martial arts we have and our record for most people defeated bare-handed at the same time.[/QUOTE]
iq goes down
tests cannot be accurate at young ages
132 was my result in a mensa test... Though I'm in the low-end in my family for soem odd reason... BTW: Einsteins IQ were about 160, not 130.
[QUOTE=cryticfarm;23388375]iq goes down
tests cannot be accurate at young ages[/QUOTE]
That can't be the general case. If everyone's IQ went down with age it'd just be renormalized and the score spread would be the same.
IQ tests are only relevant to the time period wherein the individual took the test, and the questions asked on said test. On one occasion, during psychological testing I had earned a 90 IQ. They re-tested me a few weeks later and I received a 143. Stress, the curiculum of questions and the area in which the test is taken can all affect the outcomes of a test. I refuse to label myself by these falsifications of testing for "intelligence". It's not what potential you have, it's what you enact with said potential. It's meaningless to me if I have an 80 IQ or a 150 IQ, it's the character of the person that defines their intelligence. These tests are just another way for human beings to label themselves in order to feel larger than they already are, and to increase the gap between fellow human beings. I'm not stating that there is no difference between a man with an 80 intelligence quotient and a man with an over 130 IQ. I'm simply stating that the correlation between mental capacity and the capacity to contribute to society should not be interwoven, as it always seems to be. TLDR: IQ tests are biased, and should not be a contributing factor to determining the actual intelligence of an individual.
139, I'm convinced the test was bullshit however.
[editline]11:10PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Machk;23388568]IQ tests are only relevant to the time period wherein the individual took the test, and the questions asked on said test. On one occasion, during psychological testing I had earned a 90 IQ. They re-tested me a few weeks later and I received a 143. Stress, the curiculum of questions and the area in which the test is taken can all affect the outcomes of a test. I refuse to label myself by these falsifications of testing for "intelligence". It's not what potential you have, it's what you enact with said potential. It's meaningless to me if I have an 80 IQ or a 150 IQ, it's the character of the person that defines their intelligence. These tests are just another way for human beings to label themselves in order to feel larger than they already are, and to increase the gap between fellow human beings. I'm not stating that there is no difference between a man with an 80 intelligence quotient and a man with an over 130 IQ. I'm simply stating that the correlation between mental capacity and the capacity to contribute to society should not be interwoven, as it always seems to be. TLDR: IQ tests are biased, and should not be a contributing factor to determining the actual intelligence of an individual.[/QUOTE]
Quoted for truth.
I did a iq test on the internet and got a 79 :D
The paper thing said 136 or something around that when I was last at the doctor
Never been tested.
I voted under 80 because I have never bothered to finish an IQ test.
School psychologist said mine is approximately 150.
Too bad I'm a lazy fuck. :v:
My psychiatrist did one for me.
Got 129.
goddamnit, just one point more and i could've chosen the 130 option.
90
IQ tests are bullshit, regardless of where they're taken. I would probably be around 120-140 range though (considering how flawed they are).
136. not shitting you man
139
fun fact, it takes 15 IQ to open a door.
[b]THOSE TESTS ARE CULTURALLY BIASED![/b]
Cookie for anyone that gets the reference :v:
^25 IQ .. Also can anyone find an english version of the illustrated sciences IQ test? I found the danish one [url]http://illvid.dk/quiz-og-test/test-din-iq[/url] , it tests 6 forms of inteligence. Crystalised, and fluent inteligence, memory, paternrecognization and some other shit.
247
I didn't lie like those (^) guys
128.
Apparently 2nd highest in my school. :ohdear:
40
I r retard
120 from what I recall.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
