When pricks have to give their opinion on everything, and either have no idea when it's not wanted, or don't care.
"I have a right to my own opinion", yeah, well you can have one, but I don't want to fucking hear it.
"Boys will be boys" as an excuse to let your wild son/nephew/whatever run amok and be a dick to everyone else.
Pisses me off to no extent.
"Just Google it."
Hasn't it occurred to you that there [i]are[/i] better search engines out there?
"I'd like to see [I]you[/I] do better!"
[QUOTE=Stonecycle;39675603]"Just Google it."
Hasn't it occurred to you that there [i]are[/i] other search engines out there?[/QUOTE]
Which are usually very shitty though, that and Google is what the vast majority of people use.
[editline]22nd February 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=SockFC;39675645]"I'd like to see [I]you[/I] do better!"[/QUOTE]
This shit
One of my friends at school follows any story I tell with "Cool story bro, tell it again." In retaliation, I repeat whatever story I've just finished telling from the beginning.
I also see people with shirts that say "Cool Story Bro" or "Cool Story Babe, now get back in the kitchen and make me a sandwich."
"No"
"Stop"
"Get off of me"
"Rape!"
[t]http://i.imgur.com/vtu1ClC.gif[/t]
[QUOTE=Zepheniah;39675675]"No"
"Stop"
"Get off of me"
"Rape!"[/QUOTE]
PewDiePie?
[QUOTE=Stonecycle;39675603]"Just Google it."
Hasn't it occurred to you that there [i]are[/i] other search engines out there?[/QUOTE]
"Hey, I have a swell idea! Why don't we just Yahoo it!?"
~Said No One, Ever
[QUOTE=SockFC;39675645]"I'd like to see [I]you[/I] do better!"[/QUOTE]
Oh god, this is the worst argument ever. I hate it so much.
"You're not worth my time"
"Source?"
Honestly, most people only use that line when they know their argument is beaten and don't want to admit it. I don't get how proving your opponent doesn't keep links to every news article or study ever written helps an argument.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;39676352]"Source?"
Honestly, most people only use that line when they know their argument is beaten and don't want to admit it. I don't get how proving your opponent doesn't keep links to every news article or study ever written helps an argument.[/QUOTE]
Based on the context, though.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;39676352]"Source?"
Honestly, most people only use that line when they know their argument is beaten and don't want to admit it. I don't get how proving your opponent doesn't keep links to every news article or study ever written helps an argument.[/QUOTE]
This should only ever be used if you just said something ridiculous.
I bet you have no idea how many arguments have been won by someone making shit up.
Redundant phrases that are redundant.
pringles
"THUMBS UP IF YADDAYADDAYADDA!"
[editline]I forgot all about that[/editline]
Also, spaghetti jokes.
All that "spaghetti" crap.
I cannot be the only person who never found it funny right?
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;39677558]All that "spaghetti" crap.
I cannot be the only person who never found it funny right?[/QUOTE]
I am actually a pastafarian and I find this offensive.
[QUOTE=asteroidrules;39677558]All that "spaghetti" crap.
I cannot be the only person who never found it funny right?[/QUOTE]
Shrek was pretty retarded, too.
I mean it was funny like once, back in 2008 but after that it was overdone.
ANY LYRIC FROM A POPULAR RECENT SONG:suicide:
Examples:
"shine bright like a diamond"
"call me maybe"
[QUOTE=archangel125;39666994]I thought that particular misconception had been done away with ages ago. I have never once heard 'friendzoned' used in a sexist context. It's usually used to describe a situation in which a girl who knows very well a guy is into her, has no intention of ever returning his affections, but enjoys his attention so much she leads him on without ever actually saying she's not interested. That, my friends, is cruel. The guy would always much prefer to be told right away that she doesn't see him in a romantic light than to eventually come to that conclusion when he realizes she's passive-agressively keeping a platonic distance between them, even though she pretended affection when it suited her. If a guy led a girl on in like manner, it'd be called douchebaggery.
Hmm, what pisses me off? Seeing that term wrongly defined, or seeing it used in a sexist context.[/QUOTE]
I think that's one specific way to define it.
There's really a few different definitions that exist for it, but it seems like they all fall along the lines of "a guy likes a girl romantically but she only likes him platonically".
I consider myself friendzoned right now, but I don't think it's [I]her [/I]fault. It's entirely [I]my [/I]fault for getting too into her.
As stated above, Shrek and spaghetti. But mostly Shrek.
[QUOTE=Whatsinaname;39684067]As stated above, Shrek and spaghetti. But mostly Shrek.[/QUOTE]
I'd say they're both equally bad, although by now though Shrek is the more annoying since it's currently the more overused one.
"Love and tolerate"
"You hate me"
If I fucking hated you, I would be the one saying that I hate you.
If I have never even said the word hate anywhere near you, don't claim I've said it.
Bloody hell, I hate when people just decide that you feel something about something they did.
[QUOTE=Jagur;39684925]"Love and tolerate"[/QUOTE]
Thankfully, I mostly just see people use this ironically these days.
Man, there are so many phrases that piss me off. It's like this thread was made for me. Maybe I'm just a really irritable person. :v:
It's not really any particular phrase, but it bugs me when the only way somebody can be funny is by regurgitating quotes from movies/TV and acting like it's their own joke.
[QUOTE=BaconWallet42;39685687]It's not really any particular phrase, but it bugs me when the only way somebody can be funny is by regurgitating quotes from movies/TV and acting like it's their own joke.[/QUOTE]
even worse is when it doesn't fit with the current context in anyway, shape or form.
"Nice PR move there X" when it's just out of that company's heart.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.