On his blog version of the post, he posted a photo of a bunch of dead children and said it represented the pain of being 'incel'. He also said that feminism is worse than Nazism, feminism has killed more, and that it would be better to be sent to a gas chamber than to suffer through not having sex.
Also he said violence would not work and that he doesn't advocate violence at all, but then went on to say that all puas should be killed, adulterers should be killed, and that a therapist has to bring him the head of a feminist if he's going to listen to them.
[QUOTE=Kardia;45799212][I]Now, I won't give any links to this content, because I fear banning.[/I] But I will ask this... Do people here want to discuss these views and pick apart his points? [B]OR[/B] would you peeps rather forget this guy ever said a thing?[/QUOTE]
just link the fucking post, there's no way you're going to get banned and I can't find the post for shit
[QUOTE=Kardia;45800055]
Who's to say me criticizing his opinions won't stop him from doing something terrible?[/QUOTE]
You can't use that argument cause we don't even know if he was going to do something terrible in the first place. You're just assuming he's going to and using your assumptions to fuel your point against this guy.
[QUOTE=Kardia;45800055]That's an interesting point. But I can turn it on its head.
Who's to say me criticizing his opinions won't stop him from doing something terrible?[/QUOTE]
If you are worried, contact the cops or something.
[QUOTE=Elecbullet;45800087]just link the fucking post, there's no way you're going to get banned and I can't find the post for shit[/QUOTE]
I'm sorry but in the last 4 days like 120 people have been banned, some for linking content. I've seen like thousands of people get banned since I've been on this site and I don't plan to be one of them. So cautious I will be.
And honestly I think you are trying to trick me so I can get banned. You're an experienced user. You know what's what.
[editline]26th August 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Mr. Zombie;45800099]You can't use that argument cause we don't even know if he was going to do something terrible in the first place. You're just assuming he's going to and using your assumptions to fuel your point against this guy.[/QUOTE]
Likewise you can't assume such. So I guess in your own opinion, your point, the one that I flipped, was meritless in the first-place.
[QUOTE=Kardia;45800133]
And honestly I think you are trying to trick me so I can get banned. You're an experienced user. You know what's what.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, he's out for you. Big Bad Boogyman Elecbullet.
If you haven't been banned yet for this thread alone, posting the ramblings of a crazy dude isn't going to get you banned.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;45800105]If you are worried, contact the cops or something.[/QUOTE]
I think there is enough evidence to suggest that he genuinely holds these beliefs, but there is no evidence of direct danger coming from him. I'm worried enough to say that criticism of his views are important. But I'm not worried to the point where I will call police.
Last or First - you're a moron. Everything you said here is wrong.
Dead children aren't the pain of incel but decent children those created by thugs and their sex slaves have created.
Feminism has killed more than any violent ideology of the 20th century because it targeted those who can't use seduction, which were a majority when feminism began.
I ban people for saying incel is just about sex so you're rambling nonsense again.
PUAs and adulterers aren't for me to handle and as for a therapist imagine how many dead bodies does just a single feminist have. All because they weren't violent truckers who broke women's legs, bones, teeth and everything else.
you named yourself "antimodernist" lmfao
stop taking yourself so seriously
[QUOTE=elixwhitetail;45799248]
Best not to encourage him since he's been perma'd, I think, might make him decide to make alts and give the mods more shit to deal with.[/QUOTE]
Looks like he went and did that anyway.
[QUOTE=Mr. Zombie;45800148]Yeah, he's out for you. Big Bad Boogyman Elecbullet.
If you haven't been banned yet for this thread alone, posting the ramblings of a crazy dude isn't going to get you banned.[/QUOTE]
I'm not painting Elecbullet as a bad guy... he might consider it innocent fun to provoke bannable behavior, which is fine. I don't consider it that malicious to call him a Big Bad Boogeyman. It's really just amusing that he would lie like that... if he even was lying. Just speculating.
I'm paranoid that this thread is near bannable stuff. I feel a link would be the straw that breaks the camels back.
Hell even I'm not this paranoid
Oh god, it's just some anti-social person that doesn't go outside and with the infinite source of bullshit the internet as to offer, some lunatic out there is going to believe that shit and start talking like Rome is the golden age of humanity or something like that.
Who cares, it's just another out of many weirdos here and there are far many to come, whether it's unfortunate for our sake or fortunate for the hilarity they bring, it doesn't matter.
-snip-
@Mr.Zombie: Yeah I'm paranoid of bans. I love/hate the ban system. I reap the rewards of the order that it brings, but I fear it's silence.
[QUOTE=EXPLOOOSIONS!;45800222]Looks like he went and did that anyway.[/QUOTE]
Fucking dammit. [I]"antimodernist"[/I]? I guess this thread is getting closed now because he will be back with a new account.
I'll discuss shit with that sexist in my own time whenever I'm damn good and ready. Not here. Not on facepunch.
Oh god, he actually came back for a moment.
Screw it, I'll post the link.
[url=http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1396135&p=45797795&viewfull=1#post45797795]Here[/url], and [url=http://thatincelblogger.wordpress.com/2014/07/22/the-story-of-your-incel-an-inconvenient-truth/]here[/url] is the blog version, with a few extra things.
[QUOTE=Last or First;45800313]Screw it, I'll post the link.[/QUOTE]
[B]NOOOOOOOOO!!!![/B] (melodrama)
Another thing: he quotes someone saying that 20% of the men get 80% of the women, with 20% of the women getting married.
This is demonstrably false. In the US, the birth rate is a little less than 2.0 children per woman. The US population isn't shrinking by 80% each generation, and you would hear if the only women giving birth had 10 children on average. You would also hear if 80% of men didn't have sex.
He never really explains what "seduction" is either. He explains what it's not, but the only words he uses to explain seduction are "smooth talk" (which is just a goddamn synonym) and "being assertive".
Also he says that Mormonism is the smartest version of Christianity
and that feminists love PUAs (even though many people complain that they're misogynists), liberals ridicule atheists and evolution, and that there must be some massive conspiracy - sorry, "complex multidimensional event" - of over half the population lying about how they secretly love being raped.
oh, and that women are simple biological robots who are dumber than chimps
hmm, I wonder why women don't like dating him
We knew that all his ramblings are bullshit already. There's not really much to dissect in a false statement.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;45800252]Oh god, it's just some anti-social person that doesn't go outside and with the infinite source of bullshit the internet as to offer, some lunatic out there is going to believe that shit and start talking like Rome is the golden age of humanity or something like that.
Who cares, it's just another out of many weirdos here and there are far many to come, whether it's unfortunate for our sake or fortunate for the hilarity they bring, it doesn't matter.[/QUOTE]
I care about that ideology and it's effects. I care about its advocates as misguided human beings. Someone cared enough to ban him. Someone cared enough to close the thread, to silence that particular discussion.
I mean the mods here think it's effective to just kick him out of the house. I think it is more effective to communicate with them a little bit more. Which I will do some time. Eventually.
Best part of the wall of text:
[quote]Just because people say that they are decent doesn’t make it so. Even thinking that this is in fact the case doesn’t make it so. Pretty much every reprehensible group in the history of the world considered itself moral and decent. People that are considered awful even my a majority of population, like Tumblr radfems, all consider themselves a beacon of morality. A matter of perspective plays a hand in this. Most people reading this blog see me as evil incarnate but my friends see as a good man and a loyal friend. But perspective is just one thing. What matters is the objective truth.[/quote]
The hypocrisy and oblviousness just [I]leak[/I] from it.
And then there's his idea of an ideal society:
[quote]These societies have four basic traits
1. monogamy
2. female premarital chastity
3. solid moral religion
4. legal and easily available prostitution.[/quote]
Which just blatantly contradicts itself.
[QUOTE=Kardia;45800427]I care about that ideology and it's effects. I care about its advocates as misguided human beings. Someone cared enough to ban him. Someone cared enough to close the thread, to silence that particular discussion.
I mean the mods here think it's effective to just kick him out of the house. I think it is more effective to communicate with them a little bit more. Which I will do some time. Eventually.[/QUOTE]
We cared enough because it was a bannable offense. It wasn't a psychology session, it was an idiot posting like an idiot. They got rid of him and that's their job. Nothing more.
[QUOTE=Mr. Zombie;45800448]We cared enough because it was a bannable offense. It wasn't a psychology session, it was an idiot posting like an idiot. They got rid of him and that's their job. Nothing more.[/QUOTE]
This is true. Obviously mods aren't behaving in people best interests. Rather, the forums best interests.
[editline]26th August 2014[/editline]
Anyway, I'm off to sleep. Goodnight peeps. Sorry if I ruffled your feathers.
last or first - you are utterly insane...
The fuck does the birth rate of some woman have to do with the fact that a minority of men are fucking a majority of women? Are you seriously too insane to realize that these men father almost all of the children with their retarded sluts?
Seducction is attracting a women via ways that aren't used by the remaining three types.
Nowhere do I say that feminists love PUAs. But since most feminists are women and women think one thing, say the other and do the third of course they spread their diseased legs to PUA scum even if feminism itself criticizes them.
There is no conspiracy of women lying how they love to be raped. Most women believe that rape will be uncomfortable for them because of feminist brainwashing but of course they love it if they try it - we're mammals and their reproduction closely resembles "rape".
I put rape in brackets because rape was never about consent anyway. It was a property crime against woman's father or husband, as well as woman's purity, which was the sane approach. Never was it about consent. The idea that somebody could rape a promiscuous skank was and always will be crazy.
Nobody sane cares about "consent", women least of all. If a guy takes them that's nothing but a huge plus to him in their eyes.
As for those four points, how do they contradict? Look at the replies there where I told that David guy how they don't.
[added]1409017339[/added]
ast or first - you are utterly insane...
The fuck does the birth rate of some woman have to do with the fact that a minority of men are fucking a majority of women? Are you seriously too insane to realize that these men father almost all of the children with their retarded sluts?
Seducction is attracting a women via ways that aren't used by the remaining three types.
Nowhere do I say that feminists love PUAs. But since most feminists are women and women think one thing, say the other and do the third of course they spread their diseased legs to PUA scum even if feminism itself criticizes them.
There is no conspiracy of women lying how they love to be raped. Most women believe that rape will be uncomfortable for them because of feminist brainwashing but of course they love it if they try it - we're mammals and their reproduction closely resembles "rape".
I put rape in brackets because rape was never about consent anyway. It was a property crime against woman's father or husband, as well as woman's purity, which was the sane approach. Never was it about consent. The idea that somebody could rape a promiscuous skank was and always will be crazy.
Nobody sane cares about "consent", women least of all. If a guy takes them that's nothing but a huge plus to him in their eyes.
As for those four points, how do they contradict? Look at the replies there where I told that David guy how they don't.
[added]1409017360[/added]
last or first - you are utterly insane...
The fuck does the birth rate of some woman have to do with the fact that a minority of men are fucking a majority of women? Are you seriously too insane to realize that these men father almost all of the children with their retarded sluts?
Seducction is attracting a women via ways that aren't used by the remaining three types.
Nowhere do I say that feminists love PUAs. But since most feminists are women and women think one thing, say the other and do the third of course they spread their diseased legs to PUA scum even if feminism itself criticizes them.
There is no conspiracy of women lying how they love to be raped. Most women believe that rape will be uncomfortable for them because of feminist brainwashing but of course they love it if they try it - we're mammals and their reproduction closely resembles "rape".
I put rape in brackets because rape was never about consent anyway. It was a property crime against woman's father or husband, as well as woman's purity, which was the sane approach. Never was it about consent. The idea that somebody could rape a promiscuous skank was and always will be crazy.
Nobody sane cares about "consent", women least of all. If a guy takes them that's nothing but a huge plus to him in their eyes.
As for those four points, how do they contradict? Look at the replies there where I told that David guy how they don't.
[added]1409017366[/added]
ast or first - you are utterly insane...
The fuck does the birth rate of some woman have to do with the fact that a minority of men are fucking a majority of women? Are you seriously too insane to realize that these men father almost all of the children with their retarded sluts?
Seducction is attracting a women via ways that aren't used by the remaining three types.
Nowhere do I say that feminists love PUAs. But since most feminists are women and women think one thing, say the other and do the third of course they spread their diseased legs to PUA scum even if feminism itself criticizes them.
There is no conspiracy of women lying how they love to be raped. Most women believe that rape will be uncomfortable for them because of feminist brainwashing but of course they love it if they try it - we're mammals and their reproduction closely resembles "rape".
I put rape in brackets because rape was never about consent anyway. It was a property crime against woman's father or husband, as well as woman's purity, which was the sane approach. Never was it about consent. The idea that somebody could rape a promiscuous skank was and always will be crazy.
Nobody sane cares about "consent", women least of all. If a guy takes them that's nothing but a huge plus to him in their eyes.
As for those four points, how do they contradict? Look at the replies there where I told that David guy how they don't.
[added]1409017425[/added]
last or first - you are utterly insane...
The fuck does the birth rate of some woman have to do with the fact that a minority of men are fucking a majority of women? Are you seriously too insane to realize that these men father almost all of the children with their retarded sluts?
Seducction is attracting a women via ways that aren't used by the remaining three types.
Nowhere do I say that feminists love PUAs. But since most feminists are women and women think one thing, say the other and do the third of course they spread their diseased legs to PUA scum even if feminism itself criticizes them.
There is no conspiracy of women lying how they love to be raped. Most women believe that rape will be uncomfortable for them because of feminist brainwashing but of course they love it if they try it - we're mammals and their reproduction closely resembles "rape".
I put rape in brackets because rape was never about consent anyway. It was a property crime against woman's father or husband, as well as woman's purity, which was the sane approach. Never was it about consent. The idea that somebody could rape a promiscuous skank was and always will be crazy.
Nobody sane cares about "consent", women least of all. If a guy takes them that's nothing but a huge plus to him in their eyes.
As for those four points, how do they contradict? Look at the replies there where I told that David guy how they don't.
[added]1409017441[/added]
ast or first - you are utterly insane...
The fuck does the birth rate of some woman have to do with the fact that a minority of men are fucking a majority of women? Are you seriously too insane to realize that these men father almost all of the children with their retarded sluts?
Seducction is attracting a women via ways that aren't used by the remaining three types.
Nowhere do I say that feminists love PUAs. But since most feminists are women and women think one thing, say the other and do the third of course they spread their diseased legs to PUA scum even if feminism itself criticizes them.
There is no conspiracy of women lying how they love to be raped. Most women believe that rape will be uncomfortable for them because of feminist brainwashing but of course they love it if they try it - we're mammals and their reproduction closely resembles "rape".
I put rape in brackets because rape was never about consent anyway. It was a property crime against woman's father or husband, as well as woman's purity, which was the sane approach. Never was it about consent. The idea that somebody could rape a promiscuous skank was and always will be crazy.
Nobody sane cares about "consent", women least of all. If a guy takes them that's nothing but a huge plus to him in their eyes.
As for those four points, how do they contradict? Look at the replies there where I told that David guy how they don't.
[added]1409017493[/added]
ast or first - you are utterly insane...
The fuck does the birth rate of some woman have to do with the fact that a minority of men are fucking a majority of women? Are you seriously too insane to realize that these men father almost all of the children with their retarded sluts?
Seducction is attracting a women via ways that aren't used by the remaining three types.
Nowhere do I say that feminists love PUAs. But since most feminists are women and women think one thing, say the other and do the third of course they spread their diseased legs to PUA scum even if feminism itself criticizes them.
There is no conspiracy of women lying how they love to be raped. Most women believe that rape will be uncomfortable for them because of feminist brainwashing but of course they love it if they try it - we're mammals and their reproduction closely resembles "rape".
I put rape in brackets because rape was never about consent anyway. It was a property crime against woman's father or husband, as well as woman's purity, which was the sane approach. Never was it about consent. The idea that somebody could rape a promiscuous skank was and always will be crazy.
Nobody sane cares about "consent", women least of all. If a guy takes them that's nothing but a huge plus to him in their eyes.
As for those four points, how do they contradict? Look at the replies there where I told that David guy how they don't.
[added]1409017503[/added]
ast or first - you are utterly insane...
The fuck does the birth rate of some woman have to do with the fact that a minority of men are fucking a majority of women? Are you seriously too insane to realize that these men father almost all of the children with their retarded sluts?
Seducction is attracting a women via ways that aren't used by the remaining three types.
Nowhere do I say that feminists love PUAs. But since most feminists are women and women think one thing, say the other and do the third of course they spread their diseased legs to PUA scum even if feminism itself criticizes them.
There is no conspiracy of women lying how they love to be raped. Most women believe that rape will be uncomfortable for them because of feminist brainwashing but of course they love it if they try it - we're mammals and their reproduction closely resembles "rape".
I put rape in brackets because rape was never about consent anyway. It was a property crime against woman's father or husband, as well as woman's purity, which was the sane approach. Never was it about consent. The idea that somebody could rape a promiscuous skank was and always will be crazy.
Nobody sane cares about "consent", women least of all. If a guy takes them that's nothing but a huge plus to him in their eyes.
As for those four points, how do they contradict? Look at the replies there where I told that David guy how they don't.
[highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("Alt of permabanned user(s)/continues to post incoherently" - NiandraLades))[/highlight]
I take comfort in the fact that his whole problem is that he will never reproduce.
[QUOTE=Kardia;45799212]Not long ago, on the thread: "[I]Guy from misc shoots up the place I order sandwiches from, kills four people[/I]", banned user [B]Caamib[/B], posted what I and others call: "[B]THE GREAT TEXT-WALL OF FACEPUNCH[/B]."
This was in the sensationalist headlines section of the forum (it's now locked). And this was followed by [B]hundreds[/B] of responses in a very short amount of time.
This guy is a hateful man. Who I think has the potential to cause a lot of harm. He could be the next [U]Elliot Rodgers[/U], in my opinion. And I think people should be aware of him. Also, if he himself is not going to harm anyone, he has the potential to inspire such with his writings.
And so I think it is best we pick this guy's writings apart. We should criticize them. Because if we don't, people who hold these views will stay in a bubble where no one criticizes them - until it is too late. And the worse thing happens.
[I]Now, I won't give any links to this content, because I fear banning.[/I] But I will ask this... Do people here want to discuss these views and pick apart his points? [B]OR[/B] would you peeps rather forget this guy ever said a thing?[/QUOTE]
He didn't seem hateful, but rather normal and willing to criticize today's western society. Instead of reading what he had to say, everyone joined in on a bandwagon. Many responses were pure ad hominem, while some were filled with strawman arguments. You all are too quick to judge and it is rather disappointing.
[QUOTE=seano12;45800549]He didn't seem hateful, but rather normal and willing to criticize today's western society. Instead of reading what he had to say, everyone joined in on a bandwagon. Many responses were pure ad hominem, while some were filled with strawman arguments.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TruckerSlave;45800501]The fuck does the birth rate of some woman have to do with the fact that a minority of men are fucking a majority of women? Are you seriously too insane to realize that these men father almost all of the children with their retarded sluts?
...
Nowhere do I say that feminists love PUAs. But since most feminists are women and women think one thing, say the other and do the third of course they spread their diseased legs to PUA scum even if feminism itself criticizes them.
There is no conspiracy of women lying how they love to be raped. Most women believe that rape will be uncomfortable for them because of feminist brainwashing but of course they love it if they try it - we're mammals and their reproduction closely resembles "rape".
I put rape in brackets because rape was never about consent anyway. It was a property crime against woman's father or husband, as well as woman's purity, which was the sane approach. Never was it about consent. [B]The idea that somebody could rape a promiscuous skank was and always will be crazy. [/B]
[B]Nobody sane cares about "consent", women least of all.[/B] If a guy takes them that's nothing but a huge plus to him in their eyes. [/QUOTE]
This is 'normal' to you, seano? Discussing rape as a misuse of property and that women have been brainwashed into believing they hate rape but they'll love it if they "try" it?
[QUOTE=Last or First;45800313]Oh god, he actually came back for a moment.
Screw it, I'll post the link.
[url=http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1396135&p=45797795&viewfull=1#post45797795]Here[/url], and [url=http://thatincelblogger.wordpress.com/2014/07/22/the-story-of-your-incel-an-inconvenient-truth/]here[/url] is the blog version, with a few extra things.[/QUOTE]
The main article of the blog is just the same wank we've seen, but the comments are actually interesting, in that quite a few of them are trying (in vain) to get caamib/thatincelblogger/whoever to perhaps have a change of thought. Some of them come up with some good points against caamib (even if I disagree with some other parts of their replies).
Unfortunately, that blog is their own little world, so they just seem to out and out delete posts they don't like (See, disagree with him). I mean, if these other "incel" people can't get them to think rationally, then all hope is lost I think.
[B]edit:[/B]
And yes, I did sit and read through the comments :(
seano12- thank you for your civility. I am amazed that there is somebody with a brain here. But your words are going to waste and you might be banned as well.
Trying to reason with a liberal is like trying to teach a dog to play chess. When they try to make arguments, like that last lunatic, you see just how stupid they are.
I'm really convinced he did a Spartacus marathon and now he's too deep into its setting to get out.
[editline]26th August 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=TruckerSlave;45800578]seano12- thank you for your civility. I am amazed that there is somebody with a brain here. But your words are going to waste and you might be banned as well.
Trying to reason with a liberal is like trying to teach a dog to play chess. When they try to make arguments, like that last lunatic, you see just how stupid they are.[/QUOTE]
He even talks like them lmao
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
